ABSTRACT
Objective To examine the association between dexamethasone use and mortality among hospitalized patients for COVID-19.
Design Multicenter observational retrospective cohort study.
Setting Greater Paris University hospitals, France.
Participants 12,217 adults hospitalized with COVID-19 between 24 January and 20 May 2020, including 171 patients (1.4%) who received dexamethasone orally or by intravenous perfusion during the visit.
Data source Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Health Data Warehouse.
Main outcome measures The primary endpoint was time to death. We compared this endpoint between patients who received dexamethasone and those who did not in time-to-event analyses adjusting for sex, age, obesity, current smoking status, any medical condition associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality, and clinical and biological severity of COVID-19 at admission, while stratifying by the need of respiratory support (i.e., oxygen or intubation). The primary analysis was a multivariable Cox model and the secondary analysis used a univariate Cox regression in a matched analytic sample.
Results Among patients who required respiratory support, the end-point event of death occurred in 10 patients (15.9%) who received dexamethasone and 298 patients (26.4%) who did not. In this group of patients, there was a significant association between dexamethasone use and reduced mortality in both the crude, unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.87, p=0.021) and the adjusted multivariable analysis (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.96, p=0.039). In the sensitivity analysis, the univariate Cox regression model in the matched analytic sample yielded a same tendency, albeit non-significant (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.14, p=0.077). Among patients without respiratory support, the end-point event of death occurred in 14 patients (13.0%) who received dexamethasone and 1,086 patients (10.0%) who did not. In this group of patients, there was no significant association between dexamethasone use and the endpoint. When examining the association between the cumulative dose of dexamethasone received during the visit and the endpoint, we found that the administration of a cumulative dose between 60 mg to 150 mg among patients who required respiratory support was significantly associated with a lower risk of death in the crude, unadjusted analysis (HR, 0.28; SE, 0.58, p=0.028), the adjusted multivariable analysis (HR, 0.24; SE, 0.65, p=0.030), and in the univariate Cox regression model in the matched analytic sample (HR, 0.32; SE, 0.58, p=0.048), whereas no significant association was observed with a different dose. Among patients without respiratory support, there was no significant association between the cumulative dose of dexamethasone and the endpoint in the crude and in the adjusted multivariable analyses.
Conclusions In this observational study involving patients with Covid-19 who had been admitted to the hospital, dexamethasone use administered either orally or by intravenous injection at a cumulative dose between 60 mg and 150 mg was associated with decreased mortality among those requiring respiratory support.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr Hoertel has received personal fees and non-financial support from Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. Dr Limosin has received speaker and consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag outside the submitted work. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
This work did not receive any external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This observational study using routinely collected data received approval from the Institutional Review Board of the AP-HP clinical data warehouse (decision CSE-20-20_COVID19, IRB00011591). AP-HP clinical Data Warehouse initiative ensures patient information and consent regarding the different approved studies and data opt-out service through a transparency portal in accordance with European Regulation on data protection and authorization number 1980120 from National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties (CNIL). All procedures related to this work adhered to the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest Dr Hoertel has received personal fees and non-financial support from Lundbeck, outside the submitted work. Dr Limosin has received speaker and consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag outside the submitted work. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability Statement Data from the AP-HP Health Data Warehouse can be obtained at https://eds.aphp.fr//.
Authorship NH designed the study, contributed to statistical analyses, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MSR contributed to study design, performed statistical analyses and critically revised the manuscript. FL contributed to study design and critically revised the manuscript for scientific content. RV contributed to statistical analyses and critically revised the manuscript for scientific content. NB and ASJ contributed to study design and critically revised the manuscript for scientific content. NB, ASJ, AN, NP, CD, AG, GL, MB, and AB contributed to database build process. AN, NP, CD, AG, GL, MB, and AB critically revised the manuscript for scientific content.
Funding source This work did not receive any external funding.
Data Availability
Data from the AP-HP Health Data Warehouse can be obtained at https://eds.aphp.fr//.
