Abstract
Introduction Identifying individual and neighborhood-level factors associated with less improvement or worsening cardiometabolic measures in participants of clinic-based interventions may help identify candidates for supplementary community-based interventions.
Methods Study design: Secondary data analysis of data from care coordination program cohort, Leveraging Information Technology to Guide High Tech, High Touch Care (LIGHT2). Participants: Medicare, Medicaid, or dual-eligible adults from the University of Missouri Health System enrolled in LIGHT2. Intervention: Nurse-led care coordination in ten primary care clinics. Outcomes: Hemoglobin A1C, low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and blood pressure. Multivariable generalized linear regression models assessed changes in outcomes after adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors, neighborhood-level factors, and driving time to primary care clinics.
Results 6378 participants had pre-and post-intervention cardiometabolic measures reported (61% women, 86.3% White, non-Hispanic ethnicity, mean age 62.7 [SD, 18.5] years). In adjusted models, pre-intervention measures and female gender were associated with worsening of all cardiometabolic measures. Women’s LDL-cholesterol worsened compared to men irrespective of pre-intervention levels (β 7.87, 95% CI 5.24 to 10.5, p<.001). Women with hemoglobin A1C> 6.8% had worsening hemoglobin A1C compared to men (main effect β −1.28, 95% CI −1.95 to −0.61, p<.001; interaction effect β 0.19, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.28, p<.001). Women with systolic blood pressure >121 mm of Hg had worsening diastolic blood pressure compared to men (main effect β −5.42, 95% CI −9.8 to 0.098, p = 0.016; interaction effect β 0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.078, p = 0.009). Adding neighborhood-level factors or driving time to primary care clinics did not improve the overall fit of the models.
Conclusions In a solely clinic-based care coordination program, increasing baseline cardiometabolic measures and female gender were associated with worsening cardiometabolic outcomes. Further research to understand the causes of these associations may help tailor clinic-community-linked interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SJP was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number KL2 TR002346. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This publication was made possible by Grant Number 1C1CMS331001−01−00 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (JCP). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Missouri institutional review board determined the LIGHT2 program to be a quality improvement activity not requiring institutional review board review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
