Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Concerns with the use of imputation to assign HLA allele-level typing in research predicting transplant outcomes

View ORCID ProfileAnat R Tambur, Michael Gmeiner, View ORCID ProfileCharles F Manski
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.19.20157461
Anat R Tambur
aFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anat R Tambur
Michael Gmeiner
aFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles F Manski
bDepartment of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
cInstitute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Charles F Manski
  • For correspondence: cfmanski{at}northwestern.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Incomplete information on HLA allele typing is a persistent problem when analyzing the role of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) in transplantation. To refine the predictions possible with partial knowledge of HLA typing, some researchers use HaploStats statistics on the frequencies of haplotypes within specified ethnic/national populations to impute complete HLA allele typing. We evaluated methods that use imputation to predict patient outcomes after organ transplantation, with focus on prediction of graft survival conditional on typing information of the donor and recipient. Logical arguments show that imputation yields no predictive power when predictions are conditioned on all observed HLA typing data. Computational experiments indicate that imputation does not have predictive power when applied to risk-assessment models that make predictions conditional on only part of the observable HLA data. We therefore caution against reliance on imputation to overcome incomplete measurement. We encourage high-resolution typing of HLA antigens to improve prediction of transplant outcomes and matching of donors with recipients. Similar considerations should likely apply in other clinical settings.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed and exempted from approval by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The standard analysis files from the SRTR are restricted. Haplostats data is freely available using their online tool. The authors can provide code that was used to perform analysis and scrape Haplostats. To fully replicate results of this paper, researchers need to obtain standard analysis files directly from the SRTR.

https://www.srtr.org/

https://www.haplostats.org/

  • Abbreviations

    HLA
    Human Leukocyte Antigen
    KDPI
    Kidney Donor Profile Index
    OPTN
    Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network
    RMI
    Random Multiple Imputation
    SRTR
    Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 21, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Concerns with the use of imputation to assign HLA allele-level typing in research predicting transplant outcomes
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Concerns with the use of imputation to assign HLA allele-level typing in research predicting transplant outcomes
    Anat R Tambur, Michael Gmeiner, Charles F Manski
    medRxiv 2020.07.19.20157461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.19.20157461
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Concerns with the use of imputation to assign HLA allele-level typing in research predicting transplant outcomes
    Anat R Tambur, Michael Gmeiner, Charles F Manski
    medRxiv 2020.07.19.20157461; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.19.20157461

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Transplantation
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)