Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care

Rossana Sanchez Russo, Michael J. Gambello, Melissa M. Murphy, Katrina Aberizk, Emily Black, T. Lindsey Burrell, Grace Carlock, Joseph F. Cubells, Michael T. Epstein, Roberto Espana, Katrina Goines, Ryan Guest, Cheryl Klaiman, Sookyong Koh, Elizabeth Leslie, Longchuan Li, Derek Novacek, Celine A. Saulnier, Esra Sefik, Sarah Schultz, Elaine Walker, Stormi White, The Emory 3q29 Project, Jennifer Gladys Mulle
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20162149
Rossana Sanchez Russo
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Gambello
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa M. Murphy
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina Aberizk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Black
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Lindsey Burrell
2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
3Marcus Autism Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace Carlock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph F. Cubells
4Departments of Human Genetics and Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Emory University School of Medicine
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael T. Epstein
5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Emory University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Espana
6Department of Psychology, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina Goines
6Department of Psychology, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Guest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl Klaiman
2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
3Marcus Autism Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sookyong Koh
2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Leslie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Longchuan Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek Novacek
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Celine A. Saulnier
7Neurodevelopmental Assessment & Consulting Services
2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esra Sefik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Schultz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Walker
6Department of Psychology, Emory University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stormi White
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Gladys Mulle
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine
8Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
MHS PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jmulle{at}emory.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose To understand the consequences of the 3q29 deletion on medical, neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurological sequalae by systematic evaluation of affected individuals. To develop evidence-based recommendations using these data for effective clinical care.

Methods 32 Individuals with the 3q29 deletion were evaluated using a defined phenotyping protocol and standardized data collection instruments.

Results Medical manifestations were varied and reported across nearly every bodily system, with congenital heart defects (25%) the most severe and heterogeneous gastrointestinal symptoms (81%) the most common. Physical exam revealed a high proportion of musculoskeletal findings (81%). Neurodevelopmental phenotypes represent a significant burden and include intellectual disability (34%), autism spectrum disorder (38%), executive function deficits (46%), and graphomotor weakness (78%). Psychiatric illness manifests across the lifespan with schizophrenia prodrome (15%), psychosis (20%), anxiety disorders (40%) and ADHD (63%). On neurological exam study subjects displayed only mild or moderate motor difficulties.

Conclusions By direct evaluation of 3q29 deletion study subjects, we document common features of the syndrome, including a high burden of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Evidence-based recommendations for evaluation, referral, and management are provided to help guide clinicians in the care of 3q29 deletion patients.

Introduction

Individuals with 3q29 deletion syndrome (OMIM #609425) are hemizygous for a 1.6 Mb interval containing 21 protein coding genes1. The syndrome has a prevalence of ∼1 in 30,000 and is associated with reduced birth weight, failure to thrive, heart defects, intellectual disability, anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and schizophrenia1–6. Case reports have provided a rich source of data on individual patients and have illuminated many facets of the syndrome2, 7–27. However, phenotyping in case reports is rarely systematically applied, leading to bias in the curation of associated signs and symptoms2. Large cohorts of deidentified individuals referred for genetic testing28–31 or ascertained for a specific phenotype (such as autism spectrum disorder32 or schizophrenia5, 33–35) confirm the pathogenicity of the 3q29 deletion and provide evidence of increased risk for a single phenotype, but do not inform about the broader phenotypic spectrum. Systematic self-report of phenotypes from registries are also emerging, but are hampered by limitations of self-report data3, 4. For these reasons a comprehensive, unbiased characterization of the syndrome is needed, using gold standard instruments and direct evaluation of study subjects by trained experts36.

We sought to address these knowledge gaps in the clinical phenotype of 3q29 deletion syndrome. The Emory 3q29 Project unites an interdisciplinary team toward understanding the phenotypic spectrum, natural history, and molecular mechanisms of 3q29 deletion syndrome (http://genome.emory.edu/3q29/). As part of this project, our clinical team of investigators has directly and systematically evaluated 32 study subjects with the canonical 1.6 Mb 3q29 deletion using a standardized, transdiagnostic phenotyping protocol that includes gold-standard instruments36. These data have revealed new aspects of 3q29 deletion syndrome and provide guidance for the medical geneticist on recommended referral, follow-up, and management of patients.

Materials and Methods

Study subject eligibility

The study design, eligibility, recruitment criteria, and evaluation process have been previously described36. Briefly, individuals were recruited from the 3q29 registry housed at Emory University3 (3q29deletion.org). Inclusion criteria were: validated diagnosis of 3q29 deletion syndrome by documented chromosome microarray analysis where the deletion overlapped the canonical region (hg19, chr3:195725000-197350000) by >80%, and willingness and ability to travel to Atlanta GA. Exclusion criteria were: any 3q29 deletion with less than 80% overlap with the canonical region; non-fluency in English, and age younger than six years. One exception to the age criterion was made; a 4.85 year old who was part of a previously-described multiplex family was included in the study27. After an informed consent session with a staff scientist (MM), travel was arranged. This study was approved by the Emory Institutional Board (IRB000088012). Participant characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1: Study Subjects

Evaluations

All study subjects were evaluated over two days at a designated clinical evaluation site. An in-person informed consent and assent procedure was repeated on the first study day.

Evaluations were conducted as follows (summarized in Table 2):

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2: Assessments and measures used in this study

Medical History & Physical Examination

Parents completed a comprehensive medical history (Supplementary Information), which was reviewed during the visit with a trained medical geneticist (EB, RSR, MJG). The medical geneticist also completed a physical examination of the study subject. Photographs were taken of the front and profile of the face and any other physical characteristics of note. When possible, medical records were obtained to validate significant medical concerns.

Following the study visits, the medical geneticists met to discuss the results of the medical history and physical examination, identify relevant diagnoses by system, and classify each diagnosis using the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terminology when available. HPO terminology provides a classification system for clinical abnormalities in humans (https://hpo.jax.org/app/). A detailed assessment of craniofacial characteristics was based upon physical examination notes and the photographs taken during the visit. Z-scores and percentiles for height, weight, and head circumference were determined according to The Handbook of Physical Measurements37 and were generated using the Face2Gene application.

