Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and potential role in COVID-19 severity in patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil

View ORCID ProfileFabíola Marques de Carvalho, View ORCID ProfileLeandro Nascimento Lemos, View ORCID ProfileLuciane Prioli Ciapina, View ORCID ProfileRennan Garcias Moreira, View ORCID ProfileAlexandra Gerber, View ORCID ProfileAna Paula C Guimarães, View ORCID ProfileTatiani Fereguetti, View ORCID ProfileVirgínia Antunes de Andrade Zambelli, View ORCID ProfileRenata Avila, View ORCID ProfileTailah Bernardo de Almeida, View ORCID ProfileJheimson da Silva Lima, View ORCID ProfileShana Priscila Coutinho Barroso, View ORCID ProfileMauro Martins Teixeira, View ORCID ProfileRenan Pedra Souza, View ORCID ProfileCynthia Chester Cardoso, View ORCID ProfileRenato Santana Aguiar, View ORCID ProfileAna Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248501
Fabíola Marques de Carvalho
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fabíola Marques de Carvalho
Leandro Nascimento Lemos
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leandro Nascimento Lemos
Luciane Prioli Ciapina
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luciane Prioli Ciapina
Rennan Garcias Moreira
2Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rennan Garcias Moreira
Alexandra Gerber
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexandra Gerber
Ana Paula C Guimarães
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana Paula C Guimarães
Tatiani Fereguetti
3Hospital Eduardo de Menezes, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tatiani Fereguetti
Virgínia Antunes de Andrade Zambelli
3Hospital Eduardo de Menezes, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Virgínia Antunes de Andrade Zambelli
Renata Avila
3Hospital Eduardo de Menezes, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Renata Avila
Tailah Bernardo de Almeida
4Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira, Marinha do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tailah Bernardo de Almeida
Jheimson da Silva Lima
5Unidade de tratamento de queimados, Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jheimson da Silva Lima
Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso
6Instituto de Pesquisas Biomédicas, Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso
Mauro Martins Teixeira
2Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mauro Martins Teixeira
Renan Pedra Souza
2Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Renan Pedra Souza
Cynthia Chester Cardoso
7Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cynthia Chester Cardoso
Renato Santana Aguiar
2Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Renato Santana Aguiar
Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
1Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Petrópolis, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
  • For correspondence: atrv{at}lncc.br
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Secondary bacterial and fungal infections are associated with respiratory viral infections and invasive mechanical ventilation. In Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), lung injury by SARS-CoV-2 and impaired immune response can provide a favorable environment for microorganism growth and colonization in hospitalized individuals. Recent studies suggest that secondary bacterial pneumonia is a risk factor associated with COVID-19. In Brazil, knowledge about microbiota present in COVID-19 patients is incipient. This work describes the microbiota of 21 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units from two Brazilian centers. We identified respiratory, nosocomial and bacterial pathogens as prevalent microorganisms. Other bacterial opportunistic and commensal species are also represented. Virulence factors of these pathogenic species, metabolic pathways used to evade and modulate immunological processes and the interconnection between bacterial presence and virulence in COVID-19 progression are discussed.

Article Summary Line We identified respiratory, nosocomial and bacterial pathogens as prevalent microorganisms in 21 Brazilian COVID-19 patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. Pathogen virulence factors and immune response evasion metabolic pathways are correlated to COVID-19 severity.

Introduction

Severe COVID-19 cases are characterized by systemic hyperinflammation and immune dysfunction, which may lead to lung damage. Infection begins with the internalization of the viral complex through the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the host cell. ACE2 expression reduces after SARS-CoV-2-infection, resulting in an increase in angiotensin II which lead to pathophysiological effects that include vasoconstriction, increased inflammation and fibrosis (1). Lung edema, endothelial and epithelial injuries are accompanied by an influx of neutrophils into the interstitium and bronchoalveolar space, resulting in impairment of arterial oxygenation (2). Infection of alveolar macrophages by SARS-CoV and neutrophil infiltration are important triggers of the cytokine storm, which is extensively associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality (3).

In the critical stage of COVID-19, cytokine storm is continuous, contributing to vascular congestion, complement cascade activation and over disseminated intravascular coagulation (4). Hypoxia is aggravated and invasive mechanical ventilation may be required for life maintenance. Under these conditions, variation in oxygen tension, alveolar ventilation, deposition of inhaled particles, blood flow and concentration of inflammatory cells are factors that directly affect lung microbial growth conditions (5, 6). In addition, irregular innate immune response in acute lung injury, mainly during the process of neutrophil recruitment, may favor bacterial infections, which are also regulated by virulence factors (7).

