Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Risk stratification as a tool to rationalize quarantine among health care workers exposed to COVID-19 cases – Evidence from a tertiary healthcare centre in India

View ORCID ProfileRavneet Kaur, Shashi Kant, View ORCID ProfileMohan Bairwa, Arvind Kumar, Shivram Dhakad, D Vignesh, Aftab Ahmad, Pooja Pandey, Arti Kapil, View ORCID ProfileRakesh Lodha, View ORCID ProfileNaveet Wig
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20166264
Ravneet Kaur
1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ravneet Kaur
Shashi Kant
1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohan Bairwa
1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mohan Bairwa
  • For correspondence: drmohanbairwa{at}gmail.com
Arvind Kumar
2Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shivram Dhakad
3Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Vignesh
1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aftab Ahmad
1Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pooja Pandey
3Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arti Kapil
3Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Lodha
4Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rakesh Lodha
Naveet Wig
2Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Naveet Wig
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Quarantine of healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to COVID -19 confirmed cases is a well-known strategy for limiting the transmission of infection. However, there is need of evidence-based guidelines for quarantine of HCWs in COVID -19.

Methods We describe our experience of contact tracing and risk stratification of 3853 HCWs who were exposed to confirmed COVID-19 cases in a tertiary health care institution in India. We developed an algorithm, on the basis of risk stratification, to rationalize quarantine among HCWs. Risk stratification was based on the duration of exposure, distance from the patient, and appropriateness of personal protection equipment (PPE) usage. Only high-risk contacts were quarantined for 14 days. They underwent testing for COVID-19 after five days of exposure, while low-risk contacts continued their work with adherence to physical distancing, hand hygiene, and appropriate use of PPE. The low-risk contacts were encouraged to monitor for symptoms and report for COVID-19 screening if fever, cough, or shortness of breath occurred. We followed up all contacts for 14 days from the last exposure and observed for symptoms of COVID-19 and test positivity.

Results and interpretation Out of total 3853 contacts, 560 (14.5%) were categorized as high-risk contacts, and 40 of them were detected positive for COVID-19, with a test positivity rate of 7.1% (95% CI = 5.2 – 9.6). Overall, 118 (3.1%) of all contacts tested positive. Our strategy prevented 3215 HCWs from being quarantined and saved 45,010 person-days of health workforce until June 8, 2020, in the institution.

We conclude that exposure-based risk stratification and quarantine of HCWs is a viable strategy to prevent unnecessary quarantine, in a healthcare institution.

What is already known about this subject?

  • Quarantine of HCWs is a well-known strategy for community and HCWs to prevent the transmission of COVID-19.

  • Though success stories of prompt contact tracing and quarantine to control COVID-19 are available from countries like South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong, there is a scarcity of evidence that could guide targeted quarantine of HCWs exposed to COVID -19 in India.

What does this study add?

  • Only 14.5% HCWs exposed to COVID-19 cases were stratified “high risk” contacts, and the most common reason for high-risk contacts was non-formal workplace interactions such as having meals together.

  • The overall test positivity rate among the high-risk contacts was 7.1%, while it was higher in symptomatic high-risk contacts as compared to those who were asymptomatic (10.2% vs. 6.3%).

How might this impact on clinical practice?

  • Contact tracing and risk stratification can be used to minimize unnecessary quarantine of COVID-19 exposed health care workers and prevent the depletion of healthcare workers amidst the pandemic to continue the healthcare services optimally.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Although, this study was not funded, the tests of contacts were conducted in the virology laboratory at AIIMS, New Delhi. The virology laboratory at AIIMS is a Department of Health Research (DHR)/ Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) funded Regional Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (R-VRDL).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Institute Ethics Committee, AIIMS, New Delhi

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Email: ravneetk08{at}gmail.com

  • Email: skant76{at}gmail.com

  • Email: drmohanbairwa{at}gmail.com

  • Email: linktoarvind{at}gmail.com

  • Email: dhakad.shivramaiims{at}gmail.com

  • Email: d.vignesh1991{at}gmail.com

  • Email: aftab.ind{at}gmail.com

  • Email: pooja_kmc20{at}yahoo.co.in

  • Email: akapilmicro{at}aiims.edu

  • Email: rakesh_lodha{at}hotmail.com

  • Email: naveetwig{at}gmail.com

Data Availability

Data are available on request. Deidentified data will be made available on request from a bona fide research institute or entity for use in a valid research study. Requests should be made via email to Ravneet Kaur (ravneetk08{at}gmail.com).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 04, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk stratification as a tool to rationalize quarantine among health care workers exposed to COVID-19 cases – Evidence from a tertiary healthcare centre in India
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Risk stratification as a tool to rationalize quarantine among health care workers exposed to COVID-19 cases – Evidence from a tertiary healthcare centre in India
Ravneet Kaur, Shashi Kant, Mohan Bairwa, Arvind Kumar, Shivram Dhakad, D Vignesh, Aftab Ahmad, Pooja Pandey, Arti Kapil, Rakesh Lodha, Naveet Wig
medRxiv 2020.07.31.20166264; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20166264
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Risk stratification as a tool to rationalize quarantine among health care workers exposed to COVID-19 cases – Evidence from a tertiary healthcare centre in India
Ravneet Kaur, Shashi Kant, Mohan Bairwa, Arvind Kumar, Shivram Dhakad, D Vignesh, Aftab Ahmad, Pooja Pandey, Arti Kapil, Rakesh Lodha, Naveet Wig
medRxiv 2020.07.31.20166264; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20166264

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)