Neurodevelopmental Evaluation

Table 2 summarizes a systematic battery used to evaluate neurodevelopmental phenotypes, which included assessments of cognitive ability (Differential Ability Scales, 2nd ed.38 (DAS) for ages <18; Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence39 (WASI) for ages > 18), adaptive behavior (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales 3rd ed.40), visual-motor integration (Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, 6th ed.41 (VMI)), Autism spectrum disorder (Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised42 (ADI-R); Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd ed.43 (ADOS)), and executive function (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions44 (BRIEF-2 for ages <18, BRIEF-A for ages ≥ 18)).

Cognitive testing, VMI, and autism assessments were carried out by clinical psychologists (CS, CK, SW) early in the day to reduce fatigue. The Vineland and BRIEFs were completed by the parent or caretaker electronically via the publisher websites (Pearson Q-global and PARiconnect, respectively) either before or during the visit.

Psychiatric Evaluation

A systematic battery was also used to assess anxiety (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children45, 46 (ADIS) in ages <18, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Diagnosis, Research Version47 (SCID-5-RV) in ages 18+); general psychopathology (Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children48 (KSADS) in ages<18, SCID-5-RV47 in ages 18+); prodrome (Structured Interview for Prodromal symptoms49, 50 (SIPS)) and psychosis (SCID-5-RV). Prodrome and psychosis were evaluated in individuals age 8 years and older; at younger ages, developmentally appropriate magical thinking cannot be distinguished from true psychosis. Anxiety disorders in study subjects < 18 were evaluated with the ADIS, administered by a trained clinician (TLB). The KSADS, SCID-5-RV, and SIPS were administered by clinical psychology trainees (RE, DN, KG, KA, RG) supervised by a team clinical psychologist (EW). A qualitative assessment of global mental status and health was conducted by team psychiatrists (JFC, ME) to supplement impression and results from the formal assessments.

Neurological Exam

A subset of study subjects (n = 23) were evaluated by a pediatric neurologist (SK) for gross and fine motor phenotypes, including assessment of gait, heel to toe and stressed gait, fine finger movements, rapid alternating movements, as well as finger to nose and heel to shin tests. Performance on each task was rated using a 4-point scale of impairment severity: 0 (none/normal), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). General clinical impressions were also noted. Exam results were recorded using a semi-structured data collection template; after the study visit data were entered into redcap.

Results

Participants

32 participants were consented and evaluated, including 4 participants from a single family27. Study subjects ranged in age from 4.8-39.1 years (mean age 14.5 years, median age 11.7 years); 62.5% (n = 20) were male. Study subjects were recruited from across the US, Canada, and the UK (Table 1).

Medical history results

A summary of symptoms and diagnoses that occurred in at least 10% of study subjects evaluated is presented in Table 3. Supplemental table 1 incudes any symptoms or diagnosis reported in at least one study subject. The medical history review did not reveal any significant pre- or peri-natal findings that were generalizable across subjects.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3: Frequency of symptoms and diagnoses reported in 10% or more of participants (N = 32)

Review of systems

Ear, nose, and throat (ENT)

78% of study subjects (n = 25) reported an ENT-related symptom or diagnosis in their medical history. 22% of subjects (n = 7) reported recurrent ear infections, and 3 required surgery. 59% (n = 19) had a symptom or diagnosis related to the eye. The most common ocular phenotype was strabismus (28%, n = 9), with 3 subjects requiring surgery. Vision problems encountered later in childhood included astigmatism (16%, n = 5) and myopia (16%, n = 5). Epistaxis was the most common nasal manifestation occurring in 22% of study subjects (n = 7), two of whom required surgical correction. Dental anomalies were reported in 41% (n = 13) and commonly included enamel hypoplasia with proclivity to caries and abnormalities in number and size of teeth.

Cardiovascular

Structural cardiovascular disease is reported in 47% (n = 15) of patients. These included complex congenital cardiovascular disease (25%, n = 8) such as hypoplastic right heart (n = 1), patent ductus arteriosus (n = 2), pulmonary atresia (n = 2), pulmonary stenosis (n = 1), tricuspid stenosis (n = 1), ventricular septal defect (n = 2), and arterial-venous malformation (AVM) originating from the descending thoracic aorta (n = 1). Four individuals in this study (12.5%) required surgery to address their cardiovascular condition.

Gastrointestinal

Gastrointestinal manifestations were noted in the majority (81%, n = 26) of patients. Among these, half of the patients (50%, n = 16) reported gastroesophageal reflux and 41% (n = 13) reported chronic constipation. Additionally, feeding difficulties in infancy were reported in more than half of patients (59%, n = 19) and persisted beyond infancy in 16% (n = 5). Only 9% (n = 3) of patients had failure to thrive in infancy, 2 of whom continued to have failure to thrive beyond infancy. In contrast, failure to thrive beyond infancy was reported in 41% (n = 13).

Renal/Genitourinary

Enuresis was encountered in 25% (n = 8) of our cohort. Of these, seven had ongoing enuresis. The remaining study subject had a history of enuresis reported by parents during the medical history interview that was resolved at the time of this study.

Respiratory, allergy, and immunological

Asthma was the most common respiratory manifestation, occurring in 19% (n = 6) of patients. Seasonal allergies were reported in 16% (n = 5) of subjects, two of whom also had asthma. Food allergies were noted in 13% (n = 4) of subject.

Integumentary

13% (n = 4) of subjects reported a diagnosis of eczema. Keratosis pilaris was also reported in 13% (n = 4) of subjects.

Sleep

Sleep disturbances were reported in at least 31% (n = 10) with 28% (n = 9) reporting difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, and 1 person reporting sleep walking.

Neurological

Seizures were reported in 13% (n = 4) of subjects. 16% (n = 5) of subjects reported experiencing headache or migraine.

Medical History and Physical examination

Table 4 presents a summary of review of systems and physical findings (symptoms are not found on PE but reported by the patient) and diagnoses in at least 10% of study subjects evaluated. Supplemental table 2 incudes any symptoms or diagnosis found in at least one study subject.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4. Frequency of Physical Exam Findings documented in 10% or more of participants

Growth parameters

Compared to age and sex norms, 25% of subjects (n = 8) had a weight −2 SD below the mean. These subjects ranged from 4-24 years and were evenly split between males and females. 16% of subjects (n = 5) were −2 SD below the mean for height. These subjects were 4 males and 1 female ranging in age from 4-39 years. 16% (n = 5) were −2 SD below the mean for head circumference. These subjects were 4 males and 1 female ranging from 4-12 years old. No subject had low weight, height, and head circumference. Most subjects had low measurements only in one parameter.

