Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Stability of Extemporaneously Prepared Preservative-Free Methylphenidate 5 mg/mL Intravenous Solution

View ORCID ProfileMegan E. Barra, View ORCID ProfileBrian L. Edlow, James T. Lund, Katherine Sencion, John Vetrano, Cherylann Reilly-Tremblay, Edlyn R. Zhang, Yelena Bodien, Emery N. Brown, Ken Solt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.29.20184457
Megan E. Barra
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
2Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Megan E. Barra
  • For correspondence: mbarra{at}mgh.harvard.edu
Brian L. Edlow
2Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
3Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brian L. Edlow
James T. Lund
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PharmD, MS, BCSCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Sencion
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PharmD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Vetrano
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cherylann Reilly-Tremblay
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edlyn R. Zhang
6Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yelena Bodien
2Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
3Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emery N. Brown
5Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Medical Engineering and Sciences, the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, and the Institute for Data Systems and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA
6Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Solt
6Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose To advance the implementation of consciousness-promoting therapies in patients with acute disorders of consciousness, the availability of potential therapeutic agents in formulations suitable for administration in hospitalized patients in the presence of complex comorbid conditions is paramount. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term stability of extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution.

Methods A methylphenidate 5 mg/mL solution was prepared under proper aseptic techniques with Methylphenidate HCl USP powder mixed in sterile water for solution. Methylphenidate HCl 5 mg/ml solution was sterilized by filtration technique under USP <797> compliant conditions. Samples were stored refrigerated (2 - 8°C) and analyzed at approximately day 1, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365. At each time point, chemical and physical stability was evaluated by visual inspection, pH measurement, membrane filtration procedure, turbidometric or photometric technique, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.

Results Over the 1-year study period, the sample retained 96.76 – 102.04% of initial methylphenidate concentration. There was no significant change in the visual appearance, pH level or particulate matter during the study period. The sample maintained bacterial and fungi sterility, and endotoxin levels were undetectable throughout the 1-year stability period.

Conclusions Extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution was physically and chemically stable for up to 365 days when stored in amber glass vials at refrigerated temperatures (2 - 8°C).

Introduction

Methylphenidate hydrochloride (HCl) is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance by the United States (U.S.) Drug Enforcement Administration and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.1,2 Methylphenidate has been used off-label for the management of major depressive disorder, narcolepsy, severe fatigue in the cancer or palliative care setting and is increasingly utilized as a neurostimulant to promote recovery after traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest, and stroke in the acute and chronic recovery periods.3–8 It is actively being explored as a therapeutic agent to promote emergence of consciousness after generalized anesthesia or in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.9–11 With the Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign launch in 2019 to strategically advance the implementation of consciousness-promoting therapies in patients with disorders of consciousness, the availability of potential therapeutic agents in formulations suitable for administration in hospitalized patients in the presence of complex comorbid conditions is paramount.12

Methylphenidate is currently available in the U.S. as immediate release, sustained release, and extended-release oral suspension, chewable, and disintegrating tablets and/or capsules, transdermal patch, and bulk powder.13 Methylphenidate HCl is supplied as a racemic mixture dl-threo-methylphenidate subject to enantioselective first-pass metabolism.2 Intravenous methylphenidate may be advantageous over enteral administration due to its more predictable absorption profile.13–15 Additionally, intravenous methylphenidate may be administered to hospitalized patients who are contraindicated for enteral administration due to post-operative status, gastrointestinal dysfunction during hospitalization, or for acute treatment to promote recovery of consciousness in the research setting.10,11 In the absence of stability and sterility data, the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) beyond-use date of this non-sterile to sterile compounded solution is limited to 72-hours refrigerated or 24-hours room temperature.16

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution.

Materials and Methods

Solution Preparation

Compounded solution was prepared by the Department of Pharmacy at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. An intravenous stock solution of methylphenidate 5 mg/mL was prepared in a glass beaker by dissolving 1950 mg methylphenidate hydrochloride USP powder (Letco Medical) in sterile water for injection to a final volume of 390 mL. Mixed solution pH was adjusted to range pH 3-4 using hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. Under a laminar flow hood under USP <797> aseptic conditions, non-sterile methylphenidate 5 mg/mL 390 mL solution was filtered into an empty polyvinyl chloride plastic container using a 0.22 micron filter (Sterivex-GP pressure filter unit) to sterilize the solution. A total filtered solution volume of 15.2 mL was packaged into each 30 mL amber glass vial. Amber glass vials were sealed using tamper evident seals and labeled accordingly. Vials were stored under refrigerated conditions (2-8°C) and transported to a third-party lab for subsequent testing. Forty-six vials were transported for validation testing followed by 25 vials for stability testing approximately 1 month later. Refrigerated samples were stored in a dark refrigerator and exposed to light only during sampling. These samples were allowed to warm at room temperature without application of external heat sources.

