Abstract
Background Previous qualitative research has described that past misdiagnosis experiences may reduce patients’ own and their families’ trust in healthcare.
Objective To quantify the associations between patients’ or family members’ misdiagnosis experiences and the former’s trust in their current physicians.
Design A cross-sectional online survey.
Participants Adult Japanese people with non-communicable diseases (cancer, diabetes, depression, heart disease, and connective tissue disease), recruited using a web-based panel survey.
Main Measures The misdiagnosis experiences of patients and their family members were measured as exposures. The former’s trust in their current physicians was measured using the Japanese version of the 11-item Trust in Physicians Scale modified by Thom, which was translated and validated by us for this study.
Key Results A total of 661 patients with a mean age of 62.7 years were analyzed. Overall, 23.2% had a history of misdiagnosis and 20.4% had a family member who had been misdiagnosed. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) was 0.91. The factor analysis suggested unidimensionality with all 11 loadings being higher than 0.40. In a multivariable-adjusted general linear model, patients’ and family members’ misdiagnosis experiences were associated with lower confidence in their current physicians (mean difference −4.30, 95%CI −8.12 to −0.49 and −3.20, 95%CI −6.34 to −0.05, respectively). An additive effect was suggested for the associations of patients’ and family’s experience of misdiagnosis on trust (P for interaction = 0.494).
Conclusions The individuals’ and family members’ misdiagnosis experiences were associated with reduced trust in their current physicians. Interventions specifically targeting misdiagnosed patients are needed to restore patients’ confidence in their current physicians.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number: JP 19KT0021).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board of Kansai University
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