In Influenza and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), secondary bacterial infection has been reported during intensive care unit admission and during use of invasive mechanical ventilation. Data in literature pointed out that occurrence of co-infection or secondary bacterial pneumonia was observed in 11% to 35% of individuals with laboratory confirmed influenza (8), and that Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were present in 35% and 28% of patients, respectively. In Canada, Chlamydophila pneumoniae or Mycoplasma pneumoniae were abundant in up to 30% of SARS patients (9). Bacterial infection was also identified in COVID-19 cases (10 - 12). Studies conducted in China, the USA, Spain and Thailand, showed that secondary bacterial infection was present in 14% of patients, with occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae within 1–4 days of COVID-19 disease onset (13,14). According to Rawson et al. (2020)(15), the extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics can predispose COVID-19 patients to acquisition of bacterial infections and increase multidrug-resistance.

Colonizing species in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, prevalence of bacterial infection and mechanism of co-or secondary-infection remain poorly understood. In Brazil, an investigation of bacterial microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 was conducted in only one patient and concise results showed the predominance of Lautropia, Prevotella and Haemophilus genera (16). In-depth work was not performed.

This study aims to determine the microbiota of 21 COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units from two Brazilian centers, focusing on prevalence of bacterial pathogens, and to correlate the microbiota with the immunological disorder characteristic of Coronavirus disease 2019.

Material and Methods

Study cohort and data collection

Twenty-one COVID-19 patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICU) from Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias (Rio de Janeiro) and Hospital Eduardo de Menezes (Belo Horizonte) were included in this study. Both hospitals are located in cities in the Southeast region of Brazil. All patients had positive RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1). Samples identification (IDs) were modified to preserve the patient’s integrity. The study cohort included 12 males and 9 females and no age restrictions were applied (ranging from 37 to 89 years of age).The present study was approved by the Ethics Commission from Hospital Naval Marcílio Dias and Hospital Eduardo de Menezes (protocol number 32382820.3.0000.5256 and 31462820.3.0000.5149). Clinical and demographic characteristics of the 21 patients were obtained from medical records and summarized in Table1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of the clinical and demographic aspects of the 21 COVID-19 patients analyzed.

DNA extraction and sequencing

DNA was extracted using standard manufacturer’s protocols for the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen, Germany). Metagenomic libraries were constructed using the Nextera DNA Flex Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA). Sequencing was performed in a NextSeq 500 System with a NextSeq 500/550 High Output Kit v2.5 (300 Cycles) (Illumina, USA).

Bioinformatics analysis

Sequencing files were submitted to MG-RAST (version 4.0.3) (17) for taxonomical and functional inferences. Sequences were trimmed using default parameters and human sequences removed by screening against Homo sapiens. Species were identified from MG-RAST using RefSeq and functional abundances were obtained using SEED subsystem database. For both analyses, the Best Hit Classification criteria and alignment cutoff applied included an e-value > 10-5, a minimum identity of 60%, and a minimum alignment of 15. Low abundance species (≤ 50 absolute counts of the sum of all samples) were removed to avoid false-positives and minimize the error of taxonomical predictions (18). The number of species was resampled so that all samples had the same library size. Prevalent species were detected using the microbiome R package (19), considering only those that occurred in 75% of all patients. Phyloseq R package was used to estimate the Shannon diversity index (20).

Results and Discussion

The study included only adult patients, the majority of whom were above 65 years of age (42.8%). Males represent 57% of the patients sampled. The period between symptom onset and sample collection varied from 4 to 34 days. All individuals were admitted to intensive care units and invasive ventilatory support was necessary in 95.2% of the cases. No previous pulmonary impairment was reported, except for one individual. Most patients had at least one of the main comorbidities associated with disease severity. Diabetes represented 50% of the cases studied, followed by obesity and hypertension (33% in both) and cardiovascular disease (23.8%) (Table 1). Tracheal lavage samples with SARS-CoV-2 infectivity had higher abundances of bacterial respiratory and nosocomial species (Table 2). To check the relationship between microbial diversity and the proportion of microbial pathogens, we estimated diversity using the Shannon index and calculated the relative abundance of pathogens (Figure 1). The proportion of microbial pathogens was based on the relative abundance of individual pathogens divided by the total number of species in the microbiome. First, we observed a negative correlation (−0.9733005; p ≤ 0.05) between these two parameters, indicating that the prevalence of pathogens in all samples is inverse to diversity, causing a decrease in species richness. A high proportion of pathogens can be explained by the potential imbalance between microbial immigration and elimination, and regional growth conditions, as proposed by Dickson and collaborators (2015)(21).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Abundance of the fifty most prevalent species obtained from COVID-19 patients using MG-RAST inference.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Pearson correlation between the Shannon diversity index and the relative abundance of pathogenic species identified in the 21 COVID-19 patients.

