SYNOPSIS
Background Distinguishing pneumonia from acute bronchitis has an important bearing on treatment decisions. The best validated diagnostic decision rule was derived from the GRACE-09 study. The 3Cs study provides oxygen saturations in addition to clinical signs and symptoms. Oxygen saturation is a predictor in hospital settings and may be beneficial in primary care.
Objectives This project evaluates whether the data from GRACE-09 and 3Cs studies can be mapped onto each other and be combined dataset to refine the diagnostic accuracy of the GRACE-09 clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of pneumonia.
Patients and Methods GRACE-09 included 3106 patients with acute cough in a multicentre European study. 3Cs is a UK based study of 28883 patients with acute cough.
Binary logistic regression was used in the 3Cs dataset to determine which variables significantly predicted low oxygen saturation (<95%). Statistically significant predictors were determined using area under curve (AUC). This equation was used to model the probability of low oxygen saturation in the GRACE-09 dataset and subsequently included in the GRACE-09 model to determine whether low oxygen saturation is a comparable predictor to breathlessness in predicting pneumonia.
Results For 3Cs, using all seven variables achieved an AUC for low oxygen saturation of 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-0.74). Substituting low oxygen saturation into GRACE-09 model gives AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.82) compared to original GRACE-09 using breathlessness and gives AUC 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.82).
Conclusions Low oxygen saturation and breathlessness are similarly predictive and could be used interchangeably in a modified GRACE-09 prediction model.
KEY MESSAGES Can pulse oximetry replace subjective breathlessness assessment in the GRACE-09 prediction rule? Pulse oximetry gives an objective measurement that can be used to assist the diagnosis of pneumonia in primary care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This was an unfunded Medical Student project
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
this was an unfunded medical student project with ethics approval from the university of Southampton
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
all data referred to in the manuscript is available
