ABSTRACT
Computed tomography (CT) is one of the most common medical imaging modalities and the main technology used in radiomics research, the computational voxel-level analysis of medical images. Analysis of CT images is vulnerable to the effects of dental artifacts (DA) caused by metal implants or fillings. Running automated analysis pipelines with uncurated datasets can reduce performance and hamper future reproducibility on new datasets. This work introduces a new tool to detect the location and magnitude of DAs in CT images based on a combination of deep learning and conventional image processing algorithms. We show the utility of this new DA detector through an analysis of the correlations between radiomic features and the location of DAs in 2,319 CT axial volumes. We were able to predict the correct DA magnitude (no, weak or strong artifacts) yielding a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.73 (p-value=0.0002), achieving the same level of agreement as human labellers. The algorithm was able to identify the location of the DAs in the CT volumes with performance on par with human labellers. Finally, our analysis of radiomic features showed that only when strong DAs were present, the proximity of the tumour to the mouth was highly correlated with specific radiomic features. Our results suggest that removing these features, or removing CT slices containing the DAs, could reduce these unwanted correlations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
17-5871
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) radiomics grant (# 426366). At no time did the authors or their institutions receive payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada's (PHAC) Research Ethics Board (REB), approval #17-5871.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The application we created to manually annotate images, Artifact Labelling Tool for Artifact Reduction (ALTAR) can be downloaded from our GitHub repository (https://github.com/bhklab/ALTAR). The code for the SBD, CNN, and thresholding location detection is open source (Creative Commons Non-Commercial) and freely available from on our DAART GitHub repository (https://github.com/bhklab/DA-Detection). To ensure full reproducibility of our study we created a Code Ocean capsule to allow users to easily run and reuse our analysis pipeline (https://codeocean.com/capsule/2097894/tree).
https://github.com/bhklab/ALTAR