Dickson and collaborators (2014, 2015) (6, 21) report that, while in healthy lungs the immigration and elimination processes are more determinant for microbial composition, in advanced lung diseases, pulmonary pathogenesis is a consequence of respiratory dysbiosis. Hyperventilation accelerates the influx of air-borne microbes and microbial elimination is reduced by bronchoconstriction and impaired mucociliary clearance. This condition provides a nutrient-rich growth medium and decreased oxygen concentration, influencing bacterial reproduction. In addition, these authors propose that the response to inflammation and endothelial and epithelial injury increases vascular permeability, promoting the escape of nutrient-rich fluid into the alveolar compartment, restoring the nutrient supply and selectively favoring the growth of specific lung pathogens. Our results suggest that COVID-19 reduces microbial diversity and increases the proportion of pathogens, similar to other acute and chronic lung diseases (22).

Almost 75% of the microbiota present in patients was composed of bacteria whose diversity was inferred from the fifty most prevalent species (Figure 2 and Table 2). Most respiratory pathogens were composed of Acinetobacter baumannii (corresponding to 16.5% of all bacterial species), Streptococcus pneumoniae (8.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.6%) and Staphylococcus aureus (3.4%). Nosocomial pathogens mainly included fungi Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis, representing 11.2% and 8.1% of Eukarya domain, as well as the bacteria Enterococcus faecalis (1.5%) and Escherichia coli (0.5%).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Relative abundance of the 50 most prevalent species identified in the 21 COVID-19 patients. The characteristics of the individuals analyzed, such as age range, comorbidities and time (days) from onset of symptoms until sample collection were represented.

Furthermore, the patients analyzed in our work showed a diversity of other pathogenic microorganisms, such as the uncommon Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus (S. agalactiae and S. pyogenes), sporulating Bacillus (B. anthracis and B. thuringiensis) and Acidovorax spp., although less frequently (Figure 2). Curiously, the opportunistic microorganisms Delftia acidovorans and Coprobacillus spp. were found with an abundance of almost 6% and 2%, respectively. Delftia acidovorans is usually not pathogenic, but catheter-related bacteremia and cases of pneumonia with lung cavity formation has been observed (23, 24).

As expected, an elevated occurrence of the bacterial respiratory pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae was found independent of the comorbidity, while in patients without comorbidity the occurrence of respiratory and nosocomial pathogens was drastically reduced, with exception of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis (Figure 2 and Table 2). In contrast, Acinetobacter baumannii was significantly increased in patients with higher SARS-CoV2 infection period (RJ2 and RJ3 samples). No significant difference or direct association was observed between pathogen abundance and comorbidity type. However, the microbiota here identified reinforce the severity of infection under weakened health conditions.

Additionally, a large diversity of the oropharynx commensal species was identified, such as Rothia mucilaginosa, Parvimonas micra, Actinomyces odontolyticus, and Streptococcus anginosus (Table 2). R. mucilaginosa has been associated to pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (25). Furthermore, an association of co-infection by A. odontolyticus and P. micra or Streptococcus spp. to lung abscess and acute respiratory failure was reported (26, 27). Although respiratory disease caused by these commensals is a rare event, their presence in individuals with compromised immune responses should not be neglected.

The bacterial pathogens identified in this study, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, may promote virulence and evade the host immune response by biofilm production, induction of hemolysins, pneumolysin, phospholipases, iron acquisition factors, cytokines, adhesins, and complement system resistance, besides other virulence factors (28 - 30).

In pulmonary and catheter-associated infections, biofilm formation can be favored by microbial interaction in endotracheal tubes and mechanical-ventilation apparatus, resulting in a diverse microbial complex and enhanced antimicrobial resistance (31,32). Studies demonstrated that A. baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecium are also frequently recovered from endotracheal tubes (33-35). In addition, in clinical isolates with persistent infections, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and C. albicans are the predominant biofilm-producers and species with more biofilm formation capacity are frequently observed to be multidrug-resistant (36-38). For some of these microorganisms, the increase of biofilm, production of bacterial virulence factors and antibiotic resistance are related to enrichment of macrophage secretory products in culture and oxygen-limiting conditions (39, 40). In S. aureus, for example, biofilm is related to accumulation of activated macrophages exhibiting anti-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic properties (41). Moreover, it was observed that, when in biofilm, bacterial species are more resistant to the immune response, evading neutrophil mediated phagocytosis (42).

