Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of albumin kinetics in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to those with sepsis-induced ARDS

Chang Su, Katherine Hoffman, Xu Zhenxing, Elizabeth Sanchez, Ilias Siempos, John S Harrington, Alexandra Racanelli, Maria Plataki, Fei Wang, Edward J. Schenck
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253405
Chang Su
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Hoffman
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xu Zhenxing
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Sanchez
2Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilias Siempos
3Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
4First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
MD, Dsc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John S Harrington
2Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
3Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Racanelli
2Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
3Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Plataki
2Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fei Wang
1Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: few2001{at}med.cornell.edu ejs9005{at}med.cornell.edu
Edward J. Schenck
2Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
3Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
MD MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: few2001{at}med.cornell.edu ejs9005{at}med.cornell.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

COVID-19 outcomes like mortality have been associated with albumin alteration. However, it is unclear whether albumin changes in COVID-19 are pathogen specific or not. To this end, we characterized the kinetics of serum albumin in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). We discovered two phases of alterations in albumin levels during the course of Covid-19 critical illness, but not for the sepsis-induced ARDS. Our findings suggest the metabolic effects of COVID-19 are pathogen-specific and albumin recovery may signal the cessation of a deleterious immune response in this disease.

[Main text]

COVID-19 has been associated with alterations in cellular metabolism, including many acute phase proteins such as albumin.1 Indeed, a lower albumin at admission to the hospital has been associated with a higher mortality in COVID-19.2 However, it is unclear whether albumin changes in COVID-19 are pathogen specific or are due to interventions such as mechanical ventilation. Our objective was to characterize the kinetics of serum albumin in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).

Methods

We did a retrospective study at the New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center (NYP-WCMC) that compared two critically ill cohorts with COVID-19 3 and sepsis-induced ARDS 4, respectively. Adult patients in the COVID-19 cohort were admitted from Mar 3 to Jul 10, 2020. SARS-CoV2 diagnosis was made through reverse-transcriptase–PCR assays performed on nasopharyngeal swabs. The critical care response to the pandemic has been previously described 5. Adult patients with sepsis-induced ARDS, defined by Sepsis III criteria 6 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 while treated with mechanical ventilation, were admitted from Dec 12, 2006 to Feb 26, 2019.

We evaluated serum albumin levels from 7 days prior to 30 days after intubation in each cohort. We averaged albumin values over 24 hours if more than 1 value was available. We then examined the albumin progression trajectories, aligned at intubation time to test the relationship at a similar point in disease progression, in survivors and non-survivors. We hypothesized that albumin recovery would be apparent in COVID-19 survivors. We derived an algorithm based on Chow’s test 7 to detect the albumin trajectory breakpoint for each patient, where a deteriorating albumin trend changed to a recovering trend. Specifically, for each patient, the Chow’s test was performed for each time point of the albumin trajectory, and the breakpoint was determined by rejection (P < 0.05 and F-value ≥ 3) of the null hypothesis that the coefficients of linear regressions before and after the breakpoint are equal. After that, we fit linear mixed-effects models to estimate the deteriorating and recovering trajectories, for survivors and non-survivors, respectively, adjusting for age and sex. We then analyzed albumin trajectories within the sepsis-induced ARDS cohort for comparison.

We reported descriptive data as mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. We assessed the differences between groups using Fisher’s exact test for categorical values, and two-sample t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous values where appropriate. All the tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The COVID-19 cohort consists of 308 intubated patients with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection (age 61.7 [SD=16.4] years; 31.5% female). 102 COVID-19 patients died prior to extubation during their hospitalization and 206 were successfully extubated. The non-survivors were older than the survivors (67.3 [SD=12.1] years vs 58.9 [SD=14.9] years, P<0.001). There was no significant difference of comorbidities between the non-survivors and survivors. The albumin level 24 h before intubation was similar in survivors and non-survivors (2.42 [SD=0.56] g/dL vs 2.57 [SD=0.58] g/dL, P=0.095), while the albumin value 24 h after intubation was lower in non-survivors than the survivors (2.03 [SD=0.50] g/dL vs 2.18 [SD=0.44] g/dL, P=0.015).

The sepsis-induced ARDS cohort contains 363 intubated patients with confirmed sepsis (age 68.8 [SD=17.3] years; 40.8% female), of which 52 were non-survivors and 311 were survivors. Overall, the intubated patients with sepsis-induced ARDS showed a higher burden of chronic comorbidities than the COVID-19 patients. Compared to the sepsis-induced ARDS patients, intubated COVID-19 patients had a longer intubation duration (for non-survivors, 18.1 [SD=15.5] days vs 12.8 [SD=17.5] days, P=0.070; for survivors, 24.5 [SD=17.8] days vs 8.3 [SD=12] days, P<0.001) and higher baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (for non-survivors, 13 [IQR, 11-15] vs 11 [IQR, 9-14], P=0.002; for survivors, 12 [IQR, 11-13] vs 9 [IQR, 7-11], P<0.001). More details of the characteristics of the two cohorts were shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the studied COVID-19 and sepsis cohorts.

