Abstract
Background After serious knee injury, up to half of athletes do not return to competitive sport, despite recovering sufficient physical function. Athletes often desire psychological support to return to sport, but rehabilitation clinicians feel ill-equipped to deliver adequate support.
Objective To design and develop an Internet-delivered psychological support programme for athletes recovering from knee ligament surgery.
Method Our work developing and designing the Back in the Game intervention was guided by a blend of theory & evidence-based and target population-based strategies to developing complex interventions. We systematically searched for qualitative evidence related to athletes’ experiences, perspectives and needs for recovery and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Two reviewers coded and synthesised the results using thematic meta-synthesis. We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on psychological support interventions for improving ACL rehabilitation outcomes in athletes. One reviewer extracted the data (including effect estimates); a second reviewer checked the data for accuracy. The results were synthesised descriptively. We conducted feasibility testing in two phases: (1) technical assessment, and (2) feasibility and useability testing. For phase 1, we recruited clinicians and people with lived experience of ACL injury. For phase 2, we recruited patients aged between 15 and 30 years, who were within 8 weeks of ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants completed a 10-week version of the intervention, and semi-structured interviews evaluating acceptability, demand, practicality and integration. The project was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2018/45-31).
Results Three analytic themes emerged from the meta-synthesis (n = 16 studies, 164 participants): (1) tools/strategies to support rehabilitation progress, (2) barriers and facilitators for physical readiness to return to sport, and (3) barriers and facilitators to psychological readiness to return to sport. Coping strategies, relaxation and goal setting may have a positive effect on rehabilitation outcomes after ACL reconstruction (n = 7 RCTs, 430 participants). There were no trials of psychological support interventions for improving return to sport. Eleven people completed phase 1 of feasibility testing (technical assessment) and identified 4 types of software errors that we fixed. Six participants completed feasibility and useability testing. Their feedback suggested the intervention was easy to access and addressed the needs of athletes who want to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. We refined the intervention to include more multimedia content, and support to access and use the intervention features.
Conclusion The Back in the Game intervention is a 24-week Internet-delivered self-guided programme comprising 7 modules that complements usual rehabilitation, changes focus as rehabilitation progresses, is easy to access and use, and includes different psychological support strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project received financial support from the Swedish Research Council (2015-03687), Swedish Research Council for Sport Science (18-2016, D2018-0041, P2018-0180, P2019-0174), Östergötland County (LIO-729161), Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (GNT1109779), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (SKG2015-1). The funding agencies have not and will not have any role in developing and designing the intervention, collecting, analysing and interpreting the data, or writing and approving the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The project was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2018/45-31).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This project received financial support from the Swedish Research Council (2015-03687), Swedish Research Council for Sport Science (18-2016, D2018-0041, P2018-0180, P2019- 0174), Östergötland County (LIO-729161), Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (GNT1109779), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (SKG2015-1). The funding agencies have not and will not have any role in developing and designing the intervention, collecting, analysing and interpreting the data, or writing and approving the manuscript.
Authors’ contributions CLA: principal investigator and project leader; funds acquisition; intervention design, development and production; database searching, article selection, data extraction and synthesis; feasibility and useability study design, intervention administration, data collection, analysis and synthesis; drafting, revision and submission of the manuscript.
NH: database searching, article selection, data extraction and data synthesis; review of manuscript.
POH: funds acquisition; project planning; intervention design and development; review of manuscript.
KEW: funds acquisition; project planning; intervention design and development; review of manuscript.
JK: funds acquisition; project planning; intervention design and development; qualitative data extraction; feasibility and useability study design; data synthesis; review of manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests Clare Ardern, Nicholas Hooper, Paul O’Halloran, Kate Webster and Joanna Kvist declare they have no competing interests.
Figure 2 was slightly amended; text in 'Building block 6' section was updated to clarify how motivational interviewing strategies boost motivation.
Data Availability
All data are included in the manuscript
