Abstract
Purpose As the treatment efficacy of systemic therapy for patients with advanced-stage HCC is insufficient, locoregional therapies are performed in the clinical practice. We investigated the efficacy and safety of two most potent therapies, surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with HCC involving the IVC and/or right atrium (RA) through comparative meta-analysis.
Method A systematic search of Pubmed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was performed for entries up to July 2020. The primary endpoints were 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates, while secondary endpoints were response rate, local control rate, and grade ≥3 toxicities.
Results Eighteen studies with 22 cohorts were included, encompassing 755 patients. The pooled median OS and 1-and 2-year OS rates were 14.2 months, 55.6%, and 27.4%, respectively. The pooled median OS in the surgery and EBRT arms were 15.3 and 11.7 months, respectively. The pooled 1-year OS rate of the surgery arm was significantly higher than that of the EBRT arm (62.4%, 95% CI: 53.8–70.3 vs. 48.8%, 95% CI: 40.9–56.8; p=0.023). However, the 2-year OS rates were comparable (26.9%, 95% CI: 20.7–34.2 vs. 27.5%, 95% CI: 19.7–37.1; p=0.913). The pooled response and local control rates in the EBRT arm were 74.3% and 87.2%, respectively. In the surgical arm, the perioperative mortality and grade ≥3 complication rates were 0–7.6% and 3.9–67%, respectively. Grade ≥3 complications and radiation-induced liver disease were rarely observed in the EBRT arm.
Conclusions Both surgery and EBRT are effective treatment options for patients with HCC involving IVC/RA invasion. Outcomes and safety should be further evaluated in well-controlled clinical trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Research Fund of Korea (NRF-2019M2D2A1A01031560). The research grant supported only methodological aspects including statistical analysis and linguistic correction, and did not influence major contents including the results and conclusions.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
this study is meta-analysis and not indicated for IRB approval
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
all data analyzed in this study is published in literature
Abbreviations
- CI
- confidence interval
- CPC
- Child-Pugh class
- EBRT
- external beam radiotherapy
- IVC
- inferior vena cava
- HCC
- hepatocellular carcinoma
- OS
- overall survival
- PVT
- portal vein thrombosis
- RA
- right atrium
- TACE
- transarterial chemoembolization