Hemolysin, an important virulence factor of S. aureus, E. coli, and Enterococcus faecalis (43, 44), is a protein that causes erythrocyte lyse and disrupts the cell membrane, contributing to lung injury and pneumonia. In Streptococcus pneumoniae, when pulmonary surfactant is deficient, there is an expression of hemolysin, which is correlated with lung epithelial cell injury and induction of interleukin (IL)–8 (45).

Similar to hemolysin, pneumolysin is a pore-forming toxin, and most of its isoforms exhibit hemolytic activity. This protein is crucial for virulence and chronic bacteraemia of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and together with polysaccharide capsule proteins and adhesins reduce the S. pneumoniae entrapment in the pulmonary mucus, permitting adherence and inflammatory responses and activating complement and apoptosis (46).

For Candida species identified in this work, phospholipase and biofilm are described as the major virulence factors (47, 48). Phospholipases possess an important role in lung diseases, promoting change in membrane composition, stimulating chemokines and cytokines, and altering gas exchange and as a lung surfactant (49).

Hemolysin, phospholipase and biofilm are some of the many pathogenicity factors in Acinetobacter baumannii. Successful fitness of this bacteria, however, is a consequence of a large virulence repertoire, also composed by outer membrane proteins, secretion systems, surface adhesins, glycoconjugates and iron-chelating activities, which can explain its multi-resistance to antibiotics in nosocomial infections (28).

Biofilm-based infections are significantly less susceptible to antimicrobial agents and their treatment is extremely difficult. According to Sanchez et al., 2013 (37), the investigation of biofilm forming capacity in patients with diverse infective sources revealed that Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli are strong biofilm producers, at levels greater than or equal to Staphylococcus epidermidis, a positive biofilm producing strain. The greatest number of biofilm producing strains corresponded to P. aeruginosa and S. aureus species.

Interestingly, the metabolic profile obtained in our study correlated to virulence factors of the species described, particularly biofilm (Tables 3-6). Within Central Carbohydrate Metabolism (Table 3), the TCA cycle was the predominant pathway (18%), with abundance of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase enzyme (Table 4). According to Lu and authors (2019) (50), alteration in the metabolites from the TCA cycle, amino acid metabolism, and glycerolipid pathways were observed during biofilm production. Furthermore, characterization of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase from Streptococcus pneumoniae showed that this enzyme plays an important role in pneumococcal infection, being necessary for the survival and capsular polysaccharide production of pneumococci within the host (51).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Functional pathway of Central Carbohydrate Metabolism, related to virulence factors reported for the species identified in this work.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Functional profile of TCA_Cycle pathway, related to virulence factors reported for the species identified in this work.

Besides enzymes associated with biofilm formation, we identified adhesins, permeases for antibiotic export, resistance and toxins, and superantigens belong to the Virulence, Disease and Defense functional category (Table 5). The most abundant adhesins are fibronectin/fibrinogen-binding proteins, although high numbers of sortases, related to attachment of specific proteins to the cell wall, were also found. Toxins and superantigens are composed of the streptolysin S locus, which produces the beta-haemolytic phenotype. Streptolysin S causes impaired phagocytic clearance and promotes epithelial cell cytotoxicity, enhancing the effects of M protein and streptolysin O (52). In the Membrane Transport category, protein secretion system Types I, V, and VI are highlighted, with abundance of exoprotein involved in heme utilization, cytolysin activator and adhesin (Table 6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Functional profile of Virulence, Disease and Defense pathway, related to virulence factors reported for the species identified in this work.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6.

Functional profile of Membrane Transport pathway, related to virulence factors reported for the species identified in this work.

The scenario highlights the high occurrence of potentially virulent pathogens, which can contribute to severity of lung infection in Coronavirus Disease 2019 patients admitted to intensive care units. Moreover, the prevalence of respiratory pathogens observed in COVID-19 patients analyzed can be orchestrated mainly by the complex and distinct immune events in response to lung damage, as well as by the ecological model proposed by Dickson and collaborators (2014, 2015) (26, 25), which indicate that several lung diseases can alter the growth of local microbiota, leading to an increase in bacterial abundance. A cellular model to explain the bacterial species described in our study correlated to processes that aggravate COVID-19 is presented (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Model for an interplay of the bacteria found in COVID-19 patients, virulence factors and free-iron in immune response and disease severity. In severe lung diseases, hyperventilation contributes to microbial influx and reduces the elimination of microorganisms. Tecidual injury promotes a rich environment for growth of specific lung pathogens into the alveolar compartment. Bacterial pathogens evade the host immune response by biofilm production, induction of hemolysins, iron acquisition factors, adhesins, and other virulence factors. The SARS-CoV-2 and bacterial pathogens promote erythrocyte lysis, causing heme(Hb)/iron(Fe) liberation. Heme uptake is required for bacterial host colonization and increased production of virulence factors. Bacterial virulence factors, as well as free-heme, activates the inflammasome, contributing to neutrophil inflammation, cytokine elevation and pathogenesis processes. This figure was generated using the BioRender (available at https://biorender.com/).

