Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Take-Home Dosing Experiences among Persons Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment During COVID-19

View ORCID ProfileMary C. Figgatt, Zach Salazar, Elizabeth Day, Louise Vincent, View ORCID ProfileNabarun Dasgupta
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185249
Mary C. Figgatt
1Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary C. Figgatt
  • For correspondence: mfiggatt{at}unc.edu
Zach Salazar
3North Carolina Survivors Union
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Day
3North Carolina Survivors Union
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Vincent
3North Carolina Survivors Union
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nabarun Dasgupta
1Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nabarun Dasgupta
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose Methadone maintenance treatment is a life-saving treatment for people with opioid use disorders (OUD). The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) introduces many concerns surrounding access to opioid treatment. In March 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) issued guidance allowing the expansion of take-home methadone doses. We sought to describe changes to treatment experiences from the perspective of persons receiving methadone at outpatient treatment facilities for OUD.

Methods We conducted an in-person survey among 104 persons receiving methadone from three clinics in central North Carolina in June and July 2020. Surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, methadone treatment history, and experiences with take-home methadone doses in the context of COVID-19 (i.e., before and since March 2020).

Results Before COVID-19, the clinic-level percent of participants receiving any amount of days’ supply of take-home doses at each clinic ranged from 56% to 82%, while it ranged from 78% to 100% since COVID-19. The clinic-level percent of participants receiving a take-homes days’ supply of a week or longer (i.e., ≥6 days) since COVID-19 ranged from 11% to 56%. Among 87 participants who received take-homes since COVID-19, only four reported selling their take-home doses.

Conclusions Our study found variation in experiences of take-home dosing by clinic and little diversion of take-home doses. While SAMSHA guidance should allow expanded access to take-home doses, adoption of these guidelines may vary at the clinic level. The adoption of these policies should be explored further, particularly in the context of benefits to patients seeking OUD treatment.

Highlights

  • Methadone take-home dosing of survey participants varied by clinic.

  • Diversion of take-home doses was rare.

  • Implementation of COVID-19 opioid treatment guidelines should be examined further.

Competing Interest Statement

Nabarun Dasgupta's participation in this research was conducted solely as part of academic duties as a member of the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. ND is a part-time methods consultant to the RADARS System, which was not involved in nor had knowledge of this manuscript. The RADARS System is supported by subscriptions from pharmaceutical manufacturers, governmental and non-governmental agencies for data, research and reporting services. RADARS System is the property of Denver Health and Hospital Authority, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado (United States of America). Subscribers do not participate in data collection nor do they have access to raw data; Denver Health retains exclusive ownership of all data, databases and systems. Employees are prohibited from personal financial relationships with any biopharmaceutical company.

Funding Statement

This project was supported in part through a US Food and Drug Administration contract to the University of North Carolina (HHSF223201810183C).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not currently available for external use. However, if there is interest in obtaining additional information, please contact one of the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 05, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Take-Home Dosing Experiences among Persons Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment During COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Take-Home Dosing Experiences among Persons Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment During COVID-19
Mary C. Figgatt, Zach Salazar, Elizabeth Day, Louise Vincent, Nabarun Dasgupta
medRxiv 2020.08.31.20185249; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185249
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Take-Home Dosing Experiences among Persons Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment During COVID-19
Mary C. Figgatt, Zach Salazar, Elizabeth Day, Louise Vincent, Nabarun Dasgupta
medRxiv 2020.08.31.20185249; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.31.20185249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Addiction Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)