Albumin trajectory in all critically ill Covid-19 patients consists of two clearly distinct phases (Figure 1). Phase I (deterioration) was defined by rapid albumin loss and Phase II (recovery) showed albumin stabilization or improvement. The Chow’s test detected albumin breakpoint for each patient occurred 5.47 [SD=3.83] days after intubation vs 5.61 [SD=4.06] days after intubation (P=0.943), in survivors and non-survivors, while the breakpoint albumin level was lower in non-survivors compared to that in survivors (1.50 [SD=0.43] g/dL vs 1.64 [SD=0.36] g/dL, P=0.030) (Table 1 and Figure 1A). Based on the breakpoint for each patient, linear mixed-effects models identified clear deterioration phases with similar slopes (i.e., rates of daily change of albumin level), among non-survivors (β=-0.101, 95% CI, −0.108 to −0.095, P<0.001) and survivors (β=-0.104, 95% CI, −0.109 to −0.099, P<0.001) (Figure 1A). Following the deterioration phase, there was a recovery phase in survivors (β=0.022, 95% CI, 0.021 to 0.023, P<0.001), that was higher than non-survivors (β=-0.002, 95% CI, −0.004 to 0.000, P=0.068). In contrast, we did not find a two-phase albumin progression trend in both survivors and non-survivors in the sepsis cohort (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Illustration of albumin trajectories.

(A) Albumin trajectories (averaged trajectories and two-phase linear mixed-effects model estimated trajectories) of non-survivors and survivors of the critically ill COVID-19 cohort. (B) Albumin trajectories (averaged) of non-survivors and survivors of the sepsis-induced ARDS cohort.

Discussion

We defined two phases of alterations in albumin levels during the course of Covid-19 critical illness. Albumin fell rapidly following intubation in our COVID-19 cohort regardless of outcome, however albumin recovery predicted clinical improvement in critical COVID-19. We did not see this pattern in a large sepsis-induced ARDS cohort. In our sepsis-induced ARDS cohort, albumin levels were prognostic; but, we did not see a clear recovering pattern in survivors. The albumin kinetics in sepsis-induced ARDS were similar to the ALBIOS study of albumin resuscitation in sepsis.8

Different albumin kinetics in COVID-19 compared to sepsis-induced ARDS may be due to differences in the patient’s premorbid states. Our COVID-19 patients had a lower burden of chronic liver disease, kidney disease and cancer compared to our sepsis population. However, COVID-19 may have temporally distinct metabolic effects compared to other life-threatening infections.1,9,10 Lastly, it is unclear whether the lack of albumin recovery in COVID-19 non-survivors was related to ongoing inflammatory viral effects or secondary hospital acquired complications. The metabolic effects of COVID-19 are pathogen-specific and albumin recovery may signal the cessation of a deleterious immune response in this disease.

Data Availability

Data is not publicly available.

Author Contributions

EJS, CS and FW conceived of the study. EJS, ES, IIS, AMC, and KH created the data sources and developed case definitions. CS, KH, ZX, FW and EJS did the data analysis. CS and EJS wrote the manuscript and all authors critically edited the final manuscript and approved.

Role of sponsors

The sponsor had no role in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, or the preparation of the manuscript.

FUNDING/SUPPORT

FW and CS are supported by NSF IIS 2027970, 1750326, ONR N00014-18-1-2585.

SUMMARY CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Ethics approval

Approved by the IRB at WCM #20-04021909, #1811019761

Acknowledgments

References

  1. 1.↵
    Shen B, et al. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera. Cell. 2020;182(1):59-72.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Wynants L, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369:m1328. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1328
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Schenck EJ, et al. Respiratory Mechanics and Gas Exchange in COVID-19– associated Respiratory Failure. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(9):1158–1161. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-427RL
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Schenck E, et al. An Analysis of the Respiratory Subscore of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scoring System in the Weill Cornell-Critical Care Database for Advanced Research (WC-CEDAR). D45 CRITICAL CARE: LOVE IN THE TIME OF CHOLERA - INFECTION AND SEPSIS IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT. American Thoracic Society; 2019:A6490–A6490.
  5. 5.↵
    Griffin KM, Karas MG, Ivascu NS, Lief L. Hospital Preparedness for COVID-19: A Practical Guide from a Critical Care Perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(11):1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202004-1037CP
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Singer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Chow GC. Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica. 1960;28(3):591–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910133
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Caironi P, et al. Albumin Replacement in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Lercher A, Baazim H, Bergthaler A. Systemic Immunometabolism: Challenges and Opportunities. Immunity. 2020;53(3):496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.08.012
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Wi YM, Kim JM, Peck KR. Serum albumin level as a predictor of intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12249. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(2):p222-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12249
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 24, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of albumin kinetics in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to those with sepsis-induced ARDS
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of albumin kinetics in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to those with sepsis-induced ARDS
Chang Su, Katherine Hoffman, Xu Zhenxing, Elizabeth Sanchez, Ilias Siempos, John S Harrington, Alexandra Racanelli, Maria Plataki, Fei Wang, Edward J. Schenck
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253405; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253405
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of albumin kinetics in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 compared to those with sepsis-induced ARDS
Chang Su, Katherine Hoffman, Xu Zhenxing, Elizabeth Sanchez, Ilias Siempos, John S Harrington, Alexandra Racanelli, Maria Plataki, Fei Wang, Edward J. Schenck
medRxiv 2021.03.16.21253405; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.16.21253405

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)