ABSTRACT
Objectives Canadians want to live and die in their home communities. Unfortunately, Canada has the highest proportion of deaths in acute care facilities as compared to other developed nations. This study aims to identify the essential components required to best support patients and families with palliative care needs in their communities to inform system changes and empower family physicians (FPs) in providing community-based palliative care for patients.
Design Appreciative Inquiry (AI) methodology with individual interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed iteratively for emerging themes and used to develop “possibility statements” to frame discussion in subsequent focus groups. A conceptual framework emerged to describe the “destiny” state as per AI methods.
Setting Family physicians, palliative home care providers, patients and bereaved caregivers were recruited in the urban and surrounding rural health authority zones of Calgary, Canada.
Participants 9 females and 9 males FPs (range of practice years 2-42) in interviews; 8 bereaved caregivers, 1 patient, 26 Palliative Home Care team members in focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were recorded digitally and transcribed with consent.
Results The identified themes that transcended all three groups created the foundation for the conceptual framework. Enhanced communication and fostering team relationships between all care providers with the focus on the patient and caregivers was the cornerstone concept. The family physician/patient relationship must be protected and encouraged by all care providers, while more system flexibility is needed to respond more effectively to patients. These concepts must exist in the context that patients and caregivers need more education regarding the benefits of palliative care, while increasing public discourse about mortality.
Conclusions Key areas were identified for how the patient’s team can work together effectively to improve the patient and caregiver palliative care journey in the community with the cornerstone element of building on the trusting FP-patient longitudinal relationship.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study uses Appreciative Inquiry qualitative methods to identify the essential components required to best support patients and families with palliative care needs in their communities.
Multiple perspectives recruited including: community-based family physicians, palliative home care clinicians, patients, and bereaved caregivers.
Analysis was focused on the family physicians’ interviews to derive “possibility statements” and used to frame the focus groups with the other groups of participants.
Generalisability may be limited due to the lack of diversity in participants recruited for the patients and bereaved caregivers in terms of ethnicity, age, and gender.
Patients and caregivers may have been reluctant to volunteer for this study as it involved discussing palliative care.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Janus Research Grant from the Foundation for Advancing Family Medicine of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and a Grant from Alberta Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Health Research Ethics Board Approval: University of Calgary: REB17-1230
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
rnspice{at}ucalgary.ca
Ayn.Sinnarajah{at}albertahealthservices.ca
Data Availability
Data is stored locally on a secure harddrive and can be provided at request.