Dysmorphic features

Subtle craniofacial dysmorphisms were noted among patients in the nasal region. These findings were identified by medical geneticists during the physical exam and quantified through next generation phenotyping technology through Face2Gene (FDNA, Inc., Boston, MA). See Mak et al (manuscript in preparation) for additional information.

Musculoskeletal manifestations

On physical exam, 84% (n = 27) of study subjects had one or more musculoskeletal phenotypes. Chest deformities were noted in 41% (n = 13), and included pectus excavatum (25%, n = 8), pectus carinatum (9%, n = 3), and chest asymmetry (6%, n = 2). Manifestations in the upper extremities were seen in 47% of study subjects (n = 15). The most common findings were long, thin fingers (22%, n = 7) and tapered fingers (13%, n = 4). Lower extremity manifestations were seen in 72% of study subjects (n = 23). These included pes planus (31%, n = 10) or medial rotation of medial malleolus (31%, n = 10), with 22% having both pes planus and medial rotation of the medial malleolus. Abnormalities of the toes were also observed in 28% (n = 9) of study subjects, including abnormal hallux (13%, n = 4) commonly seen as broad hallux and hallux valgus, and abnormal non-hallux toes (19%, n = 6) frequently seen as curved, short, or overlapping toes.

Within the other systems examined, individual symptoms or diagnoses were noted (see Supplemental Table 2), but no single finding was frequent enough to be generalizable across study subjects.

Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes

Rates of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diagnoses are shown in Figure 1; quantitative mean and median scores with ranges are shown in Table 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5. Mean and median scores on neurodevelopmental instruments
Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

Percent of 3q29 deletion participants who qualify for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric diagnoses after direct evaluation by our team. 19% of study subjects qualified for a diagnosis of psychosis; 15% had features of schizophrenia prodrome (light blue). ID, intellectual disability; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; VMI, visual-motor integration.

Cognitive Ability and Adaptive Function

Mean IQ score (FSIQ) was 73.0 (median 75.5, range 40-99). Mean adaptive function as measured with the Vineland was 73.9 (median 70.1, range 48-107). Individuals were considered to have intellectual disability if both GCA and adaptive behavior scores were >2 SD below the expected mean (> 70 on both evaluations), consistent with DSM-V criteria. By this metric, 11 individuals (34%) qualified for a diagnosis of ID.

Graphomotor Weakness

78% of study subjects were found to have clinically significant graphomotor weakness, defined as a score < 2 SD below the expected mean. Examination of subtest scores indicated greater weakness in motor coordination than visual perception.

Executive Function

47% of study subjects (n = 15) were found to have clinically significant deficits in Executive Function, with T-scores that were ≥ 2 SD above the mean.

Autism

Autism was assessed using the ADOS and ADI-R; these instruments were used to inform the administering clinician’s best estimate diagnosis. Of 32 individuals evaluated, 12 (37.5%) met DSM-V criteria for a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nine of 20 males evaluated (45%) qualified for a diagnosis of autism, a 19.5-fold excess as compared to the general population rate of 1 in 42 males (2.3%)51. Three out of 12 females evaluated (25%) also qualified for a diagnosis of autism, a 50-fold excess compared to the general population rate of ASD in females (1 in 189, 0.5%)51. These data confirm there is a high risk for autism associated with the 3q29 deletion in both males and females.

Psychiatric Evaluation

Anxiety Disorders

40% (n = 13) of study subjects qualified for at least one anxiety disorder; 18% (n=6) had more than one anxiety disorder diagnosis. Anxiety disorders included generalized anxiety disorder (22%, n = 7), specific phobia (19%, n = 6), separation anxiety (12.5%, n = 4) and social anxiety disorder (6%, n = 2).

Prodromal Symptoms & Psychosis

Of 21 individuals who were evaluated, 19% (n = 4) qualified for diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Three additional individuals (14%) were found to exhibit features consistent with the schizophrenia prodrome. These data are consistent with prior reports establishing the 3q29 deletion as a risk factor for schizophrenia5, 6, 33–35.

General Psychopathology

63% (n = 20) of individuals evaluated qualified for a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). 19 of these individuals could be further classified into subtypes: ADHD-inattentive type (n = 10), ADHD-combined type (n = 8), and ADHD-Hyperactive/impulsive (n = 1). One additional individual did not fit criteria for any subtype and was diagnosed as “other specified ADHD.” The high rate of ADHD in 3q29 deletion study subjects is consistent with deficits in executive function, as reported above. No other psychiatric diagnosis was present in great than 10% of study subjects. Two people met criteria for intermittent explosive disorder; two people met criteria for obsessive compulsive disorder; two people met criteria for major depressive disorder. For each of the following diagnoses, one person met criteria: oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, Bipolar I disorder.

Neurological Exam

A subset of study subjects (n = 23) were evaluated by a trained pediatric neurologist for motor phenotypes associated with cerebellar dysfunction. Motor phenotypes wereidentified, but generally were mild (range 30-47%) or moderate (range 4-48%, Table 6). Only one person displayed a severe cerebellar motor phenotype, in rapid alternating movement.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6: Results of Neurological Exam for 23 individuals with 3q29 deletion syndrome

Discussion

Here we report the first comprehensive description of 3q29 deletion syndrome, by direct systematic evaluation of 32 study subjects using a defined protocol and gold-standard instruments. While nearly all major systems are affected in 3q29 deletion syndrome, the ocular, dental, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, musculoskeletal and neurologic systems are affected with the greatest frequency and should be prioritized for evaluation and follow-up. There is also a high burden of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric illness, requiring intervention and support across the lifespan. Our findings motivate recommendations for clinical care, described in detail below and summarized in Table 7.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7: Recommendations for clinical care for individuals with 3q29 deletion syndrome

Almost 60% of subjects reported ocular manifestations, the most frequently occurring ocular manifestations were strabismus and refractive errors, including myopia and astigmatism. In some cases, the strabismus required surgical repair. The high rate of ocular manifestations is consistent with previous reports2 and suggests the importance of involving a pediatric ophthalmologist at time of diagnosis for standard treatment of refractive errors and strabismus.

Similar to prior reports2, 3, 7, recurrent ear infections were common among study subjects and sometimes required myringotomy tubes. Epistaxis has not been previously reported but was commonly seen in a little over 20% of subjects without a concurrent history of nose picking. Two of the seven cases required surgery, one of which had developed anemia. The high rates of ear infections and epistaxis suggest a low threshold for involving ENT in care. When taken together with increased risk for speech-language disorders, these results further highlight the importance of hearing screening to monitor for conductive hearing loss and associated disruptions to speech-language development.

