Abstract
Importance Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists regulate blood glucose and are commonly used to treat Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Recent work has shown that treatment with the novel GLP-1R agonist, NLY01, decreased retinal neuroinflammation and glial activation to rescue retinal ganglion cells in an animal model of glaucoma.
Objective In this study, we used an insurance claims database to examine whether GLP-1R agonist exposure impacts glaucoma risk.
Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort of adult patients who initiated a new GLP-1R agonist (i.e., exenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, or lixisenatide) was 1:3 age, gender, race, active diabetes medication classes, and year of index date matched to a cohort of patients who initiated a different class of oral diabetic medication during their time in the database. Exclusion occurred for <2 years in the database, age <18 years old, no visit to an eyecare provider prior to the index date, a prior diagnosis of glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or ocular hypertension, or prior glaucoma medication, procedure, or surgery. Diabetes severity was assessed using hemoglobin A1c and the Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI), a validated metric based on six categories of diabetic complications. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used within a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model to test the association between GLP-1R agonist exposure and the primary outcome. IPTW was derived from a propensity score model based on the DCSI, HbA1c, demographic factors and other systemic health conditions.
Exposure Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist.
Main Outcomes and Measures New diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or low tension glaucoma.
Results Cohorts were comprised of 1,961 new users of GLP-1R agonists matched to 4,371 unexposed controls. After IPTW, age was the only covariate imbalanced (SMD >0.1) between cohorts. Ten new diagnoses of glaucoma (0.51%) were present in the GLP-1R agonist cohort compared to 58 (1.33%) in the unexposed controls. After adjustment, GLP-1R exposure conferred a reduced hazard of 0.54 (95%CI: 0.35-0.85, P =0.007), suggesting that GLP-1R agonists reduce the risk for glaucoma.
Conclusions and Relevance GLP-1R agonist use was associated with a statistically significant hazard reduction for a new glaucoma diagnosis. Our findings support further investigations into the use of GLP-1R agonists in glaucoma prevention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
National Institutes of Health-National Eye Institute K23 Award (K23EY025729), National Institutes of Health-National Eye Institute K12 Award (K12EY015398; PI: Maureen Maguire), National Institutes of Health-National Eye Institute K08 Award (K08EY029765), National Institutes of Health-National Eye Institute Vision Training Grant (T32EY007035; PI: Diego Contreras), National Institutes of Health-National Eye Institute F30 Award (F30EY032339), and University of Pennsylvania Core Grant for Vision Research (P30EYEY001583). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Additional funding was provided by Research to Prevent Blindness and the Paul and Evanina Mackall Foundation. Funding from each of the above sources was received in the form of block research grants to the Scheie Eye Institute or University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. None of the funding organizations had any role in the design or conduct of the study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Exempt - University of Pennsylvania IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available upon reasonable request.
