Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis

A. I. Mourad, R. Gniadecki
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.13.20151340
A. I. Mourad
1Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta
2University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine
BSc MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Gniadecki
1Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta
MD PhD DMSci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gniadeck{at}ualberta.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Drug survival studies have been utilized to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of biologics used in psoriasis. However, the increasing volume of drug survival data suffers from large variability due to regional differences in drug availability, patient selection and biologic reimbursement.

Objectives To conduct a meta-analysis of biologic drug survival to determine comparative effectiveness of the biologics in a real-world setting.

Methods Studies reporting drug survival for biologic therapy in psoriasis were identified by a systematic literature search. Hazard ratio data for drug discontinuation were estimated directly from published Kaplan-Meier estimator curves at year 1, 2 and 5 of treatment and compared pairwise for the following biologics: ustekinumab, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, secukinumab and ixekizumab. This pooled hazard ratios were used to estimate 2- and 5-year overall drug survival rates.

Results Ustekinumab had the longest persistence at 2 years and 5 years among all biologics included in this meta-analysis. Adalimumab was superior to etanercept and infliximab at 5 years. Pooled 5-year drug survival rates for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were 46.3%, 35.9% and 34.7%, respectively. 2- and 5-year data were not available for anti-IL-17 drugs, but at 1-year ustekinumab outperformed secukinumab, the latter being equal to anti-TNFs.

Conclusions Ustekinumab is characterized by longer drug survival than TNF inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. Estimated pooled 2- and 5-year drug survival rates may serve as a useful tool for patient communication and clinical decision-making.

Competing Interest Statement

Dr. Gniadecki has received speakers honorarium from Mallinckrodt, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, and Leo Pharma, is on the advisory board for Mallinckrodt, Janssen, Amgen, AbbVie, Eli Lily, Sanofi, Novartis, and Leo Pharma. Dr. Gniadecki is an investigator in clinical trials for Janssen, Celgene, AbbVie, and Leo Pharma. Dr. Mourad has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Association of Psoriasis Patients in the form of a research student studentship.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Association of Psoriasis Patients in the form of a research student studentship.

Data Availability

Statistical used to run the meta-analysis is published in Mendeley. Mourad, Ahmed; Gniadecki, Robert (2020), Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/jb2dz98yn7.1

http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/jb2dz98yn7.1

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 15, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis
A. I. Mourad, R. Gniadecki
medRxiv 2020.07.13.20151340; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.13.20151340
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis
A. I. Mourad, R. Gniadecki
medRxiv 2020.07.13.20151340; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.13.20151340

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Dermatology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)