Consistent with reports of dental anomalies in the literature2, 3, 7, parents of 41% of subjects in our study reported a broad spectrum of dental anomalies, such as abnormal tooth shape, size, and number, diastema, enamel hypoplasia, and frequent cavities. In some cases, extensive surgical intervention was required, including up to 5 root canals in a single individual. Cavities occurred despite parent reported good oral hygiene. Notably, our study and others2, 3, 16 report dental anomalies along with gastroesophageal reflux, which may contribute to dental problems. Regardless, the high frequency of dental problems among individuals with 3q29 deletion highlights the need for early and ongoing dental care by a pediatric dentist, which may include increased frequency of routine check-ups and cleanings along with education in dental hygiene.

Previous literature draws attention to elevated rates of heart defects in individuals with 3q29 deletion2, 3, 16. Our findings confirm this increased risk. Structural cardiovascular manifestations were reported in almost half of subjects. Almost all manifestations were heart defects ranging in severity from PDA to hypoplastic right heart syndrome. No single common congenital heart defect was observed. One subject had a large AVM originating from the descending aorta, which was incidentally found on imaging for back pain. Of note, however, is that this subject also had an additional loss of 188 kb in 7q31.31 of uncertain significance that included only 1 OMIM gene, KCND2. To date AVMs have not typically been associated with KCND2 or described in 3q29, thus it is unclear whether this AVM is related to 3q29. Additional genetic testing was not performed. Regardless, it is important to note that half of subjects with a cardiovascular manifestation required surgical repair, suggesting the need for echocardiogram at diagnosis, if not previously done.

Gastrointestinal manifestations occurred in 81% of subjects and are noted as early as infancy. Feeding difficulties in infancy, manifesting as problems with latching to the breast and sucking, were sometimes associated with failure to gain weight and were common presenting signs. Feeding difficulties, coupled with reflux and constipation, and less frequently, dysphagia and esophageal dysmotility, persisted beyond infancy. Three subjects needed gastrostomy tubes beyond infancy due to restrictive food preferences and failure to thrive. It is unclear how much feeding problems may contribute to the observed smaller height and lower weight as documented in growth parameters (discussed subsequently) and/or whether these subjects are constitutionally smaller.

Occurring in 22% of subjects, enuresis was the most common renal/genitourinary manifestation reported. The subjects with a diagnosis of enuresis ranged in age from 6 to 16.9 years, suggesting that enuresis continues beyond the age in which it often resolves spontaneously. Enuresis is typically diagnosed more commonly among males than females in the general population.

However, this sex difference was not apparent among our subjects, 4 of whom were male and 3 of whom were female, which supports the notion that the 3q29 deletion contributes to enuresis. Indeed, prior case studies report a 15-year-old male2 and an 8-year-old female13 with urinary voiding dysfunction. Although varied by age and gender, the frequency of enuresis is reported to be 2.8% for children ages 6-14 years in the general population, indicating an approximately 9-fold enrichment among our study subjects and may require behavioral or pharmacological intervention.

A constellation of respiratory, allergy, and immunological symptoms were reported among study subjects. We observed 19% of our study subjects had asthma, 16% had seasonal allergies, and 13% had food allergies. The rate of asthma and food allergies are higher than the rates reported in the general population52, 53. Although the rates of seasonal allergy did not exceed the rate of 10-20% in the general population54, these results taken together suggest a tendency to atopy. Moreover, common skin manifestations reported among study subjects included eczema and keratosis pilaris, both of which are also associated with atopy. Early evaluation and routine follow-up with a pediatric pulmonologist or allergist may be important for ongoing care.

Although not previously reported in the literature, sleep disturbances were reported in 31% of subjects and ranged from difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep to reporting sleep walking and sleep apnea. Sleep disturbances can co-occur with other diagnoses, such as enuresis55. Interestingly, half of the subjects in our cohort with enuresis also had a sleep disturbance. Diagnosis and management of sleep disorders, particularly among subjects with other co-morbidities, may lead to improvement in multiple areas.

Based upon growth parameters, preliminary analyses were conducted to explore the effect of sex and age on height and weight. Results for height and weight suggest there may be a sex by age interaction. Male children are only slightly shorter than the mean, but by adulthood are shorter as compared to the mean than they were as children. In contrast, females move in the opposite direction: they are short as children but move to the population average as adults. In adulthood, males with 3q29 deletion are shorter (relative to expectations) than females (p value 0.01). At young ages, females weight less than expected but catch up in adulthood. Males move in the opposite direction: They are closer to the mean as children and by adulthood weigh less than expected. Only an age effect was noted for head circumference. Children with 3q29 deletion (males and females) have an FOC that is well below the population mean, but by adulthood this effect is ameliorated.

There is a substantial burden of disability contributed by neurodevelopmental and psychiatric manifestations. Cognitive disability is present but mild to moderate in most of the study subjects we evaluated. However, there is likely a cumulative impact of diminished cognitive ability alongside multiple comorbidities, including autism spectrum disorder, executive function deficits, anxiety disorders, and ADHD, that impair functioning and are a threat to successful social and occupational functioning. The high rate of graphomotor weakness indicates that writing and other fine motor tasks may be effortful and introduce challenges in academic settings. Occupational therapy may be helpful. Creative classroom solutions to alleviate the burden of writing tasks may decrease stress in these settings.

The high rate of ADHD, anxiety disorders, and schizophrenia/psychosis indicate that a child/adolescent psychiatrist should be part of the medical team, with periodic evaluation throughout development to detect emerging symptoms. Early intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy may be effective for anxiety disorders. Anxiety disorders, ADHD, and psychosis may require control with pharmaceutical agents. Because of the risk of psychosis associated with the 3q29 deletion, it is recommended that stimulant use for ADHD treatment be avoided if possible.

Limitations of this study include the small sample size, though we note that 32 study subjects is a relatively large sample size given the low frequency (1 in 30,000) of 3q29 deletion syndrome.

However, this sample size allows us to describe only the most common manifestations of the syndrome; a larger sample size mat reveal lower frequency symptoms Because our study required travel to Atlanta GA, this may have introduced some ascertainment bias toward subjects who were healthy enough to travel; subjects with behavioral challenges may not have participated. Because this sample is relatively young (average age 14.5 years) we have limited ability to describe later onset symptoms of the syndrome. Future directions will include a larger sample size and longitudinal evaluation.