Physical and chemical stability of the methylphenidate 5 mg/mL 15 mL solution was evaluated at approximately 1, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days. Physical and chemical stability was performed by DynaLabs LLC (St. Louis, Missouri). Chemical stability was evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as outlined in USP <621>. Microbial growth for bacteria and fungi was evaluated using membrane filtration procedures pursuant to USP <71>. Particulate matter was examined using a light obscuration particle count test in accordance with USP <788>. Visual inspection for clarity and color as specified in USP <797> was additionally examined at these time-points.

Chromatographic Apparatus and Conditions

Chromatographic studies were performed using a Phenomenex Gemini C18 HPLC column. The mobile phase was a 65/35 ratio of 2.7 g/L solution of potassium phosphate monobasic in water buffer and methanol. The flow rate was 1.8 mL/min for 0.5 min and 10 min for Step 0 and Step 1, respectively.

Validation of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride HPLC Method

Calibration curves were developed using linear regression of the calculated areas versus theoretical concentration (µg/mL). Acceptance criterion was set at r2 > 0.999. Accuracy was determined using a standard stock solution of 10 mg Methylphenidate Hydrochloride USP standard powder diluted with potassium phosphate monobasic in water 2.7 g/L solution (Fisher Scientific) to a final concentration of 500 µg/mL. Samples were further diluted according to a dilution schedule to a concentration 15 µg/mL (n=3), 25 µg/mL (n=3), or 35 µg/mL (n=3). Acceptance criterion for accuracy of average % recovery was set at > 97.5% and < 102.5%. Precision was determined using the same standard stock solution formula as the accuracy methods. Samples were diluted according to a dilution schedule to 25 µg/mL (n=9). Percent relative standard deviation (RSD) for the retention time and areas was calculated and acceptance criteria was set at < 2% RSD. Precision analysis was repeated on a different day and different instrument to determine intermediate precision (ruggedness).

Forced Degradation Study

A forced degradation study was performed to ensure the HPLC method was indicative of stability and capable of separation of degradation products from parent drugs. Forced degradation stock solution was compounded using 4.5 mg Methylphenidate HCl diluted with potassium phosphate monobasic (Fisher Scientific) in water 2.7 g/L solution to a final concentration of methylphenidate 90 µg/mL. Triplicate samples were prepared in 2-dram amber vials except for light samples, which were prepared in clear 2-dram vials, and diluted to 30 µg/mL. Samples underwent either acid hydrolysis, base hydrolysis, or oxidization using 1 mL of 0.1M hydrochloric acid solution (Fisher Scientific), sodium hydroxide (Fisher Scientific), or 3.5% H2O2 (Honeywell HPLC grade), respectively. Light samples were placed 8 cm apart from a 365 nm UV lamp light and left static for 3 hours, after which 1-mL of water was added to the sample and placed into amber liquid chromatography (LC) vials. Heat samples were placed in a beaker filled with deionized water heated to 70 °C on top of a heated stir plate for 3-hours, after which vials were removed and allowed to cool to room temperature, mixed with 1 mL of water (Honeywell HPLC grade) and placed into amber LC vials. Liquid chromatography sequencing was performed on all standard forced degradation samples after an initial blank sample was run. The area under three standard injections was averaged to one value. For all other samples, the percentage recovery was determined by dividing the areas of the samples by the average area of the standard and multiplying by 100. Purity values were analyzed according to peak apex and similarity algorithm for 5-distinct portions. Values > 900 were considered pure while values < 900 were considered pure only if value is within 10% of the standard values.

Data Analysis

The stability of methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution was determined. Stability was defined as at least 90% retention of the initial Methylphenidate HCl concentration at each time-point evaluated.

Results and Discussion

At least 95% of the initial concentration of methylphenidate was retained throughout the 1-year study period (Table 1). No detectable changes upon visual inspection in color or clarity were observed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Stability of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride 5 mg/mL Intravenous Solution Stored at 2 - 8°C.

Furthermore, no microbial growth was detected at any point during the 1-year study period and endotoxin were non-detectable < 0.05 EU/mL. No appreciable change in pH (range 3.43-3.67) over the 1-year study period was observed.

The number of particles > 10 µm per container were 102 parts/container on day 4, 47 parts/container (day 33), 70 parts/container (day 68), 52 parts/container (day 95), 28 parts/container (day 182), and 155 parts/container (day 375). The number of particles > 25 µm per container were 0 parts/container on day 4, 0 parts/container (day 33), 4 parts/container (day 68), 2 parts/container (day 95), 2 parts/container (day 182), and 6 parts/container (day 375).

