Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) in comparison to phenytoin (PHT) as second line antiseizure medication (ASM) for Pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (SE).
Data source PubMed, Embase, Google scholar, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing LEV and PHT as second line agent for convulsive SE in children <18 years published between 1st January 2000 to 30th September 2020.
Data extraction The data was pooled regarding the proportion of children achieving seizure cessation within 5-60 minutes of completion of study drug infusion (primary outcome); and seizure cessation within 5 minutes, time to achieve seizure cessation, seizure recurrence between 1-24 hours, intubation, and cardiovascular instability (secondary outcomes). Data was analysed using RevMan version 5.4 and quality analysis was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The study protocol was submitted to PROSPERO for registration.
Data synthesis Eleven RCTs with 2177 children (1024 received LEV and 988 received PHT) were enrolled. Seizure cessation within 5-60 minutes was similar with both the drugs [81% in LEV vs. 76% in PHT, risk ratio (RR)=1.04, 95% CI 0.9-1.13, p=0.29]. Seizure recurrences within 1-24 hours was higher with PHT as comparison to LEV (15% vs 9%, RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.99, p=0.04). Seizure cessation within 5 minutes, time to achieve seizure cessation, requirement of intubation/mechanical ventilation, and cardiovascular instability were similar with both the drugs. Three studies had low risk of bias and eight studies had high risk of bias.
Conclusion The efficacy and safety of LEV is not superior to PHT as second line ASM medication for Pediatric convulsive SE. However, the seizure recurrences between 1-24 hours were significantly higher with PHT in comparison to LEV.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB is not applicable and not obtained
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be available
