Abstract
The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate the impact of having had cancer on COVID-19 risk and prognosis during the first wave of the pandemic (27 February – 13 May 2020) in Reggio Emilia Province. Prevalent cancer cases diagnosed between 1996 and December 2019 were linked with the provincial COVID-19 surveillance system. We compared cancer survivors (CS)’ cumulative incidence of being tested, testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, being hospitalized, and dying of COVID-19 with that of the general population; we compared COVID-19 prognosis in CS and in patients without cancer.
15,391 people (1527 CS) underwent RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, of whom 4541 (447 CS) tested positive; 541 (113 CS) died of COVID-19. The cumulative incidences of being tested, testing positive, COVID-19 hospitalization, and death were lower in CS: age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios were 1.28 [95%CI = 1.21, 1.35], 1.06 [95%CI = 0.96, 1.18], 1.27 [95%CI = 1.09, 1.48], and 1.39 [95%CI = 1.12, 1.71], respectively. CS had worse prognosis when diagnosed with COVID-19, particularly those below the age of 70 (age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of death 5.03; [95%CI = 2.59, 9.75]), while the OR decreased after age 70. The OR of death was higher for patients with a recent diagnosis, i.e. <2 years (OR=2.92; 95%CI = 1.64, 5.21), or metastases (OR=2.09; 95%CI = 0. 88, 4.93).
Cancer patients showed the same probability of being infected, despite a slightly higher probability of being tested, than the general population, nevertheless they were at higher risk of death once infected.
Novelty and impact Cancer survivors during the first wave of the pandemic showed higher COVID-19 cumulative incidence and mortality. When infected, they had worse prognosis, particularly in people younger than age 70 or those with a recent diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding were received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Area Vasta Emilia Nord Ethics Committee (no. 2020/0045199). The Ethics Committee authorized the use of patient data, even in the absence of consent, if all reasonable efforts had been made to contact that patient.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Researchers who would like to access individual data should present their request, together with a study protocol, to the Area Vasta Emilia Nord Ethics Committee for approval (CEReggioEmilia{at}ausl.re.it).
List of abbreviations
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- COVID-19
- Coronavirus Disease 19
- CS
- Cancer Survivors
- ICU
- Intensive Care Unit
- IRR
- Incidence Rate Ratios
- OR
- Odds Ratio
- RE-CR
- Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry
- RT-PCR
- Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
- UK
- United Kingdom
- WHO
- World Health Organization
