Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Vinod K. Gupta, Kevin Y. Cunningham, Utpal Bakshi, Benjamin Hur, Harvey Huang, Kenneth J. Warrington, Veena Taneja, Elena Myasoedova, John M. Davis III, View ORCID ProfileJaeyun Sung
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249040
Vinod K. Gupta
1Microbiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
2Division of Surgery Research, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Y. Cunningham
3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Utpal Bakshi
1Microbiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
2Division of Surgery Research, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Hur
1Microbiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
2Division of Surgery Research, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harvey Huang
4Mayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth J. Warrington
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veena Taneja
6Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Myasoedova
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
7Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Davis III
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaeyun Sung
1Microbiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
2Division of Surgery Research, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jaeyun Sung
  • For correspondence: Sung.Jaeyun{at}mayo.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Rapid advances in the past decade have shown that dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is a key hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Yet, the relationship between gut microbiome and clinical improvement in RA disease activity remains unclear. In this study, we explored the gut microbiome of patients with RA to identify features that are associated with, as well as predictive of, minimum clinically important improvement (MCII) in disease activity.

Methods Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing was performed on 64 stool samples, which were collected from 32 patients with RA at two separate time-points. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) of each patient was measured at both time-points to assess achievement of MCII; depending on this clinical status, patients were distinguished into two groups. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify microbial taxa and biochemical pathways associated with MCII while controlling for potentially confounding factors. Lastly, a deep-learning neural network was trained upon gut microbiome, clinical, and demographic data at baseline to classify patients according to MCII status, thereby enabling the prediction of whether a patient will achieve MCII at follow-up.

Results We determined that MCII status can explain a significant proportion of the overall compositional variance in the gut microbiome (R2 = 3.8%, P = 0.005, PERMANOVA). Additionally, by looking at patients’ baseline gut microbiome profiles, we observed significantly different microbiome traits between patients who eventually showed MCII and those who did not. Taxonomic features include alpha- and beta-diversity measures, as well as several microbial taxa, such as Coprococcus, Bilophila sp. 4_1_30, and Ruminococcus sp. Functional profiling identified thirteen biochemical pathways, most of which were involved in the biosynthesis of L-arginine and L-methionine, to be differentially abundant between the MCII patient groups. In addition to these observations at baseline, we found microbiome features that vary differently in fold-change (from baseline to follow-up) between the two patient groups. These results could suggest that, depending on the clinical course, gut microbiomes not only start at different ecological states, but also are on separate trajectories. Finally, the neural network proved to be highly effective in predicting which patient will achieve MCII (balanced accuracy = 90.0%), demonstrating potential clinical utility of gut microbiome profiles.

Conclusions Our findings confirm the presence of taxonomic and functional signatures of the gut microbiome associated with MCII in RA patients. Ultimately, the gut microbiome may aid in the development of non-invasive tools for predicting future prognosis in RA.

Trial registration N/A

Competing Interest Statement

J.M.D. has a research grant from Pfizer. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine (to V.K.G., K.C., U.B., B.H., and J.S.), and Mark E. and Mary A. Davis to Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine (J.M.D., J.S.).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (no. 14-000616).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Sequencing data for stool metagenomes used in this study have been deposited at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) data repository (BioProject number PRJNA598446 and PRJNA687957) and can be downloaded without any restrictions. The deposited sequences include .fastq files for 64 stool metagenomes collected from 32 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Human reads were identified and removed prior to data upload.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 04, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Vinod K. Gupta, Kevin Y. Cunningham, Utpal Bakshi, Benjamin Hur, Harvey Huang, Kenneth J. Warrington, Veena Taneja, Elena Myasoedova, John M. Davis III, Jaeyun Sung
medRxiv 2020.12.30.20249040; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249040
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Vinod K. Gupta, Kevin Y. Cunningham, Utpal Bakshi, Benjamin Hur, Harvey Huang, Kenneth J. Warrington, Veena Taneja, Elena Myasoedova, John M. Davis III, Jaeyun Sung
medRxiv 2020.12.30.20249040; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.30.20249040

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rheumatology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)