Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

An analysis of patients’ perspectives on qualitative olfactory dysfunction using social media

View ORCID ProfileJane K. Parker, Christine E. Kelly, Barry Smith, View ORCID ProfileClaire Hopkins, View ORCID ProfileSimon B. Gane
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249029
Jane K. Parker
1Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jane K. Parker
Christine E. Kelly
2AbScent, Andover, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry Smith
3Centre for the Study of the Senses, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire Hopkins
4Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claire Hopkins
Simon B. Gane
5Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat and Eastman Dental Hospital, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Simon B. Gane
  • For correspondence: simongane{at}nhs.net
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249029
History 
  • January 4, 2021.
Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Jane K. Parker1,
  2. Christine E. Kelly2,
  3. Barry Smith3,
  4. Claire Hopkins4 and
  5. Simon B. Gane5,*
  1. 1Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
  2. 2AbScent, Andover, Hampshire, United Kingdom
  3. 3Centre for the Study of the Senses, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  4. 4Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
  5. 5Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat and Eastman Dental Hospital, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  1. ↵*CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Mr Simon Gane, Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat and Eastman Dental Hospitals, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Email: simongane{at}nhs.net. Tel 02034565197
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 04, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An analysis of patients’ perspectives on qualitative olfactory dysfunction using social media
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An analysis of patients’ perspectives on qualitative olfactory dysfunction using social media
Jane K. Parker, Christine E. Kelly, Barry Smith, Claire Hopkins, Simon B. Gane
medRxiv 2020.12.30.20249029; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249029
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
An analysis of patients’ perspectives on qualitative olfactory dysfunction using social media
Jane K. Parker, Christine E. Kelly, Barry Smith, Claire Hopkins, Simon B. Gane
medRxiv 2020.12.30.20249029; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)