Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Detection of SARS-CoV2 antigen in human saliva may be a reliable tool for large scale screening

View ORCID ProfilePriya Kannian, Chandra Lavanya, Krittika Ravichandran, Bagavad Gita Jayaraman, Pasuvaraj Mahanathi, Veeraraghavan Ashwini, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Gunaseelan Rajan, Kannan Ranganathan, Stephen J. Challacombe, Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque, Newell W. Johnson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.17.20248437
Priya Kannian
1VHS Laboratory Services, Department of Clinical Research, VHS Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Priya Kannian
  • For correspondence: priyakannian{at}gmail.com
Chandra Lavanya
2Department of Oral Pathology, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krittika Ravichandran
3Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bagavad Gita Jayaraman
3Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pasuvaraj Mahanathi
1VHS Laboratory Services, Department of Clinical Research, VHS Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veeraraghavan Ashwini
1VHS Laboratory Services, Department of Clinical Research, VHS Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy
4VHS-Infectious Diseases Medical Centre, VHS Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gunaseelan Rajan
3Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kannan Ranganathan
2Department of Oral Pathology, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen J. Challacombe
5Faculty of Dentistry & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque
6University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Newell W. Johnson
2Department of Oral Pathology, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India
3Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India
5Faculty of Dentistry & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, UK
7Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction SARS-CoV2, the aetiological agent of the current COVID-19 pandemic, has been detected in saliva and recently implicated in several oral diseases. Collection of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and detection by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) requires medical / technical expertise. A reliable and easy to handle point-of-care (POC) test is highly desirable, especially to curb transmission. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated a commercially available POC rapid antigen test (RAT) for the detection of SARS-CoV2 antigens in the saliva of RT-PCR confirmed positive and negative patients.

Methods Thirty saliva samples of 10 saliva RT-PCR negative and 20 saliva RT-PCR positive patients were tested by RAT.

Results RAT was negative in 10/10 (100%) RT-PCR-negative samples; positive in 9/20 (45%) RT-PCR-positive samples; concordance was 63% (p=0.001). Patients with positive RAT had higher virus copies in their NPS samples compared to the RAT-negative patients. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.01).

Conclusion Thus, the POC RAT may be used to detect SARS-CoV2 as a reliable tool for self-testing, large-scale population screening and emergency medical/dental screening. Patients negative by RAT should be confirmed by RT-PCR.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This study is not a clinical trial.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by intramural research funds of Chennai Dental Research Foundation, Chennai, India.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the VHS-Institutional Ethics Committee (proposal #: VHS-IEC/69-2020).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data pertinent to the manuscript has been uploaded with the manuscript files.

  • Abbreviations

    SARS-CoV2
    severe acute respiratory syndrome – coronavirus 2
    COVID-19
    coronavirus disease 2019
    RT-PCR
    reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
    NPS
    nasopharyngeal swab
    POC
    point-of-care
    RAT
    rapid antigen test
    ACE-2
    angiotensin converting enzyme-2
    ICMR
    Indian Council of Medical Research
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted December 19, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Detection of SARS-CoV2 antigen in human saliva may be a reliable tool for large scale screening
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Detection of SARS-CoV2 antigen in human saliva may be a reliable tool for large scale screening
    Priya Kannian, Chandra Lavanya, Krittika Ravichandran, Bagavad Gita Jayaraman, Pasuvaraj Mahanathi, Veeraraghavan Ashwini, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Gunaseelan Rajan, Kannan Ranganathan, Stephen J. Challacombe, Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque, Newell W. Johnson
    medRxiv 2020.12.17.20248437; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.17.20248437
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Detection of SARS-CoV2 antigen in human saliva may be a reliable tool for large scale screening
    Priya Kannian, Chandra Lavanya, Krittika Ravichandran, Bagavad Gita Jayaraman, Pasuvaraj Mahanathi, Veeraraghavan Ashwini, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Gunaseelan Rajan, Kannan Ranganathan, Stephen J. Challacombe, Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque, Newell W. Johnson
    medRxiv 2020.12.17.20248437; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.17.20248437

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)