Abstract
Background/Aims To characterise the national patterns in rates of cataract surgery across England, review clinical thresholds against NICE guidance, and determine how far variable access to cataract surgery is attributable to regional variation in policy stringency and social deprivation.
Methods 127 Clinical Commissioning Groups (“CCGs”) provided cataract surgery data and threshold policies in response to a Freedom of Information request. Local cataract surgery rates were grouped by threshold stringency and analysed on an age group-corrected basis. ANOVA testing was used to assess effect of policy stringency on regional rates of cataract surgery.
Results In England, rates of cataract surgery vary threefold across CCGs, from 1,980 to 6,427 per 100,000 population over 60, with a standard deviation (784.76) of 22% of the mean value, 3,598. Threshold policies vary across CCGs: 33 had no policy, 45 utilised policies accessible on the basis of Quality of Life (“QoL”) impact, and 39, against NICE guidance, required a Visual Acuity (“VA”) threshold be exceeded. Rates of surgery by CCG were negatively correlated with restrictiveness of policy (η2=0.18, p<0.01), and positively correlated with the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), (r2□=□0.11, p<0.01). Prior approval processes are not significantly associated with reduced rates of surgery.
Conclusion Over two-thirds of CCGs continue to use threshold-based policies for access to cataract surgery, with one-third doing so solely on the basis of VA requirements, despite NICE guidance to the contrary. For NHS operations, variation in policy restrictiveness accounts for more of the variation in surgery rates than socioeconomic deprivation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding and had no sponsors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
n/a
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No additional data available