In conclusion, many of the medical, neurodevelopmental, and psychiatric findings, although frequent, are nonspecific. Many symptoms noted require medical intervention, but do not necessarily signal the need for genetic testing. As a result, in individuals with 3q29 deletion syndrome, the need for genetic testing may be easily overlooked in the absence of other major congenital anomalies, thus getting to diagnosis remains a challenge. Taking into account the whole constellation of symptoms, including developmental and neuropsychiatric manifestations, are necessary to ensure patient access to genetic testing. Once 3q29 deletion syndrome is diagnosed, the findings and recommendations in the current study provide clinicians and families a road map toward effective strategies for care and treatment for individuals with 3q29 deletion syndrome.

Data Availability

Data from this manuscript are available in NDAR: https://nda.nih.gov/about.html

Acknowledgements

3q29 project members

NIH grants R01 MH110701 and R01 MH118534.

The 3q29 community

The Marcus Autism Center

Please note that any publication that results from a project utilizing REDCap should cite grant support (UL1 TR000424))

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pagon RA,
    2. Adam MP,
    3. Ardinger HH,
    4. Wallace SE,
    5. Amemiya A,
    6. Bean Ljh,
    7. Bird TD,
    8. Ledbetter N,
    9. Mefford HC,
    10. Smith Rjh,
    11. Stephens K
    Mulle JG, Gambello MJ, Cook EH, Rutkowski TP, Glassford M. 3q29 Recurrent Deletion. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean Ljh, Bird TD, Ledbetter N, Mefford HC, Smith Rjh, Stephens K, editors. GeneReviews(R). Seattle (WA)1993.
  2. 2.↵
    Cox DM, Butler MG. A clinical case report and literature review of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome. Clinical dysmorphology. 2015;24(3):89–94. Epub 2015/02/26. doi: 10.1097/MCD.0000000000000077. PubMed PMID: 25714563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Glassford MR, Rosenfeld JA, Freedman AA, Zwick ME, Mulle JG, Unique Rare Chromosome Disorder Support G. Novel features of 3q29 deletion syndrome: Results from the 3q29 registry. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2016;170(4):999–1006. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37537. PubMed PMID: 26738761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Pollak RM, Murphy MM, Epstein MP, Zwick ME, Klaiman C, Saulnier CA, Emory 3q P, Mulle JG. Neuropsychiatric phenotypes and a distinct constellation of ASD features in 3q29 deletion syndrome: results from the 3q29 registry. Mol Autism. 2019;10:30. Epub 2019/07/28. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0281-5. PubMed PMID: 31346402; PMCID: PMC6636128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Marshall CR, Howrigan DP, Merico D, Thiruvahindrapuram B, Wu W, Greer DS, Antaki D, Shetty A, Holmans PA, Pinto D, Gujral M, Brandler WM, Malhotra D, Wang Z, Fajarado KVF, Maile MS, Ripke S, Agartz I, Albus M, Alexander M, Amin F, Atkins J, Bacanu SA, Belliveau RA, Jr., Bergen SE, Bertalan M, Bevilacqua E, Bigdeli TB, Black DW, Bruggeman R, Buccola NG, Buckner RL, Bulik-Sullivan B, Byerley W, Cahn W, Cai G, Cairns MJ, Campion D, Cantor RM, Carr VJ, Carrera N, Catts SV, Chambert KD, Cheng W, Cloninger CR, Cohen D, Cormican P, Craddock N, Crespo-Facorro B, Crowley JJ, Curtis D, Davidson M, Davis KL, Degenhardt F, Del Favero J, DeLisi LE, Dikeos D, Dinan T, Djurovic S, Donohoe G, Drapeau E, Duan J, Dudbridge F, Eichhammer P, Eriksson J, Escott-Price V, Essioux L, Fanous AH, Farh KH, Farrell MS, Frank J, Franke L, Freedman R, Freimer NB, Friedman JI, Forstner AJ, Fromer M, Genovese G, Georgieva L, Gershon ES, Giegling I, Giusti-Rodriguez P, Godard S, Goldstein JI, Gratten J, de Haan L, Hamshere ML, Hansen M, Hansen T, Haroutunian V, Hartmann AM, Henskens FA, Herms S, Hirschhorn JN, Hoffmann P, Hofman A, Huang H, Ikeda M, Joa I, Kahler AK, Kahn RS, Kalaydjieva L, Karjalainen J, Kavanagh D, Keller MC, Kelly BJ, Kennedy JL, Kim Y, Knowles JA, Konte B, Laurent C, Lee P, Lee SH, Legge SE, Lerer B, Levy DL, Liang KY, Lieberman J, Lonnqvist J, Loughland CM, Magnusson PKE, Maher BS, Maier W, Mallet J, Mattheisen M, Mattingsdal M, McCarley RW, McDonald C, McIntosh AM, Meier S, Meijer CJ, Melle I, Mesholam-Gately RI, Metspalu A, Michie PT, Milani L, Milanova V, Mokrab Y, Morris DW, Muller-Myhsok B, Murphy KC, Murray RM, Myin-Germeys I, Nenadic I, Nertney DA, Nestadt G, Nicodemus KK, Nisenbaum L, Nordin A, O’Callaghan E, O’Dushlaine C, Oh SY, Olincy A, Olsen L, O’Neill FA, Van Os J, Pantelis C, Papadimitriou GN, Parkhomenko E, Pato MT, Paunio T, Psychosis Endophenotypes International C, Perkins DO, Pers TH, Pietilainen O, Pimm J, Pocklington AJ, Powell J, Price A, Pulver AE, Purcell SM, Quested D, Rasmussen HB, Reichenberg A, Reimers MA, Richards AL, Roffman JL, Roussos P, Ruderfer DM, Salomaa V, Sanders AR, Savitz A, Schall U, Schulze TG, Schwab SG, Scolnick EM, Scott RJ, Seidman LJ, Shi J, Silverman JM, Smoller JW, Soderman E, Spencer CCA, Stahl EA, Strengman E, Strohmaier J, Stroup TS, Suvisaari J, Svrakic DM, Szatkiewicz JP, Thirumalai S, Tooney PA, Veijola J, Visscher PM, Waddington J, Walsh D, Webb BT, Weiser M, Wildenauer DB, Williams NM, Williams S, Witt SH, Wolen AR, Wormley BK, Wray NR, Wu JQ, Zai CC, Adolfsson R, Andreassen OA, Blackwood DHR, Bramon E, Buxbaum JD, Cichon S, Collier DA, Corvin A, Daly MJ, Darvasi A, Domenici E, Esko T, Gejman PV, Gill M, Gurling H, Hultman CM, Iwata N, Jablensky AV, Jonsson EG, Kendler KS, Kirov G, Knight J, Levinson DF, Li QS, McCarroll SA, McQuillin A, Moran JL, Mowry BJ, Nothen MM, Ophoff RA, Owen MJ, Palotie A, Pato CN, Petryshen TL, Posthuma D, Rietschel M, Riley BP, Rujescu D, Sklar P, St Clair D, Walters JTR, Werge T, Sullivan PF, O’Donovan MC, Scherer SW, Neale BM, Sebat J, Cnv, Schizophrenia Working Groups of the Psychiatric Genomics C. Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects. Nature genetics. 2017;49(1):27–35. Epub 2016/11/22. doi: 10.1038/ng.3725. PubMed PMID: 27869829; PMCID: PMC5737772.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Mulle JG. The 3q29 deletion confers >40-fold increase in risk for schizophrenia. Molecular psychiatry. 2015;20(9):1028–9. Epub 2015/06/10. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.76. PubMed PMID: 26055425; PMCID: 4546529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Ballif BC, Theisen A, Coppinger J, Gowans GC, Hersh JH, Madan-Khetarpal S, Schmidt KR, Tervo R, Escobar LF, Friedrich CA, McDonald M, Campbell L, Ming JE, Zackai EH, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. Expanding the clinical phenotype of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome and characterization of the reciprocal microduplication. Molecular cytogenetics. 2008;1:8. Epub 2008/05/13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-1-8. PubMed PMID: 18471269; PMCID: 2408925.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    Willatt L, Cox J, Barber J, Cabanas ED, Collins A, Donnai D, FitzPatrick DR, Maher E, Martin H, Parnau J, Pindar L, Ramsay J, Shaw-Smith C, Sistermans EA, Tettenborn M, Trump D, de Vries BB, Walker K, Raymond FL. 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: clinical and molecular characterization of a new syndrome. American journal of human genetics. 2005;77(1):154–60. Epub 2005/05/27. doi: 10.1086/431653. PubMed PMID: 15918153; PMCID: 1226188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.
