Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study

Laura Liu, Zahra Goodarzi, Aaron Jones, Ron Posno, Sharon Straus, Jennifer Watt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.01.20205302
Laura Liu
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King’s College Cir, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8
HBSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zahra Goodarzi
2Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre – North Tower, 9th floor, 1403-29th St NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
3Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron Jones
4Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ron Posno
5Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital-Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Ed.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon Straus
5Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital-Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
6Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 6 Queen’s Park Cres W, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H2
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Watt
5Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital-Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
6Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 6 Queen’s Park Cres W, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H2
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jennifer.watt{at}utoronto.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care (i.e. telephone or videoconference) has played a critical role. However, concerns were raised regarding equitable access for older adults, in particular, given potential advantages of videoconference-as opposed to telephone-based assessment. Our objective was to describe patient-specific factors associated with different modes of virtual healthcare.

Methods We reviewed medical records of all patients assessed virtually in the geriatric medicine clinic at St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada, between March 17 and July 13, 2020. We derived adjusted odds ratios (OR), risk differences (RD), and marginal and predicted probabilities, with 95% confidence intervals, from a multivariable logistic regression model, which tested the association between having a videoconference assessment (vs. a telephone assessment) and patient age, sex, ability to use a computer, education, frailty (measured on the Clinical Frailty Scale), history of cognitive impairment, and immigration history; language of assessment, and caregiver involvement in assessment.

Results Our study included 330 patients (227 telephone and 103 videoconference assessments). Frailty (adjusted OR 0.62, 0.45 to 0.85; adjusted RD -0.08, -0.09 to -0.06) and absence of a caregiver (adjusted OR 0.12, 0.06 to 0.24; adjusted RD -0.35, -0.43 to -0.26) were associated with lower odds of videoconference assessment. For example, an 80-year-old woman with mild frailty who immigrated to Canada, speaks English, attained a post-secondary education, does not have cognitive impairment, and uses a computer had a 60% (39% to 80%) predicted probability of videoconference assessment if a caregiver was present compared to 15% (3% to 26%) without a caregiver. Only 32 of 98 (32.7%) patients who could independently use a computer participated in videoconference assessments.

Conclusion Given the recent expansion of virtual care, we must urgently implement and evaluate strategies that optimise equitable access to videoconference-based virtual care for older adults.

  • virtual care
  • frailty
  • caregiver
  • aged

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was not funded.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

We obtained ethics approval for this study from the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • laur.liu{at}mail.utoronto.ca

  • zahra.goodarzi{at}albertahealthservices.ca

  • jonesa13{at}mcmaster.ca

  • rnsposno{at}gmail.com

  • sharon.straus{at}utoronto.ca

  • jennifer.watt{at}utoronto.ca

Data Availability

Interested researchers should contact the corresponding author for further information.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 04, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study
Laura Liu, Zahra Goodarzi, Aaron Jones, Ron Posno, Sharon Straus, Jennifer Watt
medRxiv 2020.10.01.20205302; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.01.20205302
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study
Laura Liu, Zahra Goodarzi, Aaron Jones, Ron Posno, Sharon Straus, Jennifer Watt
medRxiv 2020.10.01.20205302; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.01.20205302

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Geriatric Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)