Impairment in neutrophil function, macrophage depletion and excessive inflammation has been reported as an important factor in the progression of lower respiratory tract pathologies (53). It was demonstrated that alveolar macrophage depletion could facilitate the bacterial infection by the establishment of a niche for secondary Streptococcus pneumoniae infection, altering cellular innate immunity and resulting in lethal pneumonia (54). Additionally, neutrophilia plays an important role in bacterial pulmonary diseases, including those caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus (55). Interestingly, Sodhi and collaborators (2019) (56) demonstrated that impaired neutrophil and innate immune response might be mediated by variations in the activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). In bacterial lung infection, when pulmonary active ACE2 levels vary dynamically, neutrophil influx increases, compromising the host-defense capability and heightened inflammatory response, with subsequent elevation of infection severity and mortality

Similar to Coronavirus Disease 2019, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show vascular permeabilization, platelet activation, thrombosis, adhesion molecule expression, leukocyte recruitment, and complement activation, which are also observed in injury-derived free heme (57). Su and authors (2020)(58) observed increased heme and heme oxygenase (HO)-1 in the blood system of severe COVID-19 patients. Moreover, an additional role of hemoglobinopathy, hypoxia and hyperferritinemia has been proposed in worsening COVID-19 infection (59).

Increase of cell-free hemoglobin (Hb) and HO-1 expression in lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid has been correlated to COPD and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) severity (60). Simon and authors (2009)(61) demonstrated an ACE-like activity of Hb in the conversion of angiotensin I to its active metabolites induced by ferrous- and ferryl-Hb, with a possible effect on vasoconstriction. Moreover, intratracheal administration of heme in mice led to alveolar-capillary barrier dysfunction and increased alveolar permeability, contributing to acute lung and ARDS (62). Curiously, heme uptake by pathogens plays an important role during bacterial infection. These microorganisms induce erythrocyte hemolysis caused by pore-forming toxins, such as hemolysin and phospholipases. Free-heme and iron acquired from erythrocyte disruption is required for invasion, growth and successful pathogen colonization in the host (63). In addition, Dutra and collaborators (2014)(64) showed that heme promotes the processing of caspase-1, inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion by macrophages that participate in the immune response induced by hemolysis, contributing to inflammation and pathogenesis. Strategies for interfering in inflammasome activation by bacterial pathogens have evolved (65), and together with SARS-Cov2, may contribute to a hyperactivated inflammatory response (66).

Interdependence between iron acquisition and virulence factors for bacterial pathogenesis have been demonstrated. In Streptococcus pneumoniae, iron is a critical factor for regulation of several enzymes. During pneumonia and bacteremia, the transcription of hemolysin, toxins, cell wall hydrolases and biofilm formation are increased in a positive Fe-dependent regulation (67). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, high iron concentrations are correlated to stimulation of aggregation, adhesion and biofilm formation, in a positive-modulation manner (68). The acquisition of heme-iron bound to erythrocyte hemoglobin is the preferred source of iron during S. aureus infection initiation, as well as for its proliferation. In the presence of heme, regulatory systems induced exotoxins such as cytolysins, proteases, and other virulence factors, promote Staphylococcal cellular adherence to host cells and resistance to neutrophil killing. Furthermore, iron and oxygen conditions have been shown to influence the TCA cycle activity of Staphylococcus aureus (69 - 71). Free-iron uptake by ferritin and haemolytic activity is employed by Candida albicans. Interestingly, it has been speculated that co-habitation of C. albicans with both commensal and pathogenic bacteria, in a synergistic interaction, enables C. albicans to obtain iron more easily (72).

In conclusion, the presence of respiratory pathogens, nosocomial bacteria and opportunistic microorganisms during colonization of the host, secrete an extensive diversity of virulence factors. These molecules favor hemolysis, cytokine activation and inflammation. The presence of free-iron exacerbates bacterial pathogenesis in cyclic connection with the worsening of the immune response, favoring the resistance of bacterial species. These findings provide intriguing insights into SARS-CoV2-bacterial interactions contributing to COVID-19 severity.

Data Availability

NGS data generated in our study is publicly available in SRA-NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), Bioproject accession PRJNA683652.

