Abstract
Background Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common condition which significantly impacts the quality of life and wellbeing of many women.
Laparoscopy with histopathology is recommended for investigation of pelvic pain and identification of endometriosis with concurrent removal. Never-the-less, the association between endometriosis and pelvic pain is challenging, with endometriosis identified in only 30-50% of women with pain.
Aims To explore the predictors for undergoing surgery, for identifying endometriosis and endometriosis severity in a cohort of women with CPP.
Materials and Methods This study forms part of the Persistent Pelvic Pain project, a prospective observational cohort study (ANZCTR:ACTRN12616000150448). Women referred to a public gynaecology clinic with pain were randomised to one of 2 gynaecology units for routine care and followed for 36-months with 6-monthly surveys assessing demographics, medical history, quality of life, and pain symptoms measured on a Likert scale. Operative notes were reviewed, and endometriosis staged.
Results Of 471 women recruited, 102 women underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy, of whom 52 had endometriosis (n=37 stage I-II; n=15 stage III-IV). Gynaecology unit, pelvic pain intensity and lower parity were all predictors of surgery (Odds ratio (OR) 0.342; 95%CI 0.209-0.561; OR 1.303; 95%CI: 1.079-1.573; OR 0.767; 95%CI: 0.620-0.949 respectively). There were no predictors identified for endometriosis diagnosis and the only predictor of severity was increasing age (OR 1.155; 95%CI: 1.047-1.310).
Conclusions Pain intensity and gynaecology unit were key predictors of undergoing laparoscopy, however, pain severity did not predict endometriosis diagnosis or staging. These findings indicate the need to review current frameworks guiding practice towards surgery for pelvic pain.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ANZCTR:ACTRN12616000150448
Funding Statement
We acknowledge the financial support from the Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation, The Pelvic Pain Foundation Australia (https://www.pelvicpain.org.au) and the Mercy Hospital Victoria Limited Small Research Grants. None of the authors hold any conflict of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Mercy Health Human Research and Ethics Committee - HREC R14-31
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
None of the authors hold any conflict of interest.
Data Availability
The datasets generated for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
