ABSTRACT
Background The microvascular proliferation (MVP) and the microvessel area (MVA) are known as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for glioblastoma; nevertheless, its measurement is costly, labor-intense, and invasive. MRI perfusion biomarkers such as such as relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) may be a feasible alternative to predict MVP and estimate MVA.
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the detection capacity of MRI markers such as rCBV to detect local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type glioblastoma. In addition, we aim to analyze the association between rCBV values and the microvessel area in different regions of the tumor.
Study type Retrospective study.
Population and subjects Data from 71 tissue blocks belonging to 17 IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients were compiled from the Ivy GAP database.
Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T or 3.0T. Pregadolinium and postgadolinium-based contrast agent-enhanced T1-weighted MRI, T2- and FLAIR T2-weighted, and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) T2* perfusion.
Assessment We analyzed preoperative MRIs to establish the association between the maximum and mean relative cerebral blood volume (rCBVmax and rCBVmean) with the presence/absence of microvascular proliferation and with the microvessel area for each tumor block.
Statistical tests Spearman’s correlation and Mann-Whitney test.
Results Significant positive correlations were found between rCBV and MVA in the analyzed tumor blocks (p<0.001). Additionally, significant differences in rCBV were found between blocks with MVP and blocks without MVP (p<0.0001).
Data conclusion The rCBV is shown as significantly different in those tissue blocks with microvascular proliferation from those blocks without it, and it is significantly correlated with microvessels area. This method allows a local detection and definition of MVP and MVA in different regions of the glioblastoma since the first diagnostic stage and in a non-invasive way.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was partially supported by the ALBATROSS project (National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation 2017-2020, No. PID2019-104978RB-I00) (JMGG); H2020-SC1-2016-CNECT Project (No. 727560) (JMGG), and H2020-SC1-BHC-2018-2020 (No. 825750) (JMGG). M.A.T was supported by DPI2016-80054-R (Programa Estatal de Promocion del Talento y su Empleabilidad en I+D+i). EFG was supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 844646.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data used in the study is public and Ethics committee approvals are exented
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available at https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.XLWAN6NL
