Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Dynamic Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR status on Chest Radiographs using Deep Learning Enabled Radiogenomics

View ORCID ProfileWan Hang Keith Chiu, Dmytro Poplavskiy, Sailong Zhang, Philip Leong Ho Yu, Michael D. Kuo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.10.21249370
Wan Hang Keith Chiu
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
2Medical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Program, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
MBChB, FRCR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wan Hang Keith Chiu
Dmytro Poplavskiy
3Ensemblehealth.ai, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sailong Zhang
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Leong Ho Yu
4Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong SAR
BSc, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Kuo
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
2Medical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Program, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
3Ensemblehealth.ai, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mikedkuo{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but requires specialized equipment and reagents and suffers from long turnaround times. While valuable, chest imaging currently only detects COVID-19 pneumonia, but if it can predict actual RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status is unknown. Radiogenomics may provide an effective and accurate RT-PCR-based surrogate. We describe a deep learning radiogenomics (DLR) model (RadGen) that predicts a patient's RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status solely from their frontal chest radiograph (CXR).

Brief Introduction

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection1, but requires specialized equipment and reagents and suffers from long turnaround times. While valuable, chest imaging currently only detects COVID-19 pneumonia, but if it can predict actual RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status is unknown. Radiogenomics may provide an effective and accurate RT-PCR-based surrogate2. We describe a deep learning radiogenomics (DLR) model (RadGen) that predicts a patient’s RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status solely from their frontal chest radiograph (CXR).

Methods

The RadGen architecture, based on SE-ResNeXt-50-32×4d, was pretrained on ImageNet and ChestX-ray14 and 28,430 CXR from PadChest, and Kaggle before fine-tuned using CXR from a multinational cohort of RT-PCR tested patients from Hong Kong, GITHUB, SIRM and BIMCV (6,326 images)3-5. The model first predicted and selected only frontal CXR images, then predicted a segmentation mask of the cropped lung areas to reduce model fitting to unrelated parts of the image before using the segmented area as input for the RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 binary classification task. The final prediction score was an ensemble consisting of the average of 4 models.

Results

RadGen achieved a mean Area Under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.959 (95%CI 0.955,0.962), sensitivity of 80.8% (3007/3723) and specificity 95.1% (16206/17033) using a pre-determined 0.4 cutpoint. It distinguishes pre-COVID-19, laboratory confirmed pneumonia from SARS2-CoV-2 cases with a specificity of 89.3% (225/252), and a specificity of 96.4% (106/110) on excluding SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients pre-COVID-19 CXR who later became RT-PCR positive.

The RT-PCR-tested cohort in Hong Kong consisted of 314 positive and 2,471 negative patients from 4 hospitals3. The SARS-CoV-2 positive patients had a median of 9 (range 3-24) RT-PCR tests and 3 corresponding (range 1-8) CXR during their hospitalization (range 3-112 days); 90.8% (285/314) had mild/asymptomatic disease. The sensitivity and specificity of RadGen for predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection on initial presenting CXR was 79.5% (225/283) and 85.2% (2105/2471).

RadGen time course analysis by autocorrelation function (ACF) plot, which describes how well RadGen predicts a patient’s RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status over the course of their entire SARS-CoV-2 infection period, was performed revealing a peak lag at 2 days for radiogenomic signature manifestation on CXR after initial RT-PCR diagnosis. The per-film false negative rate was 10.0% (26/261) and 9.3% (21/225) within and after 7 days of the first RT-PCR positive test with a false positive rate of 68.1% (32/47) and 11.3% (45/397) within and after one week of achieving RT-PCR confirmed viral clearance (Fig 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 1.

Serial CXR of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive male patient in his 40s. RadGen correctly predicted the RT-PCR status of the patient on CXR prior to COVID19 (pre-COVID-19), at initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis (Day 0), during his infection period (Day 8) and upon achieving RT-PCR confirmed viral clearance (Day 12).

Comment

Leveraging a DLR strategy and a rich body of training datasets including Asian and Western countries (reflecting a diverse set of clinical containment protocols), a wide spectrum of clinical presentations including mild and asymptomatic disease, and a prospectively collected multi-timepoint RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive patient cohort, we generated a DLR model capable of predicting a patient’s RT-PCR status from CXR.

Interestingly, we also show that RadGen can non-invasively ‘track’ RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 status over the course of their infection, from diagnosis to viral clearance. A time-delayed correlation between RadGen and RT-PCR seen at the time of initial RT-PCR positivity and at the time of achieving RT-PCR viral clearance was observed. This is not unexpected as SARS-CoV-2 genomic dosage changes have been shown to take time to accumulate and be phenotypically reflected on a cellular, organ and systems level. Further, it is known that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can persist long after active infectivity and symptom resolution6; thus, that RadGen performs this well, particularly in a mild/asymptomatic cohort, is notable.

In conclusion, the feasibility for DLR models to dynamically track RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 changes on an individual level significantly expands the scope of radiogenomics.

Data Availability

Code and models used in this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and under a collaboration agreement.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Kuo MD, Jamshidi N. Behind the Numbers: Decoding Molecular Phenotypes with Radiogenomics—Guiding Principles and Technical Considerations. Radiology. 2014;270(2):320–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Segal E, Sirlin CB, Ooi C, Adler AS, Gollub J, Chen X, et al. Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25(6):675–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Chiu WHK, Vardhanabhuti V, Poplavskiy D, Yu PLH, D.R, Yap AYH, et al. Detection of COVID-19 Using Deep Learning Algorithms on Chest Radiographs. Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 2020;Publish Ahead of Print.
  4. 4.
    Iglesia la de Vayá M, Saborit JM, Montell JA, Pertusa A, Bustos A, Cazorla M, et al. BIMCV COVID-19+: a large annotated dataset of RX and CT images from COVID-19 patients2020 June 01, 2020:[arXiv:2006.01174 p.]. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200601174I.
  5. 5.↵
    Bustos A, Pertusa A, Salinas J-M, de la Iglesia-Vayá M. PadChest: A large chest x- ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reports. arXiv e-prints [Internet]. 2019 January 01, 2019:[arXiv:1901.07441 p.]. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190107441B.
  6. 6.↵
    Cevik M, Kuppalli K, Kindrachuk J, Peiris M. Virology, transmission, and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Bmj. 2020.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 15, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR status on Chest Radiographs using Deep Learning Enabled Radiogenomics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dynamic Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR status on Chest Radiographs using Deep Learning Enabled Radiogenomics
Wan Hang Keith Chiu, Dmytro Poplavskiy, Sailong Zhang, Philip Leong Ho Yu, Michael D. Kuo
medRxiv 2021.01.10.21249370; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.10.21249370
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Dynamic Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR status on Chest Radiographs using Deep Learning Enabled Radiogenomics
Wan Hang Keith Chiu, Dmytro Poplavskiy, Sailong Zhang, Philip Leong Ho Yu, Michael D. Kuo
medRxiv 2021.01.10.21249370; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.10.21249370

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)