Conclusions

Extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution was stable for up to 365 days when stored refrigerated in 30-mL amber glass bottles.

Data Availability

The data referred to in this manuscript is available upon request.

Financial Disclosures

The study was funded by NIH Director’s Office (DP2HD101400). The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Controlled substance schedules. U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division. Accessed June 19, 2020. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/#:~:text=Schedule%20II%2FIIN%20Controlled%20Substances%20(2%2F2N)&text=Other%20Schedule%20II%20narcotics%20include,and%20methylphenidate%20(Ritalin%C2%AE).
  2. 2.↵
    Kimko HC, Cross JT, Abernethy DR. Pharmacokinetics and clinical effectiveness of methylphenidate. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37(6):457-470. doi:10.2165/00003088-199937060-00002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J, Toussaint L, Blackwell B. Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1047-1050. doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90169-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Barra ME, Izzy S, Sarro-Schwartz A, Hirschberg RE, Mazwi N, Edlow BL. Stimulant Therapy in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: Prescribing Patterns and Adverse Event Rates at 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers. J Intensive Care Med. Published online April 9, 2019:885066619841603. doi:10.1177/0885066619841603
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.
    Huang C-H, Huang C-C, Sun C-K, Lin G-H, Hou W-H. Methylphenidate on Cognitive Improvement in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(3):272-281. doi:10.2174/1570159x13666150514233033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.
    Johansson B, Wentzel A-P, Andréll P, Rönnbäck L, Mannheimer C. Long-term treatment with methylphenidate for fatigue after traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(1):100-107. doi:10.1111/ane.12587
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.
    McDonald BC, Flashman LA, Arciniegas DB, et al. Methylphenidate and Memory and Attention Adaptation Training for Persistent Cognitive Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;42(9):1766-1775. doi:10.1038/npp.2016.261
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Reynolds JC, Rittenberger JC, Callaway CW. Methylphenidate and amantadine to stimulate reawakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84(6):818-824. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Solt K, Cotten JF, Cimenser A, Wong KFK, Chemali JJ, Brown EN. Methylphenidate actively induces emergence from general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(4):791-803. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822e92e5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Chemali JJ, Van Dort CJ, Brown EN, Solt K. Active emergence from propofol general anesthesia is induced by methylphenidate. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(5):998-1005. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182518bfc
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Edlow BL, Barra ME, Zhou DW, et al. Personalized Connectome Mapping to Guide Targeted Therapy and Promote Recovery of Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit. Neurocrit Care. Published online August 13, 2020. doi:10.1007/s12028-020-01062-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    Provencio JJ, Hemphill JC, Claassen J, et al. The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33(1):1-12. doi:10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Methylphenidate. In: Lexi-Drugs Online [Database on the Internet]. Hudson (OH): Lexicomp, Inc.; 2020. Available from: Http://Online.Lexi.Com.
  14. 14.
    Janowsky DS, Leichner P, Clopton P, Judd LL, Parker D, Huey L. Comparison of oral and intravenous methylphenidate. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978;59(1):75-78. doi:10.1007/BF00428034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Smith BS, Yogaratnam D, Levasseur-Franklin KE, Forni A, Fong J. Introduction to drug pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient. Chest. 2012;141(5):1327-1336. doi:10.1378/chest.11-1396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    American Society of Health System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on compounding sterile preparations. Am J Health-Syst Pharm AJHP Off J Am Soc Health-Syst Pharm. 2014;71(2):145-166. doi:10.2146/sp140001
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stability of Extemporaneously Prepared Preservative-Free Methylphenidate 5 mg/mL Intravenous Solution
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Stability of Extemporaneously Prepared Preservative-Free Methylphenidate 5 mg/mL Intravenous Solution
Megan E. Barra, Brian L. Edlow, James T. Lund, Katherine Sencion, John Vetrano, Cherylann Reilly-Tremblay, Edlyn R. Zhang, Yelena Bodien, Emery N. Brown, Ken Solt
medRxiv 2020.08.29.20184457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.29.20184457
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Stability of Extemporaneously Prepared Preservative-Free Methylphenidate 5 mg/mL Intravenous Solution
Megan E. Barra, Brian L. Edlow, James T. Lund, Katherine Sencion, John Vetrano, Cherylann Reilly-Tremblay, Edlyn R. Zhang, Yelena Bodien, Emery N. Brown, Ken Solt
medRxiv 2020.08.29.20184457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.29.20184457

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)