Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Recent changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers

Emily C. O’Brien, Haolin Xu, Lauren W. Cohen, Elizabeth A. Shenkman, Russell L. Rothman, Christopher B. Forrest, Adrian F. Hernandez
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.21252457
Emily C. O’Brien
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
2Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: emily.obrien{at}duke.edu
Haolin Xu
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren W. Cohen
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Shenkman
3Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell L. Rothman
4Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
MD, MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher B. Forrest
5Applied Clinical Research Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrian F. Hernandez
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
6Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
MD, MHS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Early COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates suggest that up to one-third of HCWs may be vaccine-hesitant. However, it is unclear whether hesitancy among HCWs has improved with time and if there are temporal changes whether these differ by healthcare worker role.

Methods In October 2020, a brief survey was sent to all participants in the Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO) Registry with a yes/no question regarding vaccination under emergency use authorization (EUA): “If an FDA emergency use-approved vaccine to prevent coronavirus/COVID-19 was available right now at no cost, would you agree to be vaccinated?” The poll was repeated in December 2020, with the same question sent to all registry participants. Willingness was defined as a “Yes” response, and hesitancy was defined as a “No” response. Participants were stratified into clinical care roles. Baseline demographics of survey respondents at each timepoint were compared using appropriate univariate statistics (chi-squared and t-tests). Analyses were descriptive, with frequencies and percentages reported for each category.

Results Of 4882 HERO active registry participants during September 1 – October 31, 2020, 2070 (42.4%) completed the October survey, and n=1541 (31.6%) completed the December survey. 70.2% and 67.7% who were in clinical care roles, respectively. In October, 54.2% of HCWs in clinical roles said they would take an EUA-approved vaccine, which increased to 76.2% in December. The largest gain in vaccine willingness was observed among physicians, 64.0% of whom said they would take a vaccine in October, compared with 90.5% in December. Nurses were the least likely to report that they would take a vaccine in both October (46.6%) and December (66.9%). We saw no statistically significant differences in age, race/ethnicity, gender, or medical role between time points. When restricting to the 998 participants who participated at both time points, 69% were vaccine-willing at both time points; 15% were hesitant at both time points, 13% who were hesitant in October were willing in December; and 2.9% who were willing in October were hesitant in December.

Conclusions In a set of cross-sectional surveys of vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers, willingness improved substantially over 2 calendar months during which the US had a presidential election and two vaccine manufacturers released top-line Phase 3 trial results. While improved willingness was observed in all role categories, nurses reported the most vaccine hesitancy at both time points.

Competing Interest Statement

Drs. Hernandez, O'Brien, and Forrest reports grants from PCORI, during the conduct of the study. None of these grants relate to the content of this work. Drs. O'Brien and Hernandez report grants from Pfizer to their institution. All other authors report no relevant conflicts.

Funding Statement

The statements presented in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of other organizations participating in, collaborating with, or funding the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The study was funded by PCORI through PCORI Award (COVID-19-2020-001), "HERO Registry & Trial: Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes."

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Duke Institutional Review Board (IRB) provided ethical oversight for the study. All participants provided informed consent prior to data collection.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings will be available in at PCORI-designated repository following study completion.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 03, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Recent changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers
Emily C. O’Brien, Haolin Xu, Lauren W. Cohen, Elizabeth A. Shenkman, Russell L. Rothman, Christopher B. Forrest, Adrian F. Hernandez
medRxiv 2021.03.01.21252457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.21252457
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Recent changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers
Emily C. O’Brien, Haolin Xu, Lauren W. Cohen, Elizabeth A. Shenkman, Russell L. Rothman, Christopher B. Forrest, Adrian F. Hernandez
medRxiv 2021.03.01.21252457; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.01.21252457

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)