Abstract
Background COVID-19 vaccination could be a promising approach in controlling the pandemic, but its success strongly relies on the acceptance of vaccines among various populations including young adults who are especially vulnerable to COVID-19 due to their active lifestyle and perception of invulnerability. Vaccine acceptance decisions can be influenced by multiple factors and people may weigh these factors differently in their decision making. The current study aims to explore COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina and examine how they weigh these factors according to their levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (i.e., acceptance, hesitance, refusal).
Methods Online survey data were collected from 1062 college students in South Carolina between September and October 2020. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to compare perceived importance of 12 factors affecting levels of vaccine acceptance, controlling for key demographic variables.
Results About 60.6% of the college students reported they would definitely or likely take COVID-19 vaccine when available. Duration of vaccine protection, vaccine accessibility, and authoritative advice (e.g., if vaccination is recommended by school, government, or doctors) were considered important among the acceptance group; Negative consequences of vaccination and vaccine characteristics (i.e., ways the vaccine will be administered, and where the vaccine is made) were considered important by the refusal group; The hesitance group considered the same factors important as the refusal group did but also considered duration of vaccine protection and recommendation by school or doctors important.
Conclusion Our findings suggest relatively low vaccine acceptance among college students in South Carolina and different factors that play a role in their vaccine uptake decision according to their levels of acceptance. Tailored vaccine promotion messages should address specific concerns among the refusal and hesitancy groups. School could play a positive role in vaccine campaign since the reluctancy group considered that recommendation by their school was important in their decision making. Health educators also need to pay particular attention to the refusal group who do not value duration of protection or authoritative advice as much as their counterparts in their vaccine decision making.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award Number of NIH R01MH0112376-3S1 and R01AI127203-4S1. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Institute Review Board at University of South Carolina.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data availability can be contacted through the corresponding author.
