Face-masking, an acceptable protective measure against COVID-19 - Findings of Ugandan high-risk groups

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute-respiratory infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), that spreads mainly through respiratory droplets and secretions (1,2). The disease was first reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province of China in December 2019 (3). COVID-19 transmission can occur directly via contact with infected individuals or indirectly via contact with surfaces in their immediate environment or objects used on or by those infected (1,4—6). In specific circumstances and settings particularly where procedures that generate aerosols are performed, airborne transmission of COVID-19 could be possible (7-9). The spread of COVID-19 via aerosols even in the absence of aerosol generating procedures could also be possible (7-9). To date, no clear treatment options have been reported for the virus and as such, treatments have been limited to the use of anti-HIV drugs and/or other anti-virals such as Galidesivir and Remdesivir (10).

To contain viral spread, several countries continue to utilize non-pharmaceutical public health interventions (11-13), including among others: (1) boarder control or closure, (2) partial- or complete-lockdown, (3) quarantine and testing of incoming travelers and returnees, and (4) mass testing for rapid case detection, contact tracing and quarantine (10). Additional measures, community mitigation strategies including among others: (1) mass media-based sensitization, (2) appealing to the masses to: unceasingly carry out good hygiene practices particularly hand washing, maintain appropriate social distance, stop all mass gatherings, cease all socioeconomic activities except essential services like security, food markets, health-care and wear face-masks also continue to be emphasized (10,14,15).

These measures have been implemented at different time points and to various degrees in different geographical areas to reduce the risk of community transmission of COVID-19 (10,14,15). Noteworthy, several of these measures had been used previously for the control of community transmission of the: (1) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003, (2) pandemic Influenza A H1N1 in 2009 (2,16,17), Ebola Viral Hemorrhagic Fever in West Africa in 2014 (18,19), as well as several viral hemorrhagic fever outbreaks over the years in Uganda (20).

Wearing of face-masks in public settings where social distancing measures are difficult to maintain, has been documented as one of the most critical prevention measure that can limit the acquisition and spread of COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC). In light of this, WHO and CDC have developed guidelines for the use of the same in these settings (21,22).

Previously published studies have shown that wearing of face-masks to control infectious diseases spread has several advantages that include among others: (1) simple operation, (2) strong sustainability, (3) high health benefits, and (4) good health economic benefits (23-25). Other previously published studies have also shown that use of face-masks by the general public is of potentially high value in limiting community transmission of infectious diseases (2,26-28). Likewise, the use of face-masks has also been documented to curb viral transmission by asymptomatic individuals and thus limiting the epidemic’s growth rate (28). With regards to limiting community spread of COVID-19, community-wide use of face-masks has been encouraged (29,30). Face-masks have also been suggested to serve as visible cues of an otherwise yet widely prevalent pathogen, SARS-CoV-2, and as tools that could be utilized to remind people of the importance of the other infection-control measures such as social distancing (31). Face-masks have also been documented to be symbolic, beyond them being tools, they have been described as talismans that could increase health-care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their health-care settings (31). Similar to a few other countries, Uganda continues to implement a phased-approach of lifting the countrywide lockdown while considering the wearing of face-masks in all public settings mandatory for all (32). In light of this, we hypothesized that high knowledge levels about COVID-19 and face-mask use, positive attitudes and perceptions towards face-mask use as well as good face-mask use practices in Uganda could significantly contribute to breaking the chain of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in health-care settings and the community via reducing the infectiousness of the sub-clinical virus shedders while also offering some protection to the susceptible populations. Hence, we aimed to provide evidence on health-care and community-level perspectives on the use of face-masks in preventing COVID-19 acquisition and spread through assessing the knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and practices towards their use. This is because little remains known regarding use of face-masks in Uganda. We hoped that our findings would be used by decision makers to guide their recommendations with regards to the use of face-masks by the population including healthy, pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in health-care settings and the community to prevent health-care settings and community acquisition and spread of COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) towards COVID-19 and the use of face-masks among Ugandan high-risk groups. In this study, we analyzed knowledge on the right procedure of face-mask use, receipt of information on the use of face-masks, and face-mask ownership as well as their associated factors. These findings could be useful for public health policy-makers, health workers, and other stakeholders to improve the uptake of face-masks as a key intervention in the prevention of COVID-19 for example through health education among key populations.

