ABSTRACT
Background Digital health applications can improve quality and effectiveness of healthcare, by offering a number of tools to patients, professionals, and the healthcare system. Introduction of new technologies is not without risk, and digital health applications are often considered a medical device. Assuring their safe operation requires, amongst others, clinical validation, which needs large datasets to test their application in realistic clinical scenarios. Access to such datasets is challenging, due to concerns about patient privacy. Development of synthetic datasets, which will be sufficiently realistic to test digital applications, is seen as a potential alternative, enabling their deployment.
Objective The aim of work was to develop a method for the generation of realistic synthetic datasets, statistically equivalent to real clinical datasets, and demonstrate that Generative Adversarial Network based approach is fit for purpose.
Method A generative adversarial network was implemented and trained, in a series of six experiments, using numerical and categorical variables from three clinically relevant datasets, including ICD-9 and laboratory codes from the MIMIC III dataset. A number of contextual steps provided the success criteria for the synthetic dataset.
Results The approach created a synthetic dataset that exhibits very similar statistical characteristics with the real dataset. Pairwise association of variables is very similar. A high degree of Jaccard similarity and a successful K-S test further support this.
Conclusions The proof of concept of generating realistic synthetic datasets was successful, with the approach showing promise for further work.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not applicable. Study was a technology demonstrator using public data.
Funding Statement
This work led by MHRA and in collaboration with NHS Digital, was funded by the Regulators Pioneer Fund, launched by The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), and HDR UK, a research collaboration funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome Trust. The authors have not received other 3rd party funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable. Study was a technology demonstrator using publically available data.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Dataset used available at MIMIC website. Data generated cannot be shared as they are part of ongoing further work in the involved organizations.
