Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection resulting in the clinical syndrome COVID-19 is associated with an exaggerated immune response and monocyte infiltrates in the lungs and other peripheral tissues. It is now increasingly recognised that chronic morbidity persists in some patients. We recently demonstrated profound alterations of monocytes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. It is currently unclear whether these abnormalities resolve or progress following patient discharge. We show here that blood monocytes in convalescent patients at their 12 week follow up, have a greater propensity to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-6, which was consistently higher in patients with resolution of lung injury as indicated by a normal chest X-ray and no shortness of breath (a key symptom of lung injury). Furthermore, monocytes from convalescent patients also displayed enhanced levels of molecules involved in leucocyte migration, including chemokine receptor CXCR6, adhesion molecule CD31/PECAM and integrins VLA-4 and LFA-1. Expression of migration molecules on monocytes was also consistently higher in convalescent patients with a normal chest X-ray. These data suggest persistent changes in innate immune function following recovery from COVID-19 and indicate that immune modulating therapies targeting monocytes and leucocyte migration may be useful in recovering COVID-19 patients with persistent symptoms.
Competing Interest Statement
GL is Co-founder and Scientific Advisory Board Member of Gritstone Oncology Inc., which is a public company that develops therapeutic vaccines (primarily for the treatment of cancer). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by The Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research who provided a Rapid Response Award for costs associated with the laboratory analysis of the immune response in COVID-19 patients to JRG, The Wellcome Trust (TH, 202865/Z/16/Z; 106898/A/15/Z which helped support some CIRCO members), The Wellcome Trust/Royal Society (ERM, 206206/Z/17/Z), the Lister Institute (JEK) and BBSRC (JEK BB/M025977/1, TNS BB/S01103X/1), the Medical Research Council (LP MR/R00191X/1) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (AGM). The Oxford, Leicester and Manchester NIHR BRC provided support for study design and sample collection.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Peripheral blood samples were collected at Manchester University Foundation Trust (MFT), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (SRFT) and Pennine Acute NHS Trust (PAT) under the framework of the Manchester Allergy, Respiratory and Thoracic Surgery (ManARTS) Biobank (study no M2020-88) for MFT or the Northern Care Alliance Research Collection (NCARC) tissue biobank (study no. NCA-009) for SRFT and PAT. Ethical approval was given by North West Haydock Research Ethics Committee for ManARTS (REC ref: 20/NW/0302) and Wales Research Ethics Committee 4 for NCARC (REC ref: 18/WA/0368).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Materials.