In this study, majority of the participants reported having heard about COVID-19, an indication that they were knowledgeable about the disease. The majority of the participants held non-optimistic attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19. Indeed, many participants reported that they were fearful about the disease, and also agreed that contracting the virus was serious. In light of this, the practices of the participants were very cautious as nearly all reported having done something to protect themselves and their families from COVID-19. These participants reported having practiced hand washing with soap and water for the recommended 20 seconds and having worn face-masks. The participants however believed that the government’s response to COVID-19 had been adequate. This could be attributed to the actions the government had undertaken in the early stages of the pandemic that included: (i) suspension of all public gatherings, (ii) closure of all schools, (iii) suspension of public transport among others (38-40). These actions could have positively affected the perceptions and practices towards COVID-19.

Unlike the finding of a similar study (41), the finding in this study where majority of the participants had reported being knowledgeable about COVID-19 was expected. This is because this study was conducted during the time Uganda’s COVID-19 infections had entered stage three as had been declared by her Ministry of Health in a press release in early June 2020 (42). However, the finding could also be attributed to the efforts that had been pursued by the Ugandan government specifically her Ministry of Health to educate the population about the disease, across several fora such as local television and radio stations. This finding is also similar to that in studies elsewhere that have reported high levels of COVID-19 knowledge in the general population and health-care workers (43-46). Improved knowledge on infectious diseases has been shown to avert negative attitudes while promoting positive preventive practices (46). We also believe that the above finding could be due to the participants’ attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19. Indeed, majority of the participants reported that they feared COVID-19. Due to the threat of the pandemic and the overwhelming news reports on this public health emergency, these populations could have heard of COVID-19 from various channels of information. These sources of information include: local newspapers, television and radio stations, social media and other internet platforms notably: the official websites and social media accounts of the Uganda’s Ministry of Health and Makerere University, Uganda’s largest and oldest institution of higher learning (47,48).

Uganda has in the past experienced several viral diseases outbreaks such as Ebola during which it has learnt invaluable lessons on how best to deal with these diseases. Indeed, the majority of the population have developed belief in their government’s ability to respond to these diseases, as these responses have been refined overtime (20,49-51). In the case of this study, the belief that the Ugandan government’s response was adequate could be related to the: (1) manner in which the country handled previous viral diseases outbreaks, hence belief already instilled in the Ugandan population but also the unprecedented COVID-19 control measures such as the lockdown of the entire country, (2) willingness to heed to the call sent across by the Ugandan government for concerted efforts from across the country particularly the business community, religious and cultural institutions to: comply with the directives provided by the Ugandan Ministry of Health and cease conducting business, indefinitely suspend religious and cultural gatherings while encouraging their followers to observe all the guidelines provided to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 (52), could have also increased the confidence of the Ugandans, as it demonstrated the belief that the different stakeholders had in the government’s capability to handle the situation, and (3) high knowledge levels about COVID-19 among the target groups could also explain this phenomenon, as increase in knowledge could have been attributed mostly to the efforts of the Ugandan government. Our study established that participants held non-optimistic attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 as the majority reported that they were fearful about the disease, and they also agreed that contracting the virus was serious. In light of this, the practices of the participants were very cautious: almost all reported having done something to protect themselves and their families from COVID-19. The practices included having practiced hand washing with soap and water for the recommended 20 seconds, and having acquired and worn face-masks. These strict preventive measures could primarily be attributed their fear of COVID-19, but also, to the strict prevention and control measures that had been implemented by the Ugandan government such as banning of all public gatherings among others. Secondly, they could also be the result of the target populations’ high level of knowledge regarding the seriousness of contracting COVID-19.

Fortunately, the present study like other related studies (41,45,46,53,54), showed that despite the use of face-masks not being a norm in the Ugandan society and the shortage of supply of face-masks due to their high demand as reported elsewhere (43,55), majority of the participants owned and had used face-masks as a protective measure against COVID-19. The participants also reported that they had received information on the use of face-masks via various channels: local leaders and CHWs, local television and radio stations, as well as social media and other internet platforms, and believed that they knew the right procedures of how to use face-masks. This finding is consistent with those of other studies that have showed that: televisions, radios, social media and other internet platforms constitute the major sources of information about COVID-19 (45,46,56). In addition, the transition from television and radios to social media and other internet platforms continues at an unprecedented rate in Uganda. Indeed, the use of smart phones continues to increase across the country, internet connectivity is currently progressing from a luxury for the rich to a felt need for the middle class, and internet cafes are still flourishing throughout the capital city Kampala with lower prices. These developments in the country could explain the increasing use of social media and other internet platforms as sources of information on COVID-19 for the population (57). Also, over time local leaders and CHWs have continued to play a critical role in information dissemination particularly during disease outbreaks in Uganda (58). Similar to a recommendation of another study in the same setting (46), this finding underscores the need to frequently use such media to disseminate COVID-19 related information. In addition, this study underscores the need to utilize local leaders and CHWs in the dissemination of COVID-19 related information, in addition to the different media platforms.

