Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Time-series clustering for home dwell time during COVID-19: what can we learn from it?

View ORCID ProfileXiao Huang, View ORCID ProfileZhenlong Li, View ORCID ProfileJunyu Lu, Sicheng Wang, Hanxue Wei, Baixu Chen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.27.20202671
Xiao Huang
1Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xiao Huang
  • For correspondence: xh010{at}uark.edu
Zhenlong Li
2Department of Geography, University of South Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zhenlong Li
Junyu Lu
3School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Junyu Lu
Sicheng Wang
2Department of Geography, University of South Carolina
4Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanxue Wei
5Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baixu Chen
6Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the potential driving factors that lead to the disparity in the time-series of home dwell time, aiming to provide fundamental knowledge that benefits policy-making for better mitigation strategies of future pandemics. Taking Metro Atlanta as a study case, we perform a trend-driven analysis by conducting Kmeans time-series clustering using fine-grained home dwell time records from SafeGraph, and further assess the statistical significance of sixteen demographic/socioeconomic variables from five major categories. We find that demographic/socioeconomic variables can explain the disparity in home dwell time in response to the stay-at-home order, which potentially leads to disparate exposures to the risk from the COVID-19. The results further suggest that socially disadvantaged groups are less likely to follow the order to stay at home, pointing out the extensive gaps in the effectiveness of social distancing measures exist between socially disadvantaged groups and others. Our study reveals that the long-standing inequity issue in the U.S. stands in the way of the effective implementation of social distancing measures. Policymakers need to carefully evaluate the inevitable trade-off among different groups, making sure the outcomes of their policies reflect interests of the socially disadvantaged groups.

Highlights

  • We perform a trend-driven analysis by conducting Kmeans time-series clustering using fine- grained home dwell time records from SafeGraph.

  • We find that demographic/socioeconomic variables can explain the disparity in home dwell time in response to the stay-at-home order.

  • The results suggest that socially disadvantaged groups are less likely to follow the order to stay at home, potentially leading to more exposures to the COVID-19.

  • Policymakers need to make sure the outcomes of their policies reflect the interests of the disadvantaged groups.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Vice Chancellor for Research & Innovation of the University of Arkansas. The funders and data providers had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • zhenlong{at}sc.edu, Junyu.Lu{at}asu.edu, sicheng.wang{at}rutgers.edu, hw652{at}cornell.edu, chenbaix{at}umich.edu

Data Availability

The original data is derived from SafeGraph. The preprocessed data can be obtained upon request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 30, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time-series clustering for home dwell time during COVID-19: what can we learn from it?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Time-series clustering for home dwell time during COVID-19: what can we learn from it?
Xiao Huang, Zhenlong Li, Junyu Lu, Sicheng Wang, Hanxue Wei, Baixu Chen
medRxiv 2020.09.27.20202671; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.27.20202671
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Time-series clustering for home dwell time during COVID-19: what can we learn from it?
Xiao Huang, Zhenlong Li, Junyu Lu, Sicheng Wang, Hanxue Wei, Baixu Chen
medRxiv 2020.09.27.20202671; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.27.20202671

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)