Data availability

NGS data generated in our study is publicly available in SRA-NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), Bioproject accession PRJNA683652.

Author Bio

F.M.C is currently a postdoctoral fellow in the Laboratory of Bioinformatics (LABINFO) of the National Laboratory of Scientific Computing (LNCC). Research interests comprise metagenomic (clinical and environmental) and comparative genomics.

Acknowledgments

This work was developed under the frameworks of Corona-ômica-RJ (FAPERJ = E-26/210.179/2020) and Rede Corona-ômica BR MCTI/FINEP (FINEP = 01.20.0029.000462/20, CNPq = 404096/2020-4). A.T.R.V. is supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq (303170/2017-4) and FAPERJ (E-26/202.903/20). R.S.A. is supported by CNPQ 312688/2017-2, 439119/2018-9; FAPERJ 202.922/2018 .C.C.C is supported by FAPERJ (E-26/202.791/2019) and S.P.C.B is supported by FAPERJ (E-26/010.000168/20).

Footnotes

  • R

References

  1. 1.↵
    Bourgonje AR, Abdulle AE, Timens W, Hillebrands JL, Navis GJ, Gordijn SJ, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Pathol. 2020;251:228–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Abraham E. Neutrophils and acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:S195–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Channappanavar R, Perlman S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017;39:529–39.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020;18: 844–47.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    West JB. Regional differences in the lung. Chest. 1978;74:426–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Dickson RP, Martinez FJ, Huffnagle GB. The role of the microbiome in exacerbations of chronic lung diseases. Lancet. 2014;384:691–702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Balamayooran G, Batra S, Fessler MB, Happel KI, Jeyaseelan S. Mechanisms of neutrophil accumulation in the lungs against bacteria. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010;43:5–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Klein EY, Monteforte B, Gupta A, Jiang W, May L, Hsieh YH, et al. The frequency of influenza and bacterial coinfection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016;10:394–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Zahariadis G, Gooley TA, Ryall P, Hutchinson C, Latchford MI, Fearon MA, et al. Risk of ruling out severe acute respiratory syndrome by ruling in another diagnosis: variable incidence of atypical bacteria coinfection based on diagnostic assays. Can Respir J. 2006;13:17–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Vaillancourt M, Jorth P. The Unrecognized Threat of Secondary Bacterial Infections with COVID-19. mBio. 2020;11:e01806–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.
    Bengoechea JA, Bamford CG. SARS-CoV-2, bacterial co-infections, and AMR: the deadly trio in COVID-19?. EMBO Mol Med. 2020;12:e12560.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Manohar P, Loh B, Nachimuthu R, Hua X, Welburn SC, Leptihn S. Secondary Bacterial Infections in Patients With Viral Pneumonia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:420.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Zhu X, Ge Y, Wu T, Zhao K, Chen Y, Wu B, et al. Co-infection with respiratory pathogens among COVID-2019 cases. Virus Res. 2020;285:198005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Langford BJ, So M, Raybardhan S, Leung V, Westwood D, MacFadden DR, et al. Bacterial co-infection and secondary infection in patients with COVID-19: a living rapid review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;22:30423–7.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Rawson TM, Moore LSP, Zhu N, Ranganathan N, Skolimowska K, Gilchrist M, et al. Bacterial and fungal co-infection in individuals with coronavirus: A rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;2:ciaa530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Chakraborty S. Metagenome of SARS Cov2 from a patient in Brazil shows a wide range of bacterial species Lautropia, Prevotella, Haemophilus overshadowing viral reads, which does not even add up to a full genome, explaining false negatives. OSF Preprints; 2020.
  17. 17.↵
    Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. The metagenomics RAST server – a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Ye SH, Siddle KJ, Park DJ, Sabeti PC. Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification. Cell. 2019;178:779–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Leo Lahti, Sudarshan Shetty et al. Tools for microbiome analysis in R., 2017. URL: http://microbiome.github.com/microbiome.
  20. 20.↵
    McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Freeman CM, McCloskey L, Beck JM, Huffnagle GB, et al. Spatial Variation in the Healthy Human Lung Microbiome and the Adapted Island Model of Lung Biogeography. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:821–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    O’Dwyer DN, Dickson RP, Moore BB. The Lung Microbiome, Immunity, and the Pathogenesis of Chronic Lung Disease. J Immunol. 2016;196:4839–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Yildiz H, Sünnetçioglu A, Ekin S, Baran AI, Özgökçe M, Asker S, et al. Delftia acidovorans pneumonia with lung cavities formation. Colomb Med (Cali). 2019;50:215–21.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Patel D, Iqbal AM, Mubarik A, NiraliVassa, RaniaGodil, Mohamad Saad, et al. Delftia acidovorans: A rare cause of septic pulmonary embolism from catheter-related infection: Case report and literature review. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019;27:100835.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Maraki S, Papadakis IS. Rothia mucilaginosa pneumonia: a literature review. Infect Dis (Lond). 2015;47:125–9.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Yun SS, Cho HS, Heo M, Jeong JH, Lee HR, Ju S, et al. Lung abscess by Actinomyces odontolyticus and Parvimonas micra co-infection presenting as acute respiratory failure: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(35):e16911.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Takiguchi Y, Terano T, Hirai A. Lung abscess caused by Actinomyces odontolyticus. Intern Med. 2003;42:723–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Harding C, Hennon S, Feldman M. Uncovering the mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii virulence. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018; 16:91–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.