In this study, knowledge about the right procedure of wearing face-masks was related to receipt of information towards the use of face-masks which was related to age, sex, education levels and site of work. The decreased likelihood of receiving information on the use of face-masks was related to the young (24-33 years of age), males, having no formal education, and working in food markets.

As suggested by the findings from previous studies regarding age and gender patterns of risk-taking behaviors (59-61), men and late adolescents (the young) are more likely to engage in risk-taking behaviors. In line with the previous findings, we found a less likelihood of the males and the young receiving information on face-masks use. Males were also less likely to perceive the use of face-masks as a protective measure against COVID-19, hence potentially dangerous practices towards COVID-19.

Our study showed a high level of COVID-19 awareness as well as a high level of knowledge about the right procedure of wearing face-masks among the participants. This finding signifies a positive predictor in curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic within high-risk groups in Uganda. Strictly speaking, our study findings can only be generalized to Ugandan populations of a relatively high socioeconomic status. Considering that educational attainment and occupation are often used as proxy measures of socioeconomic status (41), these findings excluded the underprivileged (i.e. those with no formal education working in the food markets). The likely diminished understanding of the English language and the reduced likelihood of owning either a television set, radio or mobile phone or even accessing the internet and online information resources in these particular populations underscores the need to: (1) pursue research on KAP towards COVID-19 in these populations in Uganda, (2) identify other platforms/means of disseminating knowledge with regards to COVID-19 and practices thereof. Efforts to utilize local leaders and CHWs as well as the dissemination of knowledge pertaining COVID-19 in various local languages could also be pursued.

Unlike the findings of related studies where ownership and use of face-masks was less common (43,46), majority of this study’s participants owned and used face-masks, and believed that the use of the face-masks would protect them from contracting COVID-19. However, this study’s findings are similar to those of other studies (45,62,63). Age and receipt of information on the use of face-masks were the factors that were associated with people’s attitudes and perceptions on whether face-masks were a good protective measure against COVID-19. Participants also reported that they would wear face-masks indefinitely incase the COVID-19 threat persisted, and suggested that with constant reminders (especially via banners and posters, television and radio reminders) and watching others in their settings/communities wearing them, they would continue wearing their face-masks. This finding is consistent with the perspective that face-masks are beyond simply pieces of fabric but rather symbols that serve as constant reminders, and that indicate the presence of a threat(s) (31). This finding suggests that face-masks could be leveraged as symbols that could gradually impact attitudes, perceptions and practices towards COVID-19 in these populations while offering protection against acquiring the virus.

Despite the low certainty evidence as alluded in a number of studies and perspectives (31,64), regarding the protection offered by face-masks in the prevention of COVID-19, our findings on ownership and the use of face-masks by the participants were expected and could be explained by their fear of COVID-19 and the perceived seriousness of contracting the virus. This explanation has also been expounded in the perspective (31), in which expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution was noted as their role in reducing the transmission of nervousness, over and above whatever role they could play in reducing COVID-19 transmission. The findings on the perceived role of face-masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19 underscore the need to pursue quality, cost-effective research including randomized trials in multiple settings to examine research gaps related to aerosol generating procedures and airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, as face-mask use appears to be an acceptable prevention measure to many.

Furthermore, in the absence of research affirming that face-masks do not offer protection against COVID-19. This study’s findings underscore the need for all countries to critically consider the opinions of available studies that have evaluated pre- and asymptomatic-transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and a growing compilation of observational evidence on the use of face-masks by the general public conducted in several countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. In so doing, these countries should adopt the current guidelines provided by WHO and CDC with regards to the use of face-masks in health-care and community settings to: (1) prevent the infected wearer transmitting the infection to others, (2) offer protection to the health wearer against infection, (3) abate circumstances where there could be high risk of exposure to SARS CoV-2 due to intensity of transmission and epidemiology in the population coupled with limited or no capacity to implement other containment measures for example contact tracing, testing and isolation, and care of suspected and confirmed cases; also depending on occupation: individuals working in close contact with the public, (4) offer protection in settings with high population density and settings where individuals are unable to keep a physical distance; particularly those where the risks are greater to ensure a comprehensive approach towards preventing the transmission of COVID-19 (22).

The finding where older participants believed that face-masks were not a good protective measure against COVID-19 may be attributed to their inadequate knowledge about COVID-19, specifically the use of the face-masks as a preventive measure against the disease. This is consistent with another study (65), that reported greater difficulties in accessing novel information, higher likelihood of encountering financial or resource barriers to implement preventive measures among old people, as well as poor neighborhoods and communities.

