Trends in suicide rates during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in a major German city

Introduction

It remains unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic is having an impact on suicide rates. Some predict that suicide rates will rise, since actions to contain COVID-19, such as social distancing, economic lockdown, or the temporary restructuring of the health system, could cause risk factors for suicide to increase ^1–5. Indeed, analyses of previous economic crises have shown that an increase in unemployment was associated with an increase in suicide rates ^6–10; and according to leading theories of suicide prevention, the loss of social inclusion is a major risk factor for suicide ¹¹.

In Germany, a significant restriction of the free movement of persons was agreed upon in March 2020, with the strongest restrictions coming into force in April and May. German borders were virtually closed for travel from 16 March onwards ^12–14. On 22 March 2020, the German Federal Government and the Länder agreed on a comprehensive restriction of social contacts, which required people to reduce contacts with others (except for members of one ‘s own household) to an absolute minimum ¹⁵. In the Free State of Saxony, further restrictions on going out, and a ban on visiting care homes, were adopted on 1 April 2020 ¹⁶. While the restrictions on going out were eased on 4 May, the restrictions on visiting care homes remained ¹⁷. Following a meeting by the EU interior ministers on 15 June, extensive freedom of movement within the EU ‘s Schengen Area was gradually restored, but differentiated travel warnings and quarantine regulations following travel remained in place for parts of it. The German Federal Foreign Office also maintained the existing travel warnings for 160 countries until 31 August 2020 ¹⁸.

Elderly people, particularly those with severe or multiple underlying health conditions, are threatened by high fatality rates of COVID-19 ¹⁹, and are therefore particularly affected by the pandemic. Social distancing was practised more consistently by this age group, and older people are more often dependent on help from third parties. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are in turn central risk factors for suicide, according to the interpersonal theory of suicide ¹¹. In the case of senior citizens, these risk factors affect an already vulnerable age group with the highest age-related suicide rates ²⁰.

This study investigated the influence of social distancing during the COVID-19 restrictions period on suicide rates (SR). We addressed the following hypotheses:

A.SR increased in the total population under conditions compared to periods without restrictions. This applies to both the period of travel restrictions and that of restricting social contact.

B.Within the 70+ age group, the risk of suicide increased more strongly than in other age groups during COVID-19 restrictions.

C.A comparison with previous years shows that differences in SR within 2020 are not due to seasonal differences.

Methods

Results

A total of 2,791,131 LY were spent and 333 suicides were registered during the periods studied. In 2020, 18 suicides (LY: 100,278) were attributed to nR_2020, 17 (LY: 200,556) to R1_2020, and 7 (LY: 100,278) to R2_2020. In the previous years 2010 to 2019, 90 suicides (LY: 930,377) were attributed to nR_2010/19, 208 (LY: 1,860,754) to R1_2010/19, and 91 (LY: 930,377) to R2_2010/19. The suicide rates within the individual periods were 18.0, 8.5, 7.0 in nR_2020, R1_2020, and R2_2020, respectively.

The suicide risk in 2020 was found to be different between nR_2020 and the periods studied of R1_2020 χ² [1; N = 300,869] = 4.374, p = 0.037), and R2_2020 R2 (χ² [1; N = 200,581] = 3.999, p = 0.046).

The difference for nR compared to R1 and R2 also remained in a comparison with the previous years 2010 to 2019 (Test for Heterogeneity; periods nR vs R1: Q [df = 1] = 12.233, p < 0.001; periods nR vs R2: Q [df = 1] = 13.974, p < 0.001). The post hoc analysis showed that the described difference was due to high suicide rates in nR_2020 compared to nR_2010/19. The periods R1_2020 and R2_2020 were not different compared to the previous years.

For details, see Figure 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Suicide rates before and during COVID-19 restrictions.

This displays the suicide rates (SR, suicides per 100,000 life years) in 2020 (black columns) and the average SR of the years 2010–2019 (white columns). nR = period in 2020 without COVID-19 restrictions (and corresponding periods in previous years), R1 = period of moderate restrictions, R2 = period of severe restrictions. Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in the underlying suicide numbers and population sizes based on Chi-Square statistics. S = suicide numbers, Pop = population sizes (life years).