    Cobb W, Anderson A, Turner C, Hoffman RD, Schonberg S, Levin SW. 1.3 Mb de novo deletion in chromosome band 3q29 associated with normal intelligence in a child. Eur J Med Genet. 2010;53(6):415–8. Epub 2010/09/14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.08.009. PubMed PMID: 20832509.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    Baynam G, Goldblatt J, Townshend S. A case of 3q29 microdeletion with novel features and a review of cytogenetically visible terminal 3q deletions. Clin Dysmorphol. 2006;15(3):145–8. Epub 2006/06/09. doi: 10.1097/01.mcd.0000198934.55071.ee. PubMed PMID: 16760732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.
    Citta S, Buono S, Greco D, Barone C, Alfei E, Bulgheroni S, Usilla A, Pantaleoni C, Romano C. 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: Cognitive and behavioral phenotype in four patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(12):3018–22. Epub 2013/11/12. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36142. PubMed PMID: 24214349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    Clayton-Smith J, Giblin C, Smith RA, Dunn C, Willatt L. Familial 3q29 microdeletion syndrome providing further evidence of involvement of the 3q29 region in bipolar disorder. Clin Dysmorphol. 2010;19(3):128–32. Epub 2010/05/11. doi: 10.1097/MCD.0b013e32833a1e3c. PubMed PMID: 20453639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Dasouki MJ, Lushington GH, Hovanes K, Casey J, Gorre M. The 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: report of three new unrelated patients and in silico “RNA binding” analysis of the 3q29 region. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(7):1654–60. Epub 2011/06/01. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34080. PubMed PMID: 21626679; PMCID: PMC3312009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    Digilio MC, Bernardini L, Mingarelli R, Capolino R, Capalbo A, Giuffrida MG, Versacci P, Novelli A, Dallapiccola B. 3q29 Microdeletion: a mental retardation disorder unassociated with a recognizable phenotype in two mother-daughter pairs. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(8):1777–81. Epub 2009/07/18. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32965. PubMed PMID: 19610115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    Khan WA, Cohen N, Scott SA, Pereira EM. Familial inheritance of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: case report and review. BMC Med Genomics. 2019;12(1):51. Epub 2019/03/20. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0497-4. PubMed PMID: 30885185; PMCID: PMC6421695.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Li F, Lisi EC, Wohler ES, Hamosh A, Batista DA. 3q29 interstitial microdeletion syndrome: an inherited case associated with cardiac defect and normal cognition. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52(5):349–52. Epub 2009/05/23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.05.001. PubMed PMID: 19460468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    Monfort S, Rosello M, Orellana C, Oltra S, Blesa D, Kok K, Ferrer I, Cigudosa JC, Martinez F. Detection of known and novel genomic rearrangements by array based comparative genomic hybridisation: deletion of ZNF533 and duplication of CHARGE syndrome genes. J Med Genet. 2008;45(7):432–7. Epub 2008/04/17. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.057596. PubMed PMID: 18413373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.
    Petrin AL, Daack-Hirsch S, L’Heureux J, Murray JC. A case of 3q29 microdeletion syndrome involving oral cleft inherited from a nonaffected mosaic parent: molecular analysis and ethical implications. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(2):222–30. Epub 2010/05/27. doi: 10.1597/09-149. PubMed PMID: 20500065; PMCID: PMC2964377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    Quintero-Rivera F, Sharifi-Hannauer P, Martinez-Agosto JA. Autistic and psychiatric findings associated with the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: case report and review. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2010;152A(10):2459–67. Epub 2010/09/11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33573. PubMed PMID: 20830797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Sagar A, Bishop JR, Tessman DC, Guter S, Martin CL, Cook EH. Co-occurrence of autism, childhood psychosis, and intellectual disability associated with a de novo 3q29 microdeletion. American journal of medical genetics Part A. 2013;161A(4):845–9. Epub 2013/02/28. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35754. PubMed PMID: 23443968; PMCID: 3685481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    Tyshchenko N, Hackmann K, Gerlach EM, Neuhann T, Schrock E, Tinschert S. 1.6Mb deletion in chromosome band 3q29 associated with eye abnormalities. Eur J Med Genet. 2009;52(2-3):128–30. Epub 2009/03/21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.03.002. PubMed PMID: 19298871.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    Rossi E, Piccini F, Zollino M, Neri G, Caselli D, Tenconi R, Castellan C, Carrozzo R, Danesino C, Zuffardi O, Ragusa A, Castiglia L, Galesi O, Greco D, Romano C, Pierluigi M, Perfumo C, Di Rocco M, Faravelli F, Dagna Bricarelli F, Bonaglia M, Bedeschi M, Borgatti R. Cryptic telomeric rearrangements in subjects with mental retardation associated with dysmorphism and congenital malformations. J Med Genet. 2001;38(6):417–20. Epub 2001/06/27. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.6.417. PubMed PMID: 11424927; PMCID: PMC1734891.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    Koolen DA, Nillesen WM, Versteeg MH, Merkx GF, Knoers NV, Kets M, Vermeer S, van Ravenswaaij CM, de Kovel CG, Brunner HG, Smeets D, de Vries BB, Sistermans EA. Screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in 210 patients with unexplained mental retardation using multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA). J Med Genet. 2004;41(12):892–9. Epub 2004/12/14. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.023671. PubMed PMID: 15591274; PMCID: PMC1735655.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    Krepischi-Santos AC, Vianna-Morgante AM, Jehee FS, Passos-Bueno MR, Knijnenburg J, Szuhai K, Sloos W, Mazzeu JF, Kok F, Cheroki C, Otto PA, Mingroni-Netto RC, Varela M, Koiffmann C, Kim CA, Bertola DR, Pearson PL, Rosenberg C. Whole-genome array-CGH screening in undiagnosed syndromic patients: old syndromes revisited and new alterations. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(3-4):254–61. Epub 2006/11/25. doi: 10.1159/000095922. PubMed PMID: 17124408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.
