Abstract
Background In 2011, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented homeless-tailored primary care medical home models, called the Homeless Patient Aligned Care Teams (HPACT) to improve care for homeless Veterans. The aim of this study was to describe the existing peer-reviewed literature on HPACTs by systematically reviewing studies published since 2011 to date.
Methods We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published from 2011 to June 2019 to evaluate the literature since the inception of the VHA’s Homeless PACT program implementation. We included original research articles evaluating the Homeless PACT and excluded those that did not contain original data.
Results Of 379 studies screened, 20 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Given wide variability in research designs and outcome measures, a narrative review was conducted. The 20 included studies were categorized into 3 groups: Early HPACT pilot implementations; Association of HPACT clinics with quality and utilization; and Specialized programs within HPACTs. Observational findings suggest reductions in emergency department utilization, improvements in primary care treatment utilization, engagement, and patient experience; but limited rigorous studies exist beyond single site pilots and a few large observational cohort studies.
Discussion The HPACT model has been successfully implemented in VHA medical centers throughout the country with multiple studies showing increased primary care engagement and improved patient experience; however, further studies are needed about quality, utilization and whether the model can be implemented outside the VHA system.
Registration Number/Funding source none
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Systematic review not in clinicaltrials.gov
Funding Statement
No funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB exempt systematic review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Systematic review performed from literature search in appendix.
