Abstract
Background Obstetric Early Warning Systems (EWS) use combined clinical observations to predict increased risk of deterioration and alert health workers to institute actions likely to improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to explore the experience of health workers/managers who implemented a low resource setting-specific statistically derived and validated EWS and to assess its effectiveness in improving health outcomes.
Methods This mixed-method study included 2400 women admitted to inpatient wards between 1 August 2018 and 31 March 2019 at three tertiary Nigerian hospitals (1 intervention and 2 control) with pregnancy and childbirth-related complications. The quality of patient monitoring and prevalence of outcomes were assessed through retrospective review of case notes before and 4 months after EWS was introduced. Outcomes were maternal death, direct obstetric complications, length of hospital stay, speed of clinical review, caesarean section(CS) and instrumental birth rates. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were undertaken to explore the views of healthcare workers on EWS’ acceptability and usability.
Results EWS was correctly used in 51% (n=307) of cases. Of these, 58.6% (180) were predicted to have increased risk of deterioration, and 38.9% (n=70) were reviewed within 1 hour. There was a significant improvement in the frequency of vital signs recording in the intervention site: observed/expected frequency improved to 0.91 from 0.57, p<0.005, but not in the control sites. CS rate dropped from 39.9% to 31.5% (chi-square p=0.002). No statistically significant effect was observed in the other outcomes.
Health workers reported positive experience using EWS, with the feeling that it helped cope with work demands while making it easier to detect and manage deteriorating patients. Nurses and doctors reported that the EWS was easy to use, evaluate at a glance, and that scores consistently correlated with the clinical picture of patients. Identified challenges to use included rotation of clinical staff, low staffing numbers and monitoring equipment.
Conclusion The implementation of EWS improved the quality of patient monitoring, but a larger study will be required to explore the effect on critical care admission and health outcomes. With modifications to suit the setting, coupled with regular training, the EWS is a feasible and acceptable tool to cope with the unique demands faced in low-resource settings.
Summary box
What is already known?
What is already known?
An obstetric EWS algorithm with seven parameters (RR, temperature, systolic BP, pulse rate, consciousness level, urinary output and mode of birth), was developed and internally validated using data from low resource settings.
What are the new findings?
What are the new findings?
There was a significant improvement in the frequency of vital signs recording following implementation of the algorithm in the intervention site: observed/expected frequency improved to 0.91 from 0.57, p<0.005, but not in the control sites.
CS rate dropped from 39.9% to 31.5% (chi-square p=0.002) in the intervention arm, though difficult to attribute to reduction in medically unnecessary CS.
The obstetric EWS algorithm was easy to use, easy to evaluate at a glance, capable of guiding referral and accurate, with scores always correlating with the clinical picture of patients.
What do the new findings imply?
What do the new findings imply?
EWS is feasible to implement and potentially acceptable tool to cope with the unique demands faced by obstetric practice in low-resource settings
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568048 ISRCTN15568048. Registration date; 9/09/2020
Clinical Protocols
http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15568048
Funding Statement
This study is part of the doctorate thesis of the first author. The research is fully funded by the Nigerian Petroleum Trust Development Fund (ID 16PhD152). We acknowledge additional funding by the Johnson and Johnsons grant (Charity Number 222655) for CEmOC training in Kwara State, Nigeria.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approvals were received from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM- Research Protocol 18-074) and the three study sites (NHA/OG/GC/0171, UITH/CAT/189/19/167, ATBUTH/ ADM /42 / VOL1). Since routinely collected patient information was used for the research, no individual-level consent was deemed necessary as was performed in similar studies (Merriel et al., 2017; Sheikh et al., 2017; Singh, A., et al., 2016)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used can be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author