    Malt EA, Juhasz K, Frengen A, Wangensteen T, Emilsen NM, Hansen B, Agafonov O, Nilsen HL. Neuropsychiatric phenotype in relation to gene variants in the hemizygous allele in 3q29 deletion carriers: A case series. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(9):e889. Epub 2019/07/28. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.889. PubMed PMID: 31347308; PMCID: PMC6732294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    Shao L, Shaw CA, Lu XY, Sahoo T, Bacino CA, Lalani SR, Stankiewicz P, Yatsenko SA, Li Y, Neill S, Pursley AN, Chinault AC, Patel A, Beaudet AL, Lupski JR, Cheung SW. Identification of chromosome abnormalities in subtelomeric regions by microarray analysis: a study of 5,380 cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(17):2242–51. Epub 2008/07/30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32399. PubMed PMID: 18663743; PMCID: PMC2680131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Murphy MM, Burrell TL, Cubells JF, Epstein MT, Espana R, Gambello MJ, Goines K, Klaiman C, Koh S, Russo RS, Saulnier CA, Walker E, Emory 3q P, Mulle JG. Comprehensive phenotyping of neuropsychiatric traits in a multiplex 3q29 deletion family: a case report. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):184. Epub 2020/04/24. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02598-w. PubMed PMID: 32321479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Coe BP, Stessman HAF, Sulovari A, Geisheker MR, Bakken TE, Lake AM, Dougherty JD, Lein ES, Hormozdiari F, Bernier RA, Eichler EE. Neurodevelopmental disease genes implicated by de novo mutation and copy number variation morbidity. Nature genetics. 2019;51(1):106–16. Epub 2018/12/19. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0288-4. PubMed PMID: 30559488; PMCID: PMC6309590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.
    Cooper GM, Coe BP, Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Vu TH, Baker C, Williams C, Stalker H, Hamid R, Hannig V, Abdel-Hamid H, Bader P, McCracken E, Niyazov D, Leppig K, Thiese H, Hummel M, Alexander N, Gorski J, Kussmann J, Shashi V, Johnson K, Rehder C, Ballif BC, Shaffer LG, Eichler EE. A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay. Nature genetics. 2011;43(9):838–46. Epub 2011/08/16. doi: 10.1038/ng.909. PubMed PMID: 21841781; PMCID: PMC3171215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Parikh S, Friedman N, Goldstein A, Filipink RA, McConnell JS, Angle B, Meschino WS, Nezarati MM, Asamoah A, Jackson KE, Gowans GC, Martin JA, Carmany EP, Stockton DW, Schnur RE, Penney LS, Martin DM, Raskin S, Leppig K, Thiese H, Smith R, Aberg E, Niyazov DM, Escobar LF, El-Khechen D, Johnson KD, Lebel RR, Siefkas K, Ball S, Shur N, McGuire M, Brasington CK, Spence JE, Martin LS, Clericuzio C, Ballif BC, Shaffer LG, Eichler EE. Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1321–31. Epub 2012/09/14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200395. PubMed PMID: 22970919; PMCID: PMC3494411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Kaminsky EB, Kaul V, Paschall J, Church DM, Bunke B, Kunig D, Moreno-De-Luca D, Moreno-De-Luca A, Mulle JG, Warren ST, Richard G, Compton JG, Fuller AE, Gliem TJ, Huang S, Collinson MN, Beal SJ, Ackley T, Pickering DL, Golden DM, Aston E, Whitby H, Shetty S, Rossi MR, Rudd MK, South ST, Brothman AR, Sanger WG, Iyer RK, Crolla JA, Thorland EC, Aradhya S, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Genet Med. 2011;13(9):777–84. Epub 2011/08/17. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31822c79f9. PubMed PMID: 21844811; PMCID: PMC3661946.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Sanders SJ, He X, Willsey AJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, Samocha KE, Cicek AE, Murtha MT, Bal VH, Bishop SL, Dong S, Goldberg AP, Jinlu C, Keaney JF, 3rd, Klei L, Mandell JD, Moreno-De-Luca D, Poultney CS, Robinson EB, Smith L, Solli-Nowlan T, Su MY, Teran NA, Walker MF, Werling DM, Beaudet AL, Cantor RM, Fombonne E, Geschwind DH, Grice DE, Lord C, Lowe JK, Mane SM, Martin DM, Morrow EM, Talkowski ME, Sutcliffe JS, Walsh CA, Yu TW, Autism Sequencing C, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL, Cook EH, Buxbaum JD, Daly MJ, Devlin B, Roeder K, State MW. Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Architecture and Biology from 71 Risk Loci. Neuron. 2015;87(6):1215–33. Epub 2015/09/25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.016. PubMed PMID: 26402605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Mulle JG, Dodd AF, McGrath JA, Wolyniec PS, Mitchell AA, Shetty AC, Sobreira NL, Valle D, Rudd MK, Satten G, Cutler DJ, Pulver AE, Warren ST. Microdeletions of 3q29 confer high risk for schizophrenia. American journal of human genetics. 2010;87(2):229–36. Epub 2010/08/10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.07.013. PubMed PMID: 20691406; PMCID: 2917706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.
