Abstract
Background Lung volumes can be measured by body plethysmography (BP), by inert gas dilution during a single-breath or multiple breaths and by radiographic methods based on chest roentgenogram or CT scanning. Our objective was to analyze the concordance between several methods including a new instrument in a variety of pulmonary conditions.
Methods We recruited four groups of adult volunteers at the COPD and Tobacco Clinic of a respiratory referral hospital: patients with lung bullae, with obstructive lung diseases, with restrictive lung diseases and healthy controls; all subjects underwent lung volume measurements according to ATS/ERS standards in random order with each method and then CT scanning. Differences among groups were estimated by Kruskal-Wallis tests. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) and Bland-Altman plots were performed.
Results Sixty-two patients were studied including 15 with lung bullae, 14 with obstructive lung diseases, 12 with restrictive lung disease and 21 healthy subjects. Highest concordance was obtained between BP and CT scanning (CCC 0.95, mean difference −0.35 L) and the lowest, with TLC-DLCOsb (CCC 0.65, difference - 1.05 L). TLC measured by BP had a moderate concordance with Minibox (CCC=0.91, mean difference −0.19 L). Minibox, on the other hand had the lowest intratest repeatibility (2.7%) of all tested methods.
Conclusions Lung volumes measured by BP and CT had a substantial concordance in the scenario of varied pulmonary conditions including lung bullae, restrictive and obstructive diseases. The new minibox device, had low intratest variability, and was easy to perform, with a reasonable concordance with BP.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Institutional Ethics Committee (Code C63-18)
Funding Statement
The Minibox device was obtained from the distributor in Mexico at no cost. The company did not offer any additional grant or help and did not participate in the design, of the study, recruitment, analysis of results, or in the writing of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Code C63-18), was conducted at the Department of Research on Smoking and COPD at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (INER) Ismael Cosio Villegas.All participants signed an informed consent document.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have disclosed no conflict of interest.
Specific contributions of each author to the paper:
Zac J MD1: Literature search, Data Collection, Study design, Analysis of data, Manuscript preparation.
Zac S MD1: Literature search, Data Collection, Study design, Manuscript preparation.
Pérez-Padilla R MsC1: Study design, Analysis of data, Review of manuscript.
Remigio-Luna AM MD1: Data Collection, Manuscript preparation.
Guzmán-Boulloud N MD2: Study design, Review of manuscript.
Gochicoa-Rangel L PhD3: Analysis of data, Manuscript preparation.
Guzmán-Valderrábano C MsC3: Study design, Analysis of data, Review of manuscript.
Thirión-Romero I MsC1: Literature search, Study design, Analysis of data, Review of manuscript.
Data Availability
Data and Code AvailabilityThe data and codes related to the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author after publication upon reason-able request. The research team will provide an email address for communication once the data are approved to be shared withothers. The proposal with detailed aims, statistical plan, and other information/materials may be required to guarantee the rationalityof requirement and the security of the data. The patient-level data, but without names and other identifiers, will be shared after reviewand approval of the submitted proposal and any related requested materials.
