Abstract
Objective Off-label drug use seems to be integral to palliative care pharmacotherapy. Balancing potential risks and benefits in the context of limited therapeutic options is challenging. To provide specific support for clinicians in dealing with off-label use, it is essential to understand off-label use in everyday clinical practice.
The aim of this pilot study was to quantify and describe off-label use in a palliative care unit.
Methods Retrospective chart review of all adult patients treated on a palliative care unit in 10/2017. All data on drug use e.g. indication, dose, route of administration were extracted and matched with the prescribing information. Identified off-label use was subsequently compared with recommendations in the relevant literature. The main outcome measure was frequency and type of off-label drug use.
Results 2,352 drug application days (d) and 93 drugs were identified for 28 patients. Of all drugs, 47 (51%) were used off-label at least once. Most off-label uses concerned indication (57%), followed by mode of administration. In drugs highly relevant to palliative care the rate of off-label use was as high as 67%. The extent to which off-label therapy was supported by literature was very variable and ranged from 0 to 88%.
Conclusions This single-unit data confirms the high prevalence of off-label use in palliative medicine and demonstrates that off-label use in palliative care is very multifaceted. The data presented allows for a more precise characterization of various aspects of off-label use in order to derive concrete further measures for research and clinical practice.
What is already known on this subject
Off-label drug use is likely to be common in palliative care, but detailed data is very limited
Off-label drug use is a potential threat for patient safety
Physicians state to make therapeutic decisions based on their own experience, due to a lack of available evidence and lack of support in assessment
What this study adds
off-label use in palliative care is multifaceted
the mode of administration (e.g. combination with other drugs in a syringe driver) is beside indication a common reasons for off label use
the proportion of off-label use without sound evidence is high.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
no external funding received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Ethics Committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich granted ethical approval for this study (19-445).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data referred to in the manuscript is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
