Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Practice of Hyperglycaemia Control in Intensive Care Units of the Military Hospital, Sudan – Needs of a Protocol

Ghada Omer Hamad Abd El-Raheem, Mudawi Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah, Mounkaila Noma
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176453
Ghada Omer Hamad Abd El-Raheem
1Intensive Care Unit, Military Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. & University of Medical Sciences and Technology UMST, High Diploma in Research Methodology and Biostatistics, Khartoum, Sudan. P.O. Box 12810, Mecca street, Khartoum, Sudan, E-mail: . Phone numbers: +249922572830 / + 249902623636
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ghadaomer90{at}gmail.com ghadaomer90{at}gmail.com
Mudawi Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mounkaila Noma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Hyperglycaemia is a major risk factor in critically ill patients as it leads to adverse outcomes and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The target blood glucose remained controversial; this study aimed to contribute in assessing the practice of hyperglycaemia control in intensive care units of Khartoum Military Hospital. Furthermore, it proposed a protocol for hyperglycaemia control based on findings. A hospital-based cross-sectional study assessed the awareness and practice towards hyperglycaemia management in a sample of 83 healthcare staff selected through stratified random sampling technique. In addition, 55 patients were enrolled, through quota sampling, after excluding those with diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar-hyperglycaemic state and patients < 18 years. A self-administrated questionnaire enabled to collect data from healthcare staff, patients data were extracted from medical records. SPSS 23 was used to analyse the collected data. Chi-square and ANOVA tests assessed the association among variables. All statistical tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. The training on hyperglycaemia control differed statistically (p = 0.017) among healthcare staff. The target glycaemic level (140-180 mg/dl) was knew by 11.1% of the study participants. Neither the knowledge nor the practice of hyperglycaemia control methods differed among staff (p> 0.05). The use of sliding scale was 79.3% across the ICUs with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002). 31.5% of patients had received glycaemic control based on different methods and 11.8% were in the targeted blood glucose level. Sliding scale was the prevalent method used by doctors (71.4%) and nurses (81.6%). A patient benefited from insulin infusion method, which achieved the NICE-SUGAR target. The poor knowledge and lack of awareness towards hyperglycaemia monitoring led to inappropriate implementation of glycaemia control methods across the Military Hospital ICUs. Sustained training programs on hyperglycaemia control to ICU staff and the availability of a protocol on glycaemia control are highly required.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Ghada Omer Hamad Abd El-Raheem bore all the cost related to the study in the framework of her thesis for the post-graduate Diploma in Research methodology and Biostatistics in the University of Medical Sciences and Technology.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

SUMASRI Institutional Review Board of the University of Medical Sciences and Technology reviewed the proposal. Ethical Approval was obtained from the Military Hospital, the implementation of the research was granted by the administration of the respective ICUs. Participants (doctors, nurses and patients) were well informed about the research objectives and verbal consent was obtained from each of them. They were ensured about their confidentiality with the use of an anonymous research tool and that the data collected from them would be used strictly for the purpose of the study objectives.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

To support data sharing and in compliance with MedRxiv data policy, all the data used in the framework of this research is deposit

  • Abbreviations

    AACE
    American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
    ACP
    American College of Physicians
    ADA
    American Diabetes Association
    BG
    Blood glucose
    CCR
    Critical Care Room
    CCU
    Cardiac Care Unit
    CGM
    Continuous Glucose Monitoring
    ICU
    Intensive Care Unit
    IIT
    Intensive Insulin Therapy
    NICE-SUGAR
    The Normoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation – Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation
    NUH
    Nottingham University Hospitals
    POC
    point of care
    SCCM
    Society of Critical Care Medicine
    SGC
    Space Glucose Control
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted August 19, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Practice of Hyperglycaemia Control in Intensive Care Units of the Military Hospital, Sudan – Needs of a Protocol
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Practice of Hyperglycaemia Control in Intensive Care Units of the Military Hospital, Sudan – Needs of a Protocol
    Ghada Omer Hamad Abd El-Raheem, Mudawi Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah, Mounkaila Noma
    medRxiv 2020.08.17.20176453; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176453
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Practice of Hyperglycaemia Control in Intensive Care Units of the Military Hospital, Sudan – Needs of a Protocol
    Ghada Omer Hamad Abd El-Raheem, Mudawi Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah, Mounkaila Noma
    medRxiv 2020.08.17.20176453; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176453

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)