Abstract
Multi-scanner MRI studies are reliant on understanding the apparent differences in imaging measures between different scanners. We provide a comprehensive analysis of T1-weighted and diffusion MRI (dMRI) structural brain measures between a 1.5T GE Signa Horizon HDx and a 3T Siemens Magnetom Prisma using 91 community-dwelling older participants (aged 82 years). Although we found considerable differences in absolute measurements (global tissue volumes were measured as ∼6—11% higher and fractional anisotropy was 33% higher at 3T than at 1.5T), between-scanner consistency was good to excellent for global volumetric and dMRI measures (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range: 0.612—0.993) and fair to good for 68 cortical regions (FreeSurfer) and cortical surface measures (mean ICC: 0.504—0.763). Between-scanner consistency was fair for dMRI measures of 12 major white matter tracts (mean ICC: 0.475—0.564), and the general factors of these tracts provided excellent consistency (ICC ≥ 0.769). Whole-brain structural networks provided good to excellent consistency for global metrics (ICC ≥ 0.612). Although consistency was poor for individual network connections (mean ICCs: 0.275 – 0.280), this was driven by a large difference in network sparsity (0.599 versus 0.334), and consistency was improved when comparing only the connections present in every participant (mean ICCs: 0.533—0.647). Regression-based k-fold cross-validation showed that, particularly for global volumes, between-scanner differences could be largely eliminated (R2 range 0.615—0.991). We conclude that low granularity measures of brain structure can be reliably matched between the scanners tested, but caution is warranted when combining high granularity information from different scanners.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The LBC1936 and this research are supported by Age UK (Disconnected Mind project) and by the UK Medical Research Council [MRC; G0701120, G1001245, MR/M013111/1, MR/R024065/1]. CRB, SRC, MEB, IJD and EMT-D were also supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant R01AG054628. JMW and IJD are also supported by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (Ref 104036/Z/14/Z). MCVH is funded by the Row Fogo Charitable Trust (grant No. BROD.FID3668413). EMT-D is a member of the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin, which is supported by NIH center grant P2CHD042849. TCR is a member of the Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre supported by Alzheimer Scotland.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Written informed consent was obtained from each participant under protocols approved by the Lothian (REC 07/MRE00/58) and Scottish Multicentre (MREC/01/0/56) Research Ethics Committees.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Data availability statement: Participant data can only be made available to approved researchers under a formal data sharing agreement: https://www.lothianbirthcohort.ed.ac.uk/content/collaboration.
Data Availability
Participant data can be accessed to researchers through a data request, and under a formal data sharing agreement, as outlined on the study website: https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts/data-access-collaboration
https://www.ed.ac.uk/lothian-birth-cohorts/data-access-collaboration