No gender- or age-related differences were demonstrated between R_2020, R1_2020, and R2_2020.

Discussion

Our hypotheses regarding suicide rates increasing during corona restrictions could not be confirmed. On the contrary, we found lower suicide rates during the pandemic restrictions in 2020 compared to previous months. However, a comparison with preceding years showed that this difference in 2020 was mainly caused by high suicide rates in the period without restrictions.

Results represent local suicide trends during the COVID-19 pandemic in a major city in Saxony. In Saxony, as in most regions of Germany, the prevalence and mortality rates of COVID-19 were comparatively low, with 135.8 and 251.0 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively ²⁴. The regional shut-down was much less restrictive than in other European countries, i.e. United Kingdom, France, Spain or Italy. At an early stage of the pandemic, the German government committed to support measures to prevent insolvencies and unemployment. Accordingly, results should be evaluated under these external conditions. Regional differences in the COVID-19 pandemic may produce regional differences in the mental health situation, economic crises and suicide rates. The findings of this study should not, therefore, be extrapolated uncritically to other regions or countries. It should not be assumed either that the trend described will remain stable. This study only provides a first regional snapshot.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a new phenomenon. Thus, it is not surprising, that little scientific evidence of suicide trends during the COVID-19 pandemic exist. A number of case reports describes a co-occurrence of suicidal behaviour and COVID-19, with the underlying factors being fear of infection ^25–27 or severe mental disorders such as hallucinations or delusions ^28–30. However, trends in suicide risks cannot be concluded from case reports or case series.

Projections based on underlying risk factors for suicide, such as unemployment, indicate rising suicide rates during the COVID-19 pandemic ^1,2. This does not contradict the reduced suicide risk found in our study, since unemployment has not yet risen in the region investigated. It illustrates, however, that suicide rates will not increase immediately, but possibly only with a time lag.

This is consistent with studies reporting no increase in suicidal behaviour, used as an indirect measure for suicide risk, in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic ^31–37. For instance, online surveys showed a decrease in suicidal thoughts and intention during the pandemic; presentation at emergency departments due to suicidal ideation decreased ³⁶, suicides in selective autopsy samples remained low ³⁷, and search engine users entered suicide-related terms less frequently ^31–33,35. However, the overall results are inhomogeneous, since other surveys indicate a high prevalence of suicidal thoughts during the pandemic, in particular under quarantine conditions ^3,38– 41.

The findings have led us to change our initial hypothesis. We predict the pandemic will see the following course of suicide rates; this will need to be verified in future studies: In an initial phase, the pandemic was perceived as an incalculable new threat without any social countermeasures being taken. In this phase of individual disorientation, suicide rates were unusually high.

In a second phase, with the COVID-19 restrictions, a social response to the threat was given. Rules were established to protect the most vulnerable individuals and to slow down the spread of the virus. The omnipresent concern for the well-being of fellow human beings led to an increased sense of social belonging despite physical distance. According to Durkheim ‘s theory, a temporary increase of social integration and cohesion results in a reduction in suicide rates ⁴². Some findings observed during the Second World War and the 9/11 terror attacks support this hypothesis, but it remains controversial ^43–45.

In a third phase, the pandemic could be perceived as more predictable and less threatening. The feeling of belonging may once again be increasingly determined by the quality and quantity of everyday contacts, which could continue to be reduced depending on the regulations. A rise in loneliness, unemployment and mental disorders may lead to a delayed increase in the suicide rates in the medium term. As other authors have stressed, it is important to distinguish between physical distance and social belonging ⁴⁶. A major challenge for suicide prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic is to find an answer to the following question: How can we succeed in maintaining a sense of social belonging in our society if physical distance persists in the medium term?

Conclusion

In the population studied, suicide rates decreased during the COVID-19 restrictions, but we expect suicide rates to increase with a time delay. Careful monitoring of suicide rates in the further course of the COVID-19 crisis is therefore essential. Accordingly, further investigations and meta-analytical approaches are urgently required to monitor suicide rates. In this sense, the available results represent a first step in this direction.