Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

X-ray Dark-Field Chest Imaging can Detect and Quantify Emphy-sema in COPD Patients

Konstantin Willer, Alexander Fingerle, Wolfgang Noichl, Fabio De Marco, Manuela Frank, Theresa Urban, Rafael Schick, Alex Gustschin, Bernhard Gleich, Julia Herzen, Thomas Koehler, Andre Yaroshenko, Thomas Pralow, Gregor Zimmermann, Bernhard Renger, Andreas Sauter, Daniela Pfeiffer, Marcus Makowski, Ernst Rummeny, Philippe Grenier, Franz Pfeiffer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249798
Konstantin Willer
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: konstantin.willer{at}ph.tum.de
Alexander Fingerle
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Noichl
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio De Marco
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuela Frank
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa Urban
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rafael Schick
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Gustschin
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Gleich
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Herzen
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Koehler
3Philips Research Hamburg, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Yaroshenko
4Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH Hamburg, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Pralow
4Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH Hamburg, Germany
Dipllng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregor Zimmermann
5Department of Medicine I, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Renger
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
DiplPhys
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Sauter
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Pfeiffer
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Makowski
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ernst Rummeny
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Grenier
6Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Hôpital Foch Suresnes, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franz Pfeiffer
1Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics & Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
7Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

Background Diseases of the respiratory system are leading global causes of chronic morbidity and mortality. While advanced medical imaging technologies of today deliver detailed diagnostic information, a low-dose, fast, and inexpensive option for early detection and/or follow-ups is still lacking. Here, we report on the first human application of a novel modality, namely X-ray dark-field chest imaging, which might fill this gap. Enabling the assessment of microstructural changes in lung parenchyma, this technique presents a more sensitive alternative to conventional chest X-rays, and yet requires only a fraction of the dose applied in computed tomography (CT).

Methods For this first clinical evaluation, we have built a novel dark-field chest X-ray system, which is also capable of simultaneously acquiring a conventional thorax radiograph (7 seconds, 0·035 mSv effective dose). Representing a major medical condition, we selected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as study subject to obtain a first impression of potential diagnostic benefits relevant to humans. For a collective of 77 patients with different disease stages, X-ray dark-field- and CT-images were acquired and visually assessed by 5 readers. In addition, pulmonary function tests were performed for every patient. The individual data sets were evaluated in a statistical work-up using correlation testing, rank-based analysis of variance, and pair-wise post-hoc comparison.

Findings Compared to CT-based parameters (quantitative emphysema: ρ=–0·27, p=0·0893 and visual emphysema: ρ=–0·45, p=0·0028), the dark-field signal (ρ=0·62, p<0·0001) yields a stronger correlation with diffusion capacity in the evaluated collective. Emphysema assessment based on dark-field chest X-ray features yields consistent conclusions with findings from visual CT image interpretation and shows improved diagnostic performance in comparison to conventional clinical tests characterizing emphysema.

Interpretation X-ray dark-field chest imaging allows the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema as it provides relevant information representing the structural condition of lung parenchyma. Significant diagnostic benefits are also expected for other lung disorders.

Funding European Research Council, Royal Philips, Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility.

Evidence before this study With a rising number of examinations in the last decades, X-rays play an indispensable role in clinical routine. Contrast formation in medical X-ray imaging such as radiography, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography is based on attenuation, which generally benefits from large differences in atomic number and/or mass density between involved materials. If these conditions are not prevalent, or the resolution of the imaging system is not sufficient, diagnostic capabilities are limited. However, attenuation is not the only physical effect X-rays are subjected to when penetrating matter. Variations in an object’s electron density lead to refraction and coherent small-angle scattering of incident X-rays. Phase-sensitive imaging techniques can detect these wave-optical phenomena, yielding additional object information. The dark-field signal, being a function of small-angle scattering, can provide structural information on the micron scale, generally below the resolution limit of the imaging system. Due to their very stringent requirements to X-ray source coherence, these techniques were originally limited to large-scale synchrotron facilities. The proposal of a three-grating interferometer in 2006, however, enabled the use of low-brilliance sources for X-ray phase-contrast imaging and thereby paved the way into the clinics. Such an apparatus elegantly allows the simultaneous acquisition of the conventional attenuation, differential phase-contrast, and novel dark-field signals. In a compact table-top system suitable for investigating murine disease models, numerous studies on pulmonary disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary fibrosis, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated lung injury, lung cancer, and pneumonia have been conducted and demonstrated a broad diagnostic value of the dark-field modality in particular. Adapting the system to enable imaging of the human body is a technical challenge due to limitations of the micrometer-fine, high aspect ratio grating structures in terms of fabricable size and performance at clinically relevant X-ray energies. The first evidences that these limitations are manageable were delivered in 2017 and 2018 by in-vivo porcine and human cadaver studies with an experimental prototype system.