    Szatkiewicz JP, O’Dushlaine C, Chen G, Chambert K, Moran JL, Neale BM, Fromer M, Ruderfer D, Akterin S, Bergen SE, Kahler A, Magnusson PK, Kim Y, Crowley JJ, Rees E, Kirov G, O’Donovan MC, Owen MJ, Walters J, Scolnick E, Sklar P, Purcell S, Hultman CM, McCarroll SA, Sullivan PF. Copy number variation in schizophrenia in Sweden. Molecular psychiatry. 2014;19(7):762–73. Epub 2014/04/30. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.40. PubMed PMID: 24776740; PMCID: 4271733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Levinson DF, Duan J, Oh S, Wang K, Sanders AR, Shi J, Zhang N, Mowry BJ, Olincy A, Amin F, Cloninger CR, Silverman JM, Buccola NG, Byerley WF, Black DW, Kendler KS, Freedman R, Dudbridge F, Pe’er I, Hakonarson H, Bergen SE, Fanous AH, Holmans PA, Gejman PV. Copy number variants in schizophrenia: confirmation of five previous findings and new evidence for 3q29 microdeletions and VIPR2 duplications. The American journal of psychiatry. 2011;168(3):302–16. Epub 2011/02/03. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060876. PubMed PMID: 21285140; PMCID: 4441324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Murphy MM, Lindsey Burrell T, Cubells JF, Espana RA, Gambello MJ, Goines KCB, Klaiman C, Li L, Novacek DM, Papetti A, Sanchez Russo RL, Saulnier CA, Shultz S, Walker E, Mulle JG. Study protocol for The Emory 3q29 Project: evaluation of neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and medical symptoms in 3q29 deletion syndrome. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):183. Epub 2018/06/10. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1760-5. PubMed PMID: 29884173; PMCID: PMC5994080.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    Hall JG, Allanson JE, Gripp KW, Slavotinek AM. Handbook of normal physical measurements. 2nd ed: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  38. 38.↵
    Elliott CD. Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.
  39. 39.↵
    Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. 2nd ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2011 2011.
  40. 40.↵
    Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Saulnier CA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3). San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2016.
  41. 41.↵
    Beery KE, Buktenica NA. The Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual–Motor Integration: Administration, scoring, and teaching manual (6th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson; 2010.
  42. 42.↵
    Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 1994;24(5):659–85. Epub 1994/10/01. PubMed PMID: 7814313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH, Jr.., Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, Pickles A, Rutter M. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 2000;30(3):205–23. Epub 2000/10/31. PubMed PMID: 11055457.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 2000.
  45. 45.↵
    Silverman W, Albano A. The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children–IV (Child and parent versions). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  46. 46.↵
    Silverman WK, Saavedra LM, Pina AA. Test-retest reliability of anxiety symptoms and diagnoses with the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: child and parent versions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001;40(8):937–44. Epub 2001/08/15. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200108000-00016. PubMed PMID: 11501694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL. User’s Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Research Version (SCID-5-RV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
  48. 48.↵
    Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997;36(7):980–8. Epub 1997/07/01. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021. PubMed PMID: 9204677.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, Cadenhead K, Cannon T, Ventura J, McFarlane W, Perkins DO, Pearlson GD, Woods SW. Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2003;29(4):703–15. Epub 2004/03/03. PubMed PMID: 14989408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Woods SW, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt BA, Heinssen R, Perkins DO, Seidman LJ, Tsuang MT, Walker EF, McGlashan TH. Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2009;35(5):894–908. Epub 2009/04/24. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp027. PubMed PMID: 19386578; PMCID: 2728816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year Principal I, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years -autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. Morbidity and mortality weekly report Surveillance summaries. 2014;63(2):1–21. Epub 2014/03/29. PubMed PMID: 24670961.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    Bousquet J, Bousquet PJ, Godard P, Daures JP. The public health implications of asthma. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(7):548–54. Epub 2005/09/24. PubMed PMID: 16175830; PMCID: PMC2626301.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Hill DA, Grundmeier RW, Ram G, Spergel JM. The epidemiologic characteristics of healthcare provider-diagnosed eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergy in children: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:133. Epub 2016/08/21. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0673-z. PubMed PMID: 27542726; PMCID: PMC4992234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Dykewicz MS, Hamilos DL. Rhinitis and sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2 Suppl 2):S103–15. Epub 2010/03/05. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.989. PubMed PMID: 20176255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Vasconcelos MMA, East P, Blanco E, Lukacz ES, Caballero G, Lozoff B, Gahagan S. Early Behavioral Risks of Childhood and Adolescent Daytime Urinary Incontinence and Nocturnal Enuresis. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017;38(9):736–42. Epub 2017/10/19. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000516. PubMed PMID: 29045258; PMCID: PMC5679404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 28, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care
Rossana Sanchez Russo, Michael J. Gambello, Melissa M. Murphy, Katrina Aberizk, Emily Black, T. Lindsey Burrell, Grace Carlock, Joseph F. Cubells, Michael T. Epstein, Roberto Espana, Katrina Goines, Ryan Guest, Cheryl Klaiman, Sookyong Koh, Elizabeth Leslie, Longchuan Li, Derek Novacek, Celine A. Saulnier, Esra Sefik, Sarah Schultz, Elaine Walker, Stormi White, The Emory 3q29 Project, Jennifer Gladys Mulle
medRxiv 2020.07.25.20162149; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20162149
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care
Rossana Sanchez Russo, Michael J. Gambello, Melissa M. Murphy, Katrina Aberizk, Emily Black, T. Lindsey Burrell, Grace Carlock, Joseph F. Cubells, Michael T. Epstein, Roberto Espana, Katrina Goines, Ryan Guest, Cheryl Klaiman, Sookyong Koh, Elizabeth Leslie, Longchuan Li, Derek Novacek, Celine A. Saulnier, Esra Sefik, Sarah Schultz, Elaine Walker, Stormi White, The Emory 3q29 Project, Jennifer Gladys Mulle
medRxiv 2020.07.25.20162149; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.25.20162149

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)