Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurological disorder with complicated and disabling motor and non-motor symptoms. The complexity of PD pathology is amplified further due to its dependency on patient diaries and the neurologist’s subjective assessment of clinical scales. This challenge can be addressed by the advances in mobile technology, which can enable objective, accurate, and continuous patient monitoring. Indeed, a significant amount of recent work explores new cost-effective and subjective assessment methods of PD symptoms. For example, smart technologies, such as wearable sensors, have been used to analyze a PD patients’ symptoms to assess their disease progression and even to detect signs in their nascent stage for early diagnosis of PD.
This review focuses on the use of modern wearable and mobile equipment for PD applications in the last decade. Four significant fields of research were identified: Assistance to Diagnosis, Prognosis or Monitoring of Symptoms and their Severity, Predicting Response to Treatment, and Assistance to Therapy or Rehabilitation. This study starts with 31,940 articles published between January 2008 and December 2019 in the following four databases: Pubmed Central, Science Direct, IEEE Xplore and MDPI. A total of 976 papers are manually investigated and included in this review after removing unrelated articles, duplicate entries, publications in languages other than English, and other articles that did not fulfill the selection criteria. Our analysis shows that the numbers of published papers every year has increased at a constant rate from 2008 to 2015, while the rate of increase has significantly grown from 2016 to 2019. Majority of the papers (62%) were published in the last four years, and 21% papers in just 2019. In terms of the symptoms, gait and tremor are two major ones that researchers have focused on. The trend shows the growing interest in assessing Parkinson’s Disease with wearable devices in the last decade, particularly in the last 4 years. Our automated script makes the review easily reproducible for publications published in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is a systematic survey paper.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by NSF CAREER award CNS-1651624.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a systematic review paper.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The details of all the evaluated papers are listed in the publicly shared table made available at https://bit.ly/3rcjJgZ
