Abstract
In this study, we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the Netherlands, in the context of global viral population since the beginning of the pandemic. We have identified the most variant sites on the whole genome as well as the stable, conserved ones on the S and N proteins. We found four mutations, S:D614G, NSP12b:P314L, NSP3:F106F, to be the most frequent ones that dominate the SARS-CoV-2 population outside of China. We detected novel variants of SARS-CoV-2 almost unique to the Netherlands that form localized clusters, indicating community spread. We emphasize that while SARS-CoV-2 is evolving, and the number of mutations from the reference sequence is increasing, we observe only little diversity in the new variants as we enter the later stages of the pandemic. Our analyses suggest we have diverged away from the current SARS-CoV-2 reference enough that the reference should be re-evaluated to represent the current viral population more accurately. We assert our work provides valuable information on the genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 and its local dynamics in the Netherlands, especially for DNA-based diagnostic, therapeutic or vaccine development against COVID-19. We suggest sequence-based analyses should opt for a consensus representation to adequately cover the genomic variation observed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data is available in the supplementary files.