Testing for coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in populations with low infection prevalence: the largely ignored problem of false positives and the value of repeat testing

Cathie Sudlow, Peter Diggle, Oliver Warlow, David Seymour, Ben Gordon, Rhos Walker, Charles Warlow
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.20178137

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.20178137
History 
  • August 22, 2020.
Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Cathie Sudlow1,2,3,*,
  2. Peter Diggle4,5,
  3. Oliver Warlow6,
  4. David Seymour5,
  5. Ben Gordon5,
  6. Rhos Walker5 and
  7. Charles Warlow3
  1. 1Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh
  2. 2British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK
  3. 3Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh
  4. 4University of Lancaster
  5. 5Health Data Research UK
  6. 6Ventient Energy
  1. ↵*Correspondence to: Prof Cathie Sudlow, BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK cathie.sudlow{at}hdruk.ac.uk
Back to top
Posted August 22, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Testing for coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in populations with low infection prevalence: the largely ignored problem of false positives and the value of repeat testing
Cathie Sudlow, Peter Diggle, Oliver Warlow, David Seymour, Ben Gordon, Rhos Walker, Charles Warlow
medRxiv 2020.08.19.20178137; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.20178137
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area