ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the relationship between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception.
Design Cross-sectional, ex post facto comparative study on a single sample of patients.
Setting Four medium-high-level hospitals were included in the study — two public and two private from Zulia State in Venezuela.
Participants 556 medical records and patients were studied for the prevalence and patient safety perception study, and 397 of the healthcare providers involved in the care of these patients were surveyed for the patient safety culture study, at two public and two private hospitals.
Outcome measurement The primary outcome of this study was the Association between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception, and according to hospital funding type, private and public.
Results An inverse association was observed between Adverse Events Prevalence and its severity and Patient Safety Culture Index (PSCI: rho=-0.8 p=0.5) (95% CI=0.26-0.10) and Patient Safety Perception Index (PSPI: rho=-0.6 p=0.18) (95% CI=0.10-0.28), which were protective factors for patient safety. No association was identified between Patient Safety Culture and Patient Safety Perception (rho=0.0001). No statistical differences were identified by hospital type (p=0.93) (95% CI=0.70-1.2).
Conclusions The analysis of the variable correlations studied (AEP, PSC and PSP) within the same sample offers an interesting and useful perspective. In this sample, although no correlation was observed between the three variables as an interacting set, some correlation patterns were observed between pairs of variables that could guide further studies.
Strengths and limitations of this study
The association analysis of the three main variables (adverse events prevalence, patient safety culture and patient safety perception) in the same sample of patients and health professionals and over the same time period during which the care process and, consequently, the adverse events took place is an unprecedented and innovative approach, which contributes to the body of knowledge on this field of study.
The relational theoretical framework produced provides a “map” that can facilitate decision-taking and which establishes the variables that should be considered a priority. As a result, it is highly likely to have an impact on the clinical efficiency and safety of healthcare institutions and services.
The study was carried out at both private and public hospitals, enabling the behaviour of the aforementioned variables to be compared and analysed at each type of institution. The literature to date on this approach is scarce and offers little information.
Although the sample of hospitals selected is not representative of Venezuela, it is representative of the hospitals of one of the most productive and populated states in the country.
During stages 1 and 2, some resistance to collaborating with and completing the evaluation instruments was identified among the health professionals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Not applicable
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the ethics committees at the Clinic Hospital of Maracaibo (Act N 07-15), The Rosario Hospital of Cabimas (Act N 06-16), Our Lady of Chiquinquira Hospital of Maracaibo (Act N 0316), General Hospital of the South Dr. Pedro Iurbe(Act N 25-06-16-1). Patient consent is not required, because the observation units were healthcare professionals.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Data Availability
We declare that the data from which the results presented in this investigation are derived are available for reuse. The available data refer to: Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient safety Culture, Patient perception by patient safety. Patient Safety Culture Index by hospital. Patient Safety perception Index by hospital. Adverse event severity by hospital. Adverse event prevalence by hospital. Adverse event characteristics. This data is the result of another series of specific data derived from 3 instruments applied for the determination and study of each variable that corresponds to individually conducted studies, which are also available. For the location of this data, the ORCID of the person responsible for managing this data is presented. The reuse of this data is allowed under the conditions of other studies on the same database, which contribute to the body of knowledge of patient safety.