    Kadioglu A, Weiser J, Paton J, Andrew PW. The role of Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence factors in host respiratory colonization and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;6:288–301.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P. Characterization of Virulence Factors of Staphylococcus aureus: Novel Function of Known Virulence Factors That Are Implicated in Activation of Airway Epithelial Proinflammatory Response. J Pathog. 2011;2011:601905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Adair CG, Gorman SP, Feron BM, Byers LM, Jones DS, Goldsmith CE, et al. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:1072–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Wolcott R, Costerton JW, Raoult D, Cutler SJ. The polymicrobial nature of biofilm infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:107–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Cardeñosa Cendrero JA, Solé-Violán J, Bordes Benítez A, Noguera Catalán J, Arroyo Fernández J, Saavedra Santana P, et al. Role of different routes of tracheal colonization in the development of pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1999;116:462–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.
    Gil-Perotin S, Ramirez P, Marti V, Sahuquillo JM, Gonzalez E, Calleja I, et al. Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator-associated pneumonia response: a state of concept. Crit Care. 2012;16:R93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Vandecandelaere I, Matthijs N, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D, Vosters P, De Bus L, et al. Assessment of microbial diversity in biofilms recovered from endotracheal tubes using culture dependent and independent approaches. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Boisvert AA, Cheng MP, Sheppard DC, Nguyen D. Microbial Biofilms in Pulmonary and Critical Care Diseases. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:1615–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Sanchez CJ Jr, Mende K, Beckius ML, Akers KS, Romano DR, Wenke JC, et al. Biofilm formation by clinical isolates and the implications in chronic infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Mittal R, Sharma S, Chhibber S, Harjai K. Effect of macrophage secretory products on elaboration of virulence factors by planktonic and biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;29:12–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Borriello G, Werner E, Roe F, Kim AM, Ehrlich GD, Stewart PS. Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2659–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Hanke ML, Kielian T. Deciphering mechanisms of staphylococcal biofilm evasion of host immunity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:62.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Hirschfeld J. Dynamic interactions of neutrophils and biofilms. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6:26102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Wiseman GM. The hemolysins of Staphylococcus aureus. Bacteriol Rev. 1975;39(4):317–44.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Schindel C, Zitzer A, Schulte B, Gerhards A, Stanley P, Hughes C, et al. Interaction of Escherichia coli hemolysin with biological membranes. A study using cysteine scanning mutagenesis. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:800–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Ike Y, Hashimoto H, Clewell DB. High incidence of hemolysin production by Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis strains associated with human parenteral infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1524–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Doran KS, Chang JC, Benoit VM, Eckmann L, Nizet V. Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin/cytolysin promotes invasion of human lung epithelial cells and the release of interleukin-8. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:196–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Kadioglu A, Weiser JN, Paton JC, Andrew PW. The role of Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence factors in host respiratory colonization and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:288–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    Calderone RA, Fonzi WA. Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:327–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Deorukhkar SC, Saini S, Mathew S. Virulence Factors Contributing to Pathogenicity of Candida tropicalis and Its Antifungal Susceptibility Profile. Int J Microbiol. 2014;2014:456878.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Hurley BP, McCormick BA. Multiple roles of phospholipase A2 during lung infection and inflammation. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2259–2272.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Lu H, Que Y, Wu X, Guan T, Guo H. Metabolomics Deciphered Metabolic Reprogramming Required for Biofilm Formation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13160.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Smith AW, Roche H, Trombe MC, Briles DE, Håkansson A. Characterization of the dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase from Streptococcus pneumoniae and its role in pneumococcal infection. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44:431–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    Datta V, Myskowski SM, Kwinn LA, Chiem DN, Varki N, Kansal RG, et al. Mutational analysis of the group A streptococcal operon encoding streptolysin S and its virulence role in invasive infection. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:681–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Craig A, Mai J, Cai S, Jeyaseelan S. Neutrophil recruitment to the lungs during bacterial pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2009;77:568–75.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Ghoneim HE, Thomas PG, McCullers JA. Depletion of alveolar macrophages during influenza infection facilitates bacterial superinfections. J Immunol. 2013;191:1250–1259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Liu J, Pang Z, Wang G, Guan X, Fang K, Wang Z, et al. Advanced Role of Neutrophils in Common Respiratory Diseases. J Immunol Res. 2017;6710278.
