ABSTRACT
Question(s) What is the impact of including an allied health assistant (AHA) role on physiotherapy service delivery in terms of service provision, scope of practice and skill mix changes in an acute respiratory service?
Design A pragmatic pre-post design study examined physiotherapy services across two three-month periods: current service delivery [P1] and current service delivery plus AHA [P2].
Outcome measures Clinical and non-clinical activity contributing to physiotherapy services delivery quantified as number, type and duration (per day) of all staff activity, and categorised for skill level (AHA, junior, senior).
Results Overall physiotherapy service delivery increased in P2 compared to P1 (n=4730 vs n=3048). Physiotherapists undertook fewer respiratory (p < 0.001) and exercise treatments (p < 0.001) but increased patient reviews for inpatients (p < 0.001) and at multidisciplinary clinics in P2 (56% vs 76%, p < 0.01). The AHA accounted for 20% of all service provision. AHA activity comprised mainly non-direct clinical care including oversight of respiratory equipment use (e.g. supply, set-up, cleaning, loan audits) and other patient related administrative tasks associated with delegation handovers, supervision and clinical documentation (72%) and delegated supervision of established respiratory (5%) and exercise treatments (10%) and delegated exercise tests (3%). The AHA completed most of the exercise tests (n = 25). AHA non-direct clinical tasks included departmental management activities such as statistics and ongoing training (11%). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion Inclusion of an AHA in an acute respiratory care service changed physiotherapy service provision. The AHA completed delegated routine clinical and non-clinical tasks. Physiotherapists increased clinic activity and annual reviews. Including an AHA role offers safe and sustainable options for enhancing physiotherapy service provision in acute respiratory care services.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The project met the National Statement definition of a project that is exempt from full ethical review on that basis that it is an audit/quality assurance. Ethics was approved on this basis and project not registered as a clinical trial therfore.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a Queensland Health Allied Health Research Scheme Grant (2015-2017).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval: The Prince Charles Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (HREC/25/QPCH/68) and Australian Catholic University's Human Research Ethics Committee(s) (2017-51N) approved this study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: kathleen.hall{at}acu.edu.au
lyndal.maxwell{at}acu.edu.au
michael.steele{at}acu.edu.au
robyn.cobb{at}health.qld.gov.au
rebecca.chambers{at}health.qld.gov.au
mark.roll{at}health.qld.gov.au
scott.bell{at}health.qld.gov.au
suzanne.kuys{at}acu.edu.au
Ethics approval: The Prince Charles Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (HREC/25/QPCH/68) and Australian Catholic University’s Human Research Ethics Committee(s) (2017-51N) approved this study.
Competing interests: None
Source(s) of support: This research was supported by a Queensland Health Allied Health Research Scheme Grant (2015-2017).
Discussion section updated to clarify outcomes further.
Data Availability
Data is part of current PhD process and further information can be requested through the corresponding author.
