Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Development of an electronic frailty index for predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement using machine learning

Yiyi Chen, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Tong Liu, Sandeep S Hothi, Ian Chi Kei Wong, View ORCID ProfileQingpeng Zhang, Gary Tse, Yan Wang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248770
Yiyi Chen
1Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, London, UK
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiandong Zhou
2School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharen Lee
3Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tong Liu
4Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandeep S Hothi
5Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
PhD FACC FESC FRCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Chi Kei Wong
6Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingpeng Zhang
2School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qingpeng Zhang
  • For correspondence: qingpeng.zhang{at}cityu.edu.hk gary.tse{at}doctors.org.uk
Gary Tse
3Laboratory of Cardiovascular Physiology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
4Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
7Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
PhD FACC FSCAI FRCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: qingpeng.zhang{at}cityu.edu.hk gary.tse{at}doctors.org.uk
Yan Wang
7Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
MD PhD FACC FSCAI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Electronic frailty indices can be useful surrogate measures of frailty. We assessed the role of machine learning to develop an electronic frailty index, incorporating demographics, baseline comorbidities, healthcare utilization characteristics, electrocardiographic measurements, and laboratory examinations, and used this to predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transaortic valvular replacement (TAVR).

Methods This was a multi-centre retrospective observational study of patients undergoing for TAVR. Significant univariate and multivariate predictors of all-cause mortality were identified using Cox regression. Importance ranking of variables was obtained with a gradient boosting survival tree (GBST) model, a supervised sequential ensemble learning algorithm, and used to build the frailty models. Comparisons were made between multivariate Cox, GBST and random survival forest models.

Results A total of 450 patients (49% females; median age at procedure 82.3 (interquartile range, IQR 79.0-86.0)) were included, of which 22 died during follow-up. A machine learning survival analysis model found that the most important predictors of mortality were APTT, followed by INR, severity of tricuspid regurgitation, cumulative hospital stays, cumulative number of readmissions, creatinine, urate, ALP, and QTc/QT intervals. GBST significantly outperformed random survival forests and multivariate Cox regression (precision: 0.91, recall: 0.89, AUC: 0.93, C-index: 0.96, and KS-index: 0.50) for mortality prediction.

Conclusions An electronic frailty index incorporating multi-domain data can efficiently predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. A machine learning survival learning model significantly improves the risk prediction performance of the frailty models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong - New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The dataset has already been deposited in a repository and is accessible via: https://zenodo.org/record/4387098

https://zenodo.org/record/4387098

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 28, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of an electronic frailty index for predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement using machine learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Development of an electronic frailty index for predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement using machine learning
Yiyi Chen, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Tong Liu, Sandeep S Hothi, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Qingpeng Zhang, Gary Tse, Yan Wang
medRxiv 2020.12.23.20248770; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248770
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Development of an electronic frailty index for predicting mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement using machine learning
Yiyi Chen, Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Tong Liu, Sandeep S Hothi, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Qingpeng Zhang, Gary Tse, Yan Wang
medRxiv 2020.12.23.20248770; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.20248770

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)