Added value of this study With this work we present the first X-ray dark-field chest images of human subjects in-vivo and demonstrate the method’s feasibility in a clinical surrounding. To enable this study, we have conceived, constructed, and commissioned a custom-built first demonstrator system suitable for patient use. This includes satisfying clinical demands regarding safety, usability, acquisition time, radiation dose, field of view, and image quality. This study marks the transition from investigating artificially induced disease models to evaluating the modality’s actual diagnostic performance in patients.

Implications of all available evidence Our findings indicate that X-ray dark-field radiography provides image-type information of the lungs’ underlying microstructure in humans. In view of the strong link between alveolar structure and the functional condition of the lung, this capability is highly relevant for respiratory medicine and might help to establish a better understanding of pulmonary disorders. With regard to early detection of COPD, which is generally accompanied by structural impairments of the lung, this novel technique might support resolving the prevalent under-diagnosis reported in literature. With an effective dose significantly lower (about a factor of hundred) compared to thorax computed tomography, dark-field radiography could be used as broadly deployed screening tool.

Competing Interest Statement

T.K., A.Y., and T.P. are employees of Royal Philips. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical Trial

Not applicable. The presented study is an evaluation of a novel imaging modality and not a pharmaceutical study. For this reason, the study was not registered.

Funding Statement

Financial support was given through the European Research Council (ERC, H2020, AdG 695045) and Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH. This work was carried out with the support of the Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF, www.kit.edu/knmf), a Helmholtz Research Infrastructure at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Three of the authors are employees of Royal Philips, one of the funding sources. With all of them having technical background, their contribution was of methodic nature only. Apart from that none of the funding sources were involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethikkommission der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen Ismaninger Strasse 22 81675 Muenchen

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data required to evaluate the conclusions of our study are presented in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 15, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
X-ray Dark-Field Chest Imaging can Detect and Quantify Emphy-sema in COPD Patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
X-ray Dark-Field Chest Imaging can Detect and Quantify Emphy-sema in COPD Patients
Konstantin Willer, Alexander Fingerle, Wolfgang Noichl, Fabio De Marco, Manuela Frank, Theresa Urban, Rafael Schick, Alex Gustschin, Bernhard Gleich, Julia Herzen, Thomas Koehler, Andre Yaroshenko, Thomas Pralow, Gregor Zimmermann, Bernhard Renger, Andreas Sauter, Daniela Pfeiffer, Marcus Makowski, Ernst Rummeny, Philippe Grenier, Franz Pfeiffer
medRxiv 2021.01.15.21249798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249798
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
X-ray Dark-Field Chest Imaging can Detect and Quantify Emphy-sema in COPD Patients
Konstantin Willer, Alexander Fingerle, Wolfgang Noichl, Fabio De Marco, Manuela Frank, Theresa Urban, Rafael Schick, Alex Gustschin, Bernhard Gleich, Julia Herzen, Thomas Koehler, Andre Yaroshenko, Thomas Pralow, Gregor Zimmermann, Bernhard Renger, Andreas Sauter, Daniela Pfeiffer, Marcus Makowski, Ernst Rummeny, Philippe Grenier, Franz Pfeiffer
medRxiv 2021.01.15.21249798; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.15.21249798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)