Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Assessing the utility of lymphocyte count to diagnose COVID-19

Michael Fralick, Orly Bogler, Daniel Tamming, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Janice Kwan, Terence Tang, Shail Rawal, Jessica Liu, Farad Razak, Amol A Verma
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.17.21252922
Michael Fralick
1Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mike.fralick{at}mail.utoronto.ca
Orly Bogler
1Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto
2Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Tamming
4Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
2Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janice Kwan
1Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terence Tang
5Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shail Rawal
2Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Liu
2Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farad Razak
4Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amol A Verma
4Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background COronaVirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be challenging to diagnose, because symptoms are non-specific, clinical presentations are heterogeneous, and false negative tests can occur. Our objective was to assess the utility of lymphocyte count to differentiate COVID-19 from influenza or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Methods We conducted a cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 or another respiratory infection (i.e., influenza, CAP) at seven hospitals in Ontario, Canada.The first available lymphocyte count during the hospitalization was used. Standard test characteristics for lymphocyte count (×109/L) were calculated (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]). All analyses were conducting using R.

Results There were 869 hospitalizations for COVID-19, 669 for influenza, and 3009 for CAP. The mean age across the three groups was 67 and patients with pneumonia were older than those with influenza or COVID19, and approximately 46% were woman. The median lymphocyte count was nearly identical for the three groups of patients: 1.0 ×109/L (interquartile range [IQR]:0.7,2.0) for COVID-19, 0.9 ×109/L (IQR 0.6,1.0) for influenza, and 1.0 ×109/L (IQR 0.6,2.0) for CAP. At a lymphocyte threshold of less than 2.0 ×109/L, the sensitivity was 87% and the specificity was approximately 10%. As the lymphocyte threshold increased, the sensitivity of diagnosing COVID-19 increased while the specificity decreased. The AUC for lymphocyte count was approximately 50%.

Interpretation Lymphocyte count has poor diagnostic discrimination to differentiate between COVID-19 and other respiratory illnesses. The lymphopenia we consistently observed across the three illnesses in our study may reflect a non-specific sign of illness severity. However, lymphocyte count above 2.0 ×109/L may be useful in ruling out COVID-19 (sensitivity = 87%).

Competing Interest Statement

Amol Verma and Fahad Razak are employees of Ontario Health, outside of this project. Mike Fralick is a consultant for a start-up company based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developing a CRISPR based diagnostic test for COVID19.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Sinai Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant Number VR4-172743). The development of the GEMINI data platform has been supported with funding from the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Frailty Network, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Medical Protective Agency, Green Shield Canada Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Ontario Health, the St. Michaels Hospital Association Innovation Fund, the University of Toronto Department of Medicine, and in-kind support from partner hospitals and Vector Institute. F.R. is supported by an award from the Mak Pak Chiu and Mak-Soo Lai Hing Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Approved by St Michael's Hospital REB

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Study concept and design: Fralick M, Bogler O, Razak F, Verma A, Tamming D

  • Acquisition of data: All authors

  • Analysis/interpretation of data: All authors

  • Drafting of the manuscript: Fralick M

  • Critical revision of the manuscript: All authors

  • Statistical analysis: Tamming D, Fralick M

  • Obtained funding: This study was funded by Sinai Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant Number VR4 - 172743). The development of the GEMINI data platform has been supported with funding from the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Frailty Network, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Medical Protective Agency, Green Shield Canada Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Ontario Health, the St. Michael’s Hospital Association Innovation Fund, the University of Toronto Department of Medicine, and in-kind support from partner hospitals and Vector Institute. F.R. is supported by an award from the Mak Pak Chiu and Mak-Soo Lai Hing Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto.

  • Conflicts of interest: Amol Verma and Fahad Razak are employees of Ontario Health, outside of this project. Mike Fralick is a consultant for a start-up company based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developing a CRISPR based diagnostic test for COVID19.

Data Availability

Not available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 20, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the utility of lymphocyte count to diagnose COVID-19
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessing the utility of lymphocyte count to diagnose COVID-19
Michael Fralick, Orly Bogler, Daniel Tamming, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Janice Kwan, Terence Tang, Shail Rawal, Jessica Liu, Farad Razak, Amol A Verma
medRxiv 2021.03.17.21252922; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.17.21252922
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Assessing the utility of lymphocyte count to diagnose COVID-19
Michael Fralick, Orly Bogler, Daniel Tamming, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Janice Kwan, Terence Tang, Shail Rawal, Jessica Liu, Farad Razak, Amol A Verma
medRxiv 2021.03.17.21252922; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.17.21252922

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)