ABSTRACT
Background Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed to predict individual cancer risk and their potential clinical utility is receiving a great deal of attention. However, the degree to which the predictive utility of individual cancer-specific PRS may be augmented or refined by the incorporation of other cancer PRS, non-cancer disease PRS, or the protective effects of health and longevity-associated variants, is largely unexplored.
Methods We constructed PRS for different cancers from public domain data as well as genetic scores for longevity (‘Polygenic Longevity Scores’ or ‘PLS’) for individuals in the UK Biobank. We then explored the relationships of these multiple PRS and PLS among those with and without various cancers.
Results We found statistically significant associations between some PLS and individual cancers, even after accounting for cancer-specific PRS. None of the PLS in their current form had an effect pronounced enough to motivate clinical cancer risk stratification based on its combined use with cancer PRS. A few variants at loci used in the PLS had known associations with Alzheimer’s disease and other diseases.
Conclusion Underlying heterogeneity behind cancer susceptibility in the population at large is not captured by PRS derived from analytical models that only consider marginal associations of individual variants with cancer diagnoses. Our results have implications for the derivation and calculation of PRS and their use in clinical and biomedical research settings.
Impact Extensions of analyses like ours could result in a more refined understanding of cancer biology and how to construct PRS for cancer.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Aspects of this work were funded in part by NIH grants UH2 AG064706, U19 AG023122, U24 AG051129, U24 AG051129-04S1; NSF grant (FAIN number) 2031819; Dell, Inc.; and the Ivy and Ottesen Foundations.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UK Biobank
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data is publicly available from the UK Biobank and/or the authors.