Unfortunately, some of the participants in this study reported that they could not wear face-masks indefinitely if the COVID-19 threat was to persist, as they found them an inconvenience. This finding could be explained by this study’s other findings in which the receipt of information on the use of face-masks was related to comfort of wearing the face-masks for as long as it was believed necessary; as those who had received the information on the use of face-masks were more likely to be comfortable wearing the face-masks for as long as it was believed necessary. Improved knowledge is critical in shaping people’s behaviour and practices particularly during disease outbreaks because knowledge is partly linked with panic emotion among most populations, which in turn influences their attitudes, perceptions and practices as has been reported in the case of COVID-19 (66). However, improved knowledge in the same populations may not be sufficient to cause behavioral change regarding the use face-masks for extended durations of time. This study’s findings therefore underscore the need to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice by utilizing more interactive and participatory training models developed in a participatory manner involving the different stakeholders for example through focus group discussions as well as field simulations.

In addition, efforts to train high risk populations on the use of face-masks should be encouraged as this would ensure increased ease of using the face-masks as a protective measure against COVID-19. Also, education on other COVID-19 control measures could be disseminated as best alternatives to the adult groups who may have difficulties accepting the use of face-masks as a protective measure against COVID-19.

Regarding the finding where the majority of the participants had re-used their face-masks: majority having had re-used them for up to a week and others for more than one month. Re-use was found associated with education status (having no formal education) and site of work (working in food markets) and this could be explained by: (1) the unavailability or shortage of the face-masks and (2) high costs of the available face-masks in Uganda (67,68). Previous studies have reported the prolonged use and re-use of medical face-masks despite the recommendation for their single use due to their unavailability or shortage especially during pandemics or extended outbreaks and other high demanding situations (69-71). However, the prolonged use or re-use of medical face-masks has also been documented as high-risk practices that could lead to self-contamination of the wearer and hence sources of infection (72).

The limited supply of face-masks and the enforcement of the mandatory wearing of face-masks in all public places by the Ugandan government led to an unprecedented increase in local production of non-medical face-masks. These masks are mostly made up of locally available materials, at both small and large scale as was reported via several local tabloids (73). The locally manufactured face-masks, were mostly single- or - double layered, and had been made out of mostly cotton fabric commonly known as “kitenge”, were cheaper and readily available to the masses. The availability of the cheap locally-made face-mask could explain the finding where the majority of the participants owned and used non-medical face-masks. However, similar to medical masks, the prolonged use or re-use of non-medical face-masks could be high-risk practices that could lead to self-contamination of the wearer and hence sources of infection (72).

This study’s findings underscore the need to sample and perform laboratory testing for both medical and non-medical face-masks commonly circulating on the Ugandan market to assess their safety and fitness-for-use, specific testing could include: microbial filtration efficiency, breathability, splash resistance (synthetic blood), distance dependent fit, microbial cleanliness, and biocompatibility while utilizing available standard operating procedures. This could not only help inform public-health policy makers with regards to the safety and fitness-for-use of the different face-masks circulating on the Ugandan market but could also inform local manufactures on ways to modify their processes so as to locally produce safe medical and non-medical face-masks able to offer protection, while maintaining or promoting health and also a continuous supply of the face-masks. It is worth mentioning that higher COVID-19 knowledge, ownership and use of face-masks and receipt of information on their use scores were found to be significantly associated with a lower likelihood of negative attitudes, perceptions and potentially dangerous practices towards COVID-19 in this study. These findings clearly indicate the importance of improving Ugandans’ COVID-19 knowledge through health education, which may also result in improvements in their attitudes, perceptions and practices towards COVID-19.

Our findings of the demographic factors associated with KAP towards COVID-19 and the use of face-masks are generally consistent with those of previous studies elsewhere on SARS and other viral infectious diseases (41,46,74,75). These findings further suggest that health education interventions would be more effective if they targeted certain demographic groups, particularly, men, the elderly and persons with no formal education.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that Ugandan high-risk groups, had good knowledge, optimistic attitudes and perceptions, and relatively appropriate practices towards COVID-19. In addition, good COVID-19 knowledge was associated with optimistic attitudes and appropriate practices towards COVID-19, suggesting that health education programs aimed at improving COVID-19 knowledge are helpful for encouraging optimistic attitudes and perceptions as well as maintaining safe practices especially if they targeted for certain demographic groups, particularly, men, the elderly and persons with no formal education. Furthermore, this study underscores the need to conduct laboratory testing to assess the safety and fitness-for-use for both medical and non-medical face-masks commonly circulating on the Ugandan market.

Funding

This work was supported by the Government of Uganda through Makerere University Research and Innovations Fund (RIF) under the RIF Special COVID-19 Research and Innovation Awards-2020 (Grant #: MAK/DVCFA/151/20). The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Government of Uganda and Makerere University Research and Innovations Fund.