Abstract
Background RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) is the acknowledged gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rising demands for repetitive screens and mass-testing necessitate, however, the development of additional test strategies. Saliva may serve as an alternative to NPS as its collection is simple, non-invasive and amenable for mass- and home-testing but rigorous validation of saliva particularly in children is missing.
Methods We conducted a large-scale head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR in saliva and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) of 1270 adults and children reporting to outpatient test centers and an emergency unit for an initial SARS-CoV-2 screen. The saliva collection strategy developed utilizes common, low-cost plastic tubes, does not create biohazard waste at collection and was tailored for self-collection and suitability for children.
Results In total, 273 individuals were tested SARS-CoV-2 positive in either NPS or saliva. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results in the two specimens showed a high agreement (Overall Percent Agreement = 97.8%). Despite lower viral loads in saliva of both adults and children, detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva compared well to NPS (Positive Percent Agreement = 92.5%). Importantly, in children, SARS-CoV-2 infections were more often detected in saliva than NPS (Positive Predictive Value = 84.8%), underlining that NPS sampling in children can be challenging.
Conclusions The comprehensive parallel analysis reported here establishes saliva as a generally reliable specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with particular advantages for testing children that is readily applicable to increase and facilitate repetitive and mass-testing in adults and children.
Article Summary Main Points Comparison with nasopharyngeal swabs in a large test center-based study confirms that saliva is a reliable and convenient material for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in adults and increases detection efficacy in children.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants of the Swiss federal office of public health (FOPH) and the University of Zurich Foundation to A.T. Roche Diagnostics supported the study with PCR kits and consumables. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Zurich Cantonal Ethics Commission waived the necessity for a formal ethical evaluation based on the Swiss Federal Human Research Act, as the collection of saliva in parallel to a scheduled nasopharyngeal swab induces no risk (Req-2020-00398). No additional personal data beyond the usual information on symptoms and duration required by the FOPH for all SARS-CoV-2 tests in Switzerland was collected. Due to the ethics waiver no informed consent had to be collected.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* shared contribution
Extended cohort now including 170 children.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon request.