  56. 56.↵
    Sodhi CP, Nguyen J, Yamaguchi Y, Werts AD, Lu P, Ladd MR, et al. A Dynamic Variation of Pulmonary ACE2 Is Required to Modulate Neutrophilic Inflammation in Response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection in Mice. J Immunol. 2019;203:3000–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    Raval CM, Lee PJ. Heme oxygenase-1 in lung disease. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:1532–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    Su WL, Lin CP, Hang HC, Wu PS, Cheng CF, Chao YC. Desaturation and heme elevation during COVID-19 infection: A potential prognostic factor of heme oxygenase-1. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;S1684-1182:30246-2.
  59. 59.↵
    Wagener FADTG, Pickkers P, Peterson SJ, Immenschuh S, Abraham NG. Targeting the Heme-Heme Oxygenase System to Prevent Severe Complications Following COVID-19 Infections. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(6):540.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    Mumby S, Upton RL, Chen Y, Stanford SJ, Quinlan GJ, Nicholson AG, et al. Lung heme oxygenase-1 is elevated in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1130–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Simoni J, Simoni G, Moeller JF, Tsikouris JP, Wesson DE. Evaluation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-like activity of acellular hemoglobin. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol. 2007;35:191–210.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    Shaver CM, Upchurch CP, Janz DR, Grove BS, Putz ND, Wickersham NE, et al. Cell-free hemoglobin: a novel mediator of acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;310:L532–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    Richard KL, Kelley BR, Johnson JG. Heme Uptake and Utilization by Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:81.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    Dutra FF, Alves LS, Rodrigues D, Fernandez PL, de Oliveira RB, Golenbock DT, et al. Hemolysis-induced lethality involves inflammasome activation by heme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E4110–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Inflammasome activation and regulation: toward a better understanding of complex mechanisms. Cell Discov. 2020; 6:36.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    de Rivero Vaccari JC, Dietrich WD, Keane RW, de Rivero Vaccari JP. The Inflammasome in Times of COVID-19. Front Immunol. 2020;11:583373.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    Gupta R, Shah P, Swiatlo E. Differential gene expression in Streptococcus pneumoniae in response to various iron sources. Microb Pathog. 2009;47:101–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    Kang D, Kirienko NV. Interdependence between iron acquisition and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Microbiol. 2018;56:449–57.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    Hammer ND, Skaar EP. Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus iron acquisition. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:129–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.
    Skaar EP, Humayun M, Bae T, DeBord KL, Schneewind O. Iron-source preference of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Science. 2004;305:1626–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    Ledala N, Zhang B, Seravalli J, Powers R, Somerville GA. Influence of iron and aeration on Staphylococcus aureus growth, metabolism, and transcription. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:2178–89.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    Fourie R, Kuloyo OO, Mochochoko BM, Albertyn J, Pohl CH. Iron at the Centre of Candida albicans Interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:185.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 28, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and potential role in COVID-19 severity in patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and potential role in COVID-19 severity in patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil
Fabíola Marques de Carvalho, Leandro Nascimento Lemos, Luciane Prioli Ciapina, Rennan Garcias Moreira, Alexandra Gerber, Ana Paula C Guimarães, Tatiani Fereguetti, Virgínia Antunes de Andrade Zambelli, Renata Avila, Tailah Bernardo de Almeida, Jheimson da Silva Lima, Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso, Mauro Martins Teixeira, Renan Pedra Souza, Cynthia Chester Cardoso, Renato Santana Aguiar, Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20248501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248501
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and potential role in COVID-19 severity in patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil
Fabíola Marques de Carvalho, Leandro Nascimento Lemos, Luciane Prioli Ciapina, Rennan Garcias Moreira, Alexandra Gerber, Ana Paula C Guimarães, Tatiani Fereguetti, Virgínia Antunes de Andrade Zambelli, Renata Avila, Tailah Bernardo de Almeida, Jheimson da Silva Lima, Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso, Mauro Martins Teixeira, Renan Pedra Souza, Cynthia Chester Cardoso, Renato Santana Aguiar, Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20248